Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diagnostic accuracy of swine echinococcosis cytopathological tests and challenges for a differential diagnosis: slaughterhouse data Cover

Diagnostic accuracy of swine echinococcosis cytopathological tests and challenges for a differential diagnosis: slaughterhouse data

Open Access
|Jun 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Flow chart of the diagnostic accuracy study.

Table 1.

Nature of infected organs in swine echinococcosis diagnosed in Côte.

ParasiteInfected organs
Liver (%)Lung (%)Kidney (%)
Echinococcus granulosus1753
Echinococcus spp.002
Total1 (1.6)7 (11.1)55 (87.3)

[i] Values in parentheses are percentages.

Fig. 2.

Kidney echinococcosis caused by Echinococcus granulosus

A: Hydatid cyst in kidney, swine. B: Broad capsule of hydatid cyst with typical striated and trilaminated layer and that do not contain calcification. Note a protoscolisce (arrow). HES stain. C: Protoscolice (arrow), with inside little calcareous corpuscles (arrow head). Protoscolisce is surrounded by almost no inflammatory reaction composed of few lymphocytes and macrophages (stars). There are no neutrophils.

Fig. 3.

Diagnostic accuracy for detection of swine echinococcosis between histopathological test and cytopathological test 1 (Ziehl stain with epifluorescence microscope).

Fig. 4.

Diagnostic accuracy for detection of swine echinococcosis between histopathological test and cytopathological test 2 (Ziehl Neelsen stain with transmitted light microscope).

Table 2.

Diagnostic accuracy of cytopathological test 1 (Ziehl staining with the epifluorescence microscope) and cytopathological test 2 (Ziehl Neelsen staining with the transmitted light microscope) in the detection of clinical swine echinococcosis.

Cythopath 1
% [95% CI]
Cythopath 2
% [95% CI]
Test ratio
[95% CI]
p value
Specificity100 [100 – 100]100 [100 – 100]1 [1 – 1]
Sensitivity79.66[69.39 – 89.93]66.10 [54.02 – 78.18]1.2 [0.88 – 1.66]0.059
PPV100 [100 – 100]100 [100 – 100]1 [1 – 1]
NPV40 [18.53 – 61.47]28.57 [11.84 – 45.3]1.4 [0.41 – 5.2]0.06
Fig. 5.

Cryptococcus neoformans hepatitis (5.A: HES Stain; 5.B: PAS stain: There are many budding yeasts (arrow); 5.C: Grocott Methenamine Silver stain).

Table 3.

Occurrence of diseases that could be misdiagnosed as swine echinococcosis in Côte d’Ivoire

DiseasesInvolved organs
LiverLungKidney
Ascaris suum infection or migration42
Cysticercus tenuicollis hepatitis1
Fasciolosis1
Cryptococcus neoformans infection1
Cirrhosis3
Neoplasms1
(Hepatocellular carcinoma)
01
(Small clear cell carcinoma)
Hydronephrosis4
Actinobacillus spp or Mycoplasma spp. Pneumonia or Pleuropneumonia11
Inflammatory conditions of unknown aetiology2
Abscess3
Total11167
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2023-0004 | Journal eISSN: 1336-9083 | Journal ISSN: 0440-6605
Language: English
Page range: 52 - 62
Submitted on: Apr 27, 2022
Accepted on: Dec 12, 2022
Published on: Jun 4, 2023
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2023 A. Toure, L. Toure, G. L. Acapovi-Yao, C. B. V. Senin, N. Kone, M. Kachani, E. Couacy-Hymann, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.