Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Self-Plagiarism in AAAS Science Article about Pubpeer’s President, Brandon Stell Cover

Self-Plagiarism in AAAS Science Article about Pubpeer’s President, Brandon Stell

HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration
Volume 11 (2020): Issue 2 (August 2020)
By: Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva  
Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. AAAS (2014) Retraction Watch and PRE partner to improve scholarly publishing practices. https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2014-09/joba-rwa091114.php (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. AAAS (2017) AAAS and Gates Foundation partnership announcement. AAAS forms partnership to expand access to high-quality scientific publishing. http://www.sciencemag.org/about/aaas-and-gates-foundation-partnership-announcement (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Blatt MR (2015) Vigilante science. Plant Physiology 169(2): 907-909. DOI: 10.1104/pp.15.0144310.1104/pp.15.01443
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Chawla DS (2017) Gates Foundation strikes deal to allow its researchers to publish in Science journals. DOI: 10.1126/science.aal076710.1126/science.aal0767
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Couzin-Frankel J (2015a) PubPeer’s secret is out: Founder of controversial website reveals himself. Science DOI: 10.1126/science.aad1691; https://www.pubpeer.com/publications/139799228DD44E9F5129462C843AE110.1126/science.aad1691
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Couzin-Frankel J (2015b) PubPeer co-founder reveals identity – and new plans. Science 349(6252): 1036. DOI: 10.1126/science.349.6252.1036; https://www.pubpeer.com/publications/505FBF801E2E7F3B0BC1147116A65710.1126/science.349.6252.1036
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Culley, T.M. (2014) APPS’s stance on self-plagiarism: Just say no. Applications in Plant Science 2(7), pii: apps.1400055. DOI: 10.3732/apps.140005510.3732/apps.1400055
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Etkin A, Oransky I (2016) Dopey dupe retractions: How publisher error hurts researchers. Editorial Office News 9(11): p. 12. DOI: 10.18243/eon/2016.9.11.210.18243/eon/2016.9.11.2
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Garfinkel MS (2015) A fresh look at self-plagiarism. http://www.aaas.org/news/fresh-look-self-plagiarism (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Harriman S, Patel J (2014) Text recycling: acceptable or misconduct? BMC Medicine 12:148. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-014-0148-810.1186/s12916-014-0148-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Hasan H, Abdul-Kareem S (2017) Retraction Note to: Human–computer interaction using vision-based hand gesture recognition systems: a survey. Neural Computing and Applications 28(4): 849. DOI: 10.1007/s00521-017-2867-110.1007/s00521-017-2867-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Marcovitch H, Barbour V (2014) Whose words in the textbook? Anesthesia & Analgesia 118(1): 3–4. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a5c5ef10.1213/ANE.0b013e3182a5c5ef
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. McCook, A. (2018) Journal says it will correct three papers by prominent psychologist for duplication. https://retractionwatch.com/2018/05/16/journal-says-it-will-correct-three-papers-by-prominent-psychologist-for-duplication/ (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Moskovitz, C. (2019) Text recycling in scientific writing. Science and Engineering Ethics 25(3): 813-851. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Mullin B (2016) WIRED fires reporting fellow for plagiarism. http://www.poynter.org/2016/wired-fires-reporter-for-plagiarism/398571/ (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Oransky I (2016) Happy sixth anniversary, Retraction Watch! Here’s to a new partnership with Science. http://retractionwatch.com/2016/08/03/happy-sixth-anniversary-retraction-watch-heres-to-a-new-partnership-with-science/ (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Pinholster G (2015) AAAS, publisher of Science, acquires Peer Review Evaluation (PRE) service to help promote transparency and public trust in science. http://www.aaas.org/news/aaas-publisher-science-acquires-peer-review-evaluation-pre-service-help-promote-transparency (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. PubPeer (2017) Science. https://www.pubpeer.com/journals/Science (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Retraction Watch (2018a) Board of directors. https://retractionwatch.com/the-center-for-scientific-integrity/board-of-directors/ (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Retraction Watch (2018b) Science. http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-journal/science-journal/ and http://retractionwatch.com/category/by-journal/science-journal-retractions/ (last accessed: March 11, 2020)
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Roig M (2010) Plagiarism and self-plagiarism: What every author should know. Biochemia Medica 20(3):295-300. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2010.03710.11613/BM.2010.037
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Sliwa, P. (2017) Moral understanding as knowing right from wrong. Ethics 127(3): 521-552. DOI: 10.1086/69001110.1086/690011
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Supak-Smocić, V., Bilić-Zulle, L. (2013). How do we handle self-plagiarism in submitted manuscripts? Biochemica Medica 23(2): 150-153. DOI: 10.11613/BM.2013.01910.11613/BM.2013.019
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Teixeira da Silva JA (2015) Fair use in post-publication peer review. Journal of Educational and Social Research 5(3): 13. DOI: 10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p1310.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Teixeira da Silva JA (2016) Science watchdogs. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 5(3): 13-15. DOI: 10.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3p1310.5901/ajis.2016.v5n3p13
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Teixeira da Silva JA (2017a) Nested self-citation: the citation of a paper’s least divisible unit. Scientometrics 111(1): 547-552. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-017-2249-610.1007/s11192-017-2249-6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Teixeira da Silva JA (2017b) Copy-paste: 2-click step to success and productivity that underlies self-plagiarism. Science and Engineering Ethics 23(3): 943-944. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9804-z10.1007/s11948-016-9804-z
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Teixeira da Silva JA (2017c) COPE requires greater consistency and accountability. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences 8(1): 11-13. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p10.5901/mjss.2017.v8n1p11
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Teixeira da Silva JA (2017d) Ethical exceptionalism: can publishing rules be manipulated to give the impression of ethical publishing? Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science 16(4): 610-614. DOI: 10.3329/bjms.v16i4.3362310.3329/bjms.v16i4.33623
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Teixeira da Silva JA (2018a) The opacity of The PubPeer Foundation: what PubPeer’s “About” page tells us. Online Information Review 42(2): 282-287. DOI: 10.1108/OIR-06-2017-019110.1108/OIR-06-2017-0191
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Teixeira da Silva JA (2018b) Freedom of speech and public shaming by the science watchdogs. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education 5(1): 11-22.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Teixeira da Silva JA (2018c) The issue of comment ownership and copright at PubPeer. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 55(2): 181-191. DOI: 10.6120/JoEMLS.201807_55(2).e001.BC.BE
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Teixeira da Silva JA (2018d) Reflection on the Fazlul Sarkar vs. PubPeer (“John Doe”) case. Science and Engineering Ethics 24(1): 323-325. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9863-110.1007/s11948-016-9863-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Teixeira da Silva JA (2018e) The issue of comment ownership and copright at PubPeer. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 55(2): 181-191. DOI: 10.6120/JoEMLS.201807_55(2).e001.BC.BE
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Teixeira da Silva JA (2019a) Debunking the loss of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) moral compass: conspiracy theory, or genuine cause for concern? Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 29(3): 99-109.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Teixeira da Silva JA (2019b) Comment moderation and freedom of speech at PubPeer: challenges and issues. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education 6(3): 4-10.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Wray KB, Anderson LE (2018) Retractions in Science. Scientometrics 117(3): 2009-2019. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-018-2922-410.1007/s11192-018-2922-4
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/hjbpa-2020-0027 | Journal eISSN: 2067-9785 | Journal ISSN: 2457-5720
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 178
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2020
Accepted on: Mar 1, 2020
Published on: Jul 16, 2020
Published by: Association Holistic Research Academic (Hora)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Keywords:
American Association for the Advancement of Science,
ethics,
Jennifer Couzin-Frankel,
Laura and John Arnold Foundation,
opacity
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Political economics,
Political economics, other,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology, other

© 2020 Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, published by Association Holistic Research Academic (Hora)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 11 (2020): Issue 2 (August 2020)