Oddly Radical: Environmental Virtue Ethics in Simak’s Way Station

Baus, Jeffrey M.

doi:10.2478/hjeas/2024/30/2/9

Abstract

This essay reconsiders Clifford Simak’s Way Station as a nuanced exploration of environmental virtue ethics, challenging the conventional view of Simak’s ideology as conservative. It argues that Simak critiques anthropocentrism, including that in Aldo Leopold’s “Land Ethic,” by advocating for a more authentic ecocentric perspective. Through close analysis, the essay examines how Simak integrates ethical considerations into his portrayal of the ecosphere and his characters’ responses to it, emphasizing the intrinsic value of all beings. Additionally, it explores Simak’s anti-anthropocentrism and alignment with ecofeminism, underscoring his preference for non-human entities. The essay also delves into Simak’s empathy for the “other,” illustrating how he promotes environmental justice and respect for all beings, irrespective of ability, beauty, or corporality. By illuminating Simak’s environmental virtue ethics, this essay contributes to a deeper understanding of how his pastoral science fiction shapes environmental consciousness and promotes ethical engagement with the natural world. (JMB)

References

Alberro, Heather. “‘Valuing Life Itself ’: On Radical Environmental Activists’ Post-Anthropocentric Worldviews.” Environmental Values 29.6 (2020): 637–762. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Barrows, Adam. “Temporal Otherness and the ‘Gifted Child’ in Fiction.” Time in Variance. Eds. Misztal, Arkadiusz, Paul A. Harris, and Jo Alyson Parker. Leiden: Brill, 2021. 97–111. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Botkin, Daniel B. Discordant Harmonies: A New Ecology for the Twenty-First Century. New York: Oxford UP, 1990. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cafaro, Philip. “Procreation and Consumption in the Real World.” Environmental Ethics 45.3 (2023): 295–306. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Callicott, J. Baird. Beyond the Land Ethic: More Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: SUNY, 1999. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Cokinos, Christopher. “The Pastoral Complexities of Clifford Simak: The Land Ethic and Pulp Lyricism in Time and Again.” Extrapolation 55.2 (2014): 133–52. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Dean, John. “The Uses of Wilderness in American Science Fiction.” Science Fiction Studies 9.1 (1982): 68–81. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Droz, L. “Anthropocentrism as the Scapegoat of the Environmental Crisis: A Review.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 22 (2022): 25–49. Web. 7 July 2024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Frasz, Geoffrey. “Environmental Virtue Ethics: A New Direction for Environmental Ethics.” Environmental Ethics 15.3. (1993): 259–74. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Fromm, Harold. “Aldo Leopold: Aesthetic ‘Anthropocentrist.’” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 1.1 (1993): 43–49. JSTOR, Feb. 2024.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Garrard, Greg. “Worlds without Us: Some Types of Disanthropy.” SubStance 41 (2012): 40–60. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Gomel, Elana. Science Fiction, Alien Encounters, and the Ethics of Posthumanism: Beyond the Golden Rule. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Kopnina, Helen, et al. “Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem.” Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 31 (2018): 109–27. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leopold, Aldo, and Barbara Kingsolver. A Sand County Almanac: And Sketches Here and There. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2020. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Leopold, Aldo, and Barbara Kingsolver. Round River. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1972. Kindle edition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Li, Jia, Sune Vork Steffensen, and Guowen Huang. “Rethinking Ecolinguistics from a Distributed Language Perspective.” Language Sciences, Vol. 80, 2020. Web. 3 Nov. 2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Lomax, William. “The ‘Invisible Alien’ in the Science Fiction of Clifford Simak.” Extrapolation 30.2 (1989): 133–45. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Merchant, Carolyn. The Anthropocene and the Humanities: From Climate Change to a New Age of Sustainability. New Haven: Yale UP, 2020. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, Bryan L. Ecology and Literature: Ecocentric Personification from Antiquity to the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Moore, Bryan L. “‘Evidences of Decadent Humanity’: Antianthropocentrism in Early Science Fiction.” Nature and Culture 9.1 (2014): 45–65. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Mylius, Ben. “Three Types of Anthropocentrism.” Environmental Philosophy 15.2 (2018): 159–94. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
O’Riordan, Timothy. Environmentalism. London: Pion, 1981. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pak, Chris. Terraforming: Ecopolitical TranSFormations and Environmentalism in Science Fiction. Liverpool: Liverpool UP, 2016. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Plumwood, Val. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge, 1993. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Pringle, David. “Aliens for Neighbours: A Reassessment of Clifford D. Simak.” Foundation 11/12 (1977): 15–29. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sandler, Ronald L. Environmental Ethics: Theory in Practice. New York: Oxford UP, 2017. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Sandler, Ronald L. “Environmental Virtue Ethics.” The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Ed. Hugh LaFollette. Blackwell, 2013. 1665–74. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simak, Clifford D. A Heritage of Stars. New York: Berkley Publishing, 1978. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simak, Clifford D. All Flesh is Grass. New York: Doubleday, 1965. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simak, Clifford D. City. New York: Open Road Media, 2015. Kindle edition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simak, Clifford D. Project Pope. New York: Ballantine Books, 1981. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Simak, Clifford D. Way Station. New York: Open Road Media, 2015. Kindle edition.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Silverberg, Robert. “Reflections: Rereading Simak.” Asimov’s 13 Aug. 2013. Web. 17 Feb. 2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Stibbe, Arran. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By. New York: Routledge, 2015. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Treanor, Brian. Emplotting Virtue: A Narrative Approach to Environmental Virtue Ethics. Albany, NY: SUNY, 2014. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Wensveen, Louke. Dirty Virtues. London: Humanities Press Intl, 1997. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Van Wensveen, Louke. “The Emergence of Ecological Virtue Language.” Environmental Virtue Ethics. Eds. Ronald Sandler and Philip Cafaro. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2005. 15–30. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Weston, Anthony. Back to Earth: Tomorrow’s Environmentalism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple UP, 1994. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
Williams, Raymond. The Country and the City. New York: Oxford UP, 1973. Print.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Oddly Radical: Environmental Virtue Ethics in Simak’s Way Station

Abstract

Paradigm

My account