Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Diversity of parasites from Xenopus laevis (Amphibia: Pipidae) and their seasonal rate of infection in selected habitats in the Limpopo Province, South Africa Cover

Diversity of parasites from Xenopus laevis (Amphibia: Pipidae) and their seasonal rate of infection in selected habitats in the Limpopo Province, South Africa

Open Access
|Aug 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Map showing the natural distribution of Xenopus laevis in South Africa (circles).

The distribution is based on De Busschere et al. (2016). Triangles indicate the sampling localities or geographical regions.

Table 1

Information on Xenopus laevis sampled at the three localities in the Limpopo Province, South Africa, during the four seasons (January 2007–October 2007).

LocalitySeasonSexNumberStandard length
examined(mm)
AutumnMale884.75 ± 9.92
Female1088.87 ± 9.55
WinterMale1087.20 ± 13.04
ModjadjiskloofFemale1291.67 ± 9.77
SpringMale1191.09 ± 9.36
Female1094.70 ± 8.46
SummerMale1292.66 ± 8.46
Female1491.29 ± 8.79
AutumnMale1388.46 ± 8.51
Female1284.16 ± 9.28
WinterMale1581.80 ± 9.55
Female1393.77 ± 6.98
MokopaneSpringMale1288.50 ± 8.94
Female1084.40 ± 8.54
SummerMale1480.57 ± 6.97
Female1686.86 ± 10.07
AutumnMale1470.93 ± 4.64
Female1173.63 ± 7.21
WinterMale1073.90 ± 11.29
University of LimpopoFemale1570.87 ± 6.13
SpringMale866.94 ± 6.41
Female1772.75 ± 6.71
SummerMale1368.46 ± 5.21
Female1271.50 ± 10.45
Fig. 2

Trichodina xenopodos, photomicrographs. A = Trichodina xenopodos from a wet preparation. B = T. xenopodos in a Petri-dish with saline. Scale bar: (400×)

Fig. 3

Protopolystoma xenopodis, photomicrographs. A = ventral view. B = illustration suckers. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 4

Dollfuschella rodhaini, photomicrographs. A = ventral view of D. rodhaini. B = Enlarged sinus organ. Scale bar: A = 1100 μm, B = 10μm.

Fig. 5

Progonimodiscus doyeri, photomicrographs. A = posterior view of the large acetabulum. B = micrograph of whole body of Pd. doyeri. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 6

Cephalochlamys namaquensis, photomicrographs. A = enlarged view of the scolex. B = micrograph showing segments and the position of gonopores. Scale bar: 100 μm.

Fig. 7

Camallanus kaapstaadi, photomicrographs A = wet preparation of Cm. kaapstaadi. B = tapering tail with three mucrons.

C = enlarged buccal capsule with two large valves. Scale bar: A – B = (200x), C = (400x).

Fig. 8

Batrachocamallanus slomei, photomicrographs. A = opening of the anterior buccal capsule. B = posterior end showing mucrons.

Scale bar: A = 10 μm, B = 100 μm.

Fig. 9

Prevalence of parasites recorded from Xenopus laevis from Modjadjiskloof, Mokopane and University of Limpopo in different seasons. Key: T. xenopodos = Trichodina xenopodos, Pt. xenopodos = Protopolystoma xenopodis, D. rodhaini = Dollfuschella rodhaini, Pd. doyeri = Progonimodiscus doyeri, Cp. namaquensis = Cephalochlamys namaquensis, B. slomei = Batrachocamallanus slomei, Cm. kaapstaadi = Camallanus kaapstaadi.

Fig. 10

Mean intensity of parasites recorded from Xenopus laevis from Modjadjiskloof, Mokopane and University of Limpopo in different seasons. Key: T. xenopodos = Trichodina xenopodos, Pt. xenopodos = Protopolystoma xenopodis, D. rodhaini = Dollfuschella rodhaini, Pd. doyeri = Progonimodiscus doyeri, Cp. namaquensis = Cephalochlamys namaquensis, B. slomei = Batrachocamallanus slomei, Cm. kaapstaadi = Camallanus kaapstaadi.

Table 2

Summary of the occurrence of parasites from Xenopus laevis in relation to size and sex for surveys conducted in Modjadjiskloof, Mokopane, University of Limpopo, Limpopo Province, South Africa.

LocalityParasitesChi-squarep – value
Preference for sex
Trichodina xenopodos0.2020.653
Protopolystoma xenopodis0.0090.926
Dollfuschella rodhaini0.4040.525
ModjadjiskloofProgonimodiscus doyeri2.0630.151
Cephalochlamys namaquensis0.0100.920
Batrachocamallanus slomei2.9400.086
Camallanus kaapstaadi0.2920.589
Dollfuschella rodhaini1.0690.301
Progonimodiscus doyeri2.0160.156
MokopaneCephalochlamys namaquensis0.0470.829
Batrachocamallanus slomei0.0120.912
Camallanus kaapstaadi1.0830.298
Protopolystoma xenopodis1.2550.263
University of LimpopoBatrachocamallanus slomei0.2360.627
LocalityCamallanus kaapstaadi Parasites0.219 R2 value0.640 p – value
Preference for size
Trichodina xenopodos0.0270.806
Protopolystoma xenopodis0.1760.103
Dollfuschella rodhaini0.1310.225
ModjadjiskloofProgonimodiscus doyeri−0.0450.680
Cephalochlamys namaquensis0.0280.796
Batrachocamallanus slomei0.0640.558
Camallanus kaapstaadi0.1300.231
Dollfuschella rodhaini−0.0130.895
Progonimodiscus doyeri−0.1360.166
MokopaneCephalochlamys namaquensis−0.0420.669
Batrachocamallanus slomei−0.0510.607
Camallanus kaapstaadi−0.0390.691
Protopolystoma xenopodis−0.0890.376
University of LimpopoBatrachocamallanus slomei−0.1040.303
Camallanus kaapstaadi−0.0140.893
Table 3

Summary of surface water variables in the three localities. Values are given as averages of four seasonal sampling periods.

VariableLocality
ModjadjiskloofMokopaneTurfloop
Temperature (°C)22.223.625.5
pH7.87.27.5
Conductivity (mS/m)50.7115.365.5
Turbidity (NTU)2.98.51.8
DO (mg-l)7.15.67.15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0027 | Journal eISSN: 1336-9083 | Journal ISSN: 0440-6605
Language: English
Page range: 252 - 267
Submitted on: Aug 2, 2019
Accepted on: Apr 8, 2020
Published on: Aug 5, 2020
Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2020 E. M. Mbokane, J. Theron, W. J. Luus-Powel, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.