References
- Arvidsson, S., 2010. Communication of corporate social responsibility: a study of the views of management teams in large companies. Journal of business ethics, Volume 96, pp. 339-354
- Arayssi, M., Dah, M. & Jizi, M., 2016. Women on boards, Sustainability reporting and firm performance. Sustainability accounting, Management and policy journal, Volume 7, pp. 376-401
- Banai, M. & Sama, L., 2000. Ethical dilemmas in MNCs international staffing policies an conceptual framework. Journal of business ethics, Volume 25, pp. 221-235.
- Bole, V. & Rebec, P., 2013. Bootstrapping the Hausman Test in Panel Data Models. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, Volume 42 (3), pp. 650-670.
- Carrol, A., 1979. A three dimensional conceptual modelof corporate performance. Academy of management review, Volume 4, pp. 497-505
- Colombo stock Exchange, IFS, 2019. Women on boards of companies listed on the Colombo Stock Exchange, Second Edition, s.l.: CSE, IFS.
- Colaco, H., Myers, P. & Nitkin, M., 2011. Pathways to leadership: board independance, diversity and the emerging pipeline in the United states for women directors. Internation journal of disclosure and governance, Volume 8, pp. 122-147.
- Carpenter, V. & Feroz, E., 2001. Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: an analysis of four US state government’ decision to adopt generally accepted accounting principles. Accounting organizations and society, Volume 26, pp. 565-596.
- Cresswell, J. & Garrett, A. L., 2008. The “movement” of mixed methods research and the role of educators. South African Journal of Education, Volume 28.
- Elkington, J., 1997. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of twenty-first century business.
- Gomez, J. M. & Blanco, J. C., 2018. The relationship between women’s presence in corporate positions and firm performance. International journal of gender and entrepreneurship, Volume 10, pp. 83-100.
- Gray, R., Kouhy, R. & Lavers, S., 1995. Constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies; A methodological note. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability journal, Volume 8, pp. 78-101
- Herwartz, H. & Neumann, M., 2007. A robust bootstrap approach to the Hausman test in stationary panel data models
- Joecks, J. & Vetter, K., 2013. Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm performance : what exactly constitutes a critical mass?. Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 118, pp. 61-72
- Jannine, P.-H. & Briano, T. G. C., 2019. Gender diversity on the board of directors and corporate risk : A behavioural agency theory perspective. Volume 62 (C), pp. 80-90.
- Khan, S. A. R., Yu, Z., Panait, M., Janjua, L. R., & Shah, A. (Eds.). (2021). Global corporate social responsibility initiatives for reluctant businesses. IGI Global.
- MSCI Index, 2019. Women on boards 2019 Progress Report, s.l.: MSCI ESG Research LLC
- Millar, T. & Triana, M., 2009. Demographic diversity in the boardroom : Mediators of the board diversity- firm performance relationship. Journal of Management Studies, Volume 46, pp. 754-786
- Matei, M., & Voica, M. C. (2013). Social Responsibility in the Financial and Banking Sector. Economic Insights-Trends & Challenges, 65(1).
- Meek, G., Roberts, C. & Gray, S., 1995. Factors influencing voluntary annual report disclosures by US, UK and continental European multinational corporations. journal of international business studies, Volume 26, pp. 555-572
- Mohamed, S. M., Junaid, S. M., Ho, P. L. & Anbalagan, K., 2014. The influence of board characteristics on sustainability reporting- Empirical evidence from Sri lankan firms. Asian Review of Accounting, Volume 22, pp. 78-97.
- Mudiyanselage, N. C. S. R., 2018. Board involvement in corporate sustainability reporting: evidence from Sri Lanka. Corporate Governance, Volume 18, pp. 1042-1056.
- Morse, J., 1991. Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing research, Volume 40(2), pp. 120-123
- Our common future, 1987. Our common future, UN nations: Brundtland commission.
- Pfeffer, J & Salancik, G.R, 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford Business Book.
- Rahman, B. S. & Post, N., 2010. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 97, pp. 126-138.
- Reverte.C, 2009. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure ratings by spanish listed firms. Journal of Business Ethics, Volume 88, pp. 351-366.
- Siciliano, J., 1996. The relationship of board member diversity to organizational performance. Journal of business ethics, Volume 15, pp. 1313-1320.
- Sooriyaarachchi, T. D., 2018. AN ANALYSIS OF THE STATE OF SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING IN SELECTED SRI LANKAN COMPANIES
- Tinto, R., 2009. Why gender matters- A resource guide for integrating gender considerations into communities. [Online] Available at: www.riotinto.com/document/ReportsPublications/Rio_tinto_gender_guide.pdf
- UNIFEM, 2009. Progress of the world’s women 2008/9. Who Answers to Women - Gender & Accountability. [Online] Available at: www.unifem.org/progress/2008/mediaPOWW08_Report_Full_Text_pdf
- Vinnicombe, S. S., Burke, V., Bilimoria, R. J. & Huse, M., 2008. Women on corporate boards of directors. International research and practice.
- Wills, O., 2017. Does putting women on boards really matters?.
- Wong, K., 1996. Bootstrapping Hauseman’s exogeneity test.Economic letters. Volume 53 (2), pp. 139-143