A controlled study on efficacy and egg reappearance period of Ivermectin in donkeys naturally infected with small strongyles Cover

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

A controlled study on efficacy and egg reappearance period of Ivermectin in donkeys naturally infected with small strongyles

Volume 57 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)

By: R. A. Papini, C. Orsetti and M. Sgorbini

Open Access

|May 2020

Figures & Tables

Efficacy of Ivermectin (200 mcg/kg BW) in donkeys naturally infected with small strongyles_ Results are presented as individual and mean faecal egg per gram counts (FEPGCs) on treatment day (day 0) as well as individual FEPGC with faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT %) in the same cell, mean FEPGCs, and mean FECRTs in treated donkeys (I to X) examined at weekly intervals after treatment (days 14 to 91)_ In addition, individual and mean FEPGCs in untreated control donkeys (XI to XIV) at the same sampling times are also presented_

Days	Treated donkeys											Control donkeys
	I	II	III	IV	V	VI	VII	VIII	IX	X	Mean FEPGCs	Mean FECRT	XI	XII	XIII	XIV	AM of FEPGCs
0	370	630	410	200	770	700	580	240	180	380	446	-	280	210	410	640	385
14	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0^A	100%	365	280	460	400	376.2 ^A
	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
21	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0^B	100%	275	400	525	355	388.7 ^B
	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
28	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0^C	100%	465	355	525	485	457.5 ^C
	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
35	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0^D	100%	655	310	525	615	526.2 ^D
	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
42	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0	0^E	100%	205	335	325	275	285 ^E
	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%
49	5	0	0	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	1^F	99.7%	845	790	985	855	868.7 ^F
	98.6%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	100%	97.9%	100%	100%
56	10	0	5	0	45	25	0	25	0	5	11.5 ^G	97.4%	505	520	770	660	613.7 ^G
	97.3%	100%	98.8%	100%	94.1%	96.4%	100%	89.6%	100%	98.7%
63	5	5	10	0	40	25	5	5	0	15	11 ^H	97.5%	475	550	960	1010	748.7 ^H
	98.6%	99.2%	97.6%	100%	94.8%	96.4%	99.1%	97.9%	100%	96%
70	25	5	5	5	35	20	15	15	5	15	14.5^I	96.7%	680	490	785	755	677.5 ^I
	93.2%	99.2%	98.8%	97.5%	95.4%	97.1%	97.4%	93.7%	97.2%	96%
77	60	45	20	35	75	60	45	40	45	30	45.5 ^L	89.8%	360	390	195	300	311.2 ^L
	83.8%	92.8%	95.1%	82.5%	90.2%	91.4%	92.2%	83.3%	75%	92.1%
84	80	150	25	35	140	145	85	85	55	50	85 ^M	80.9%	1575	1165	675	760	1043.7 ^M
	78.4%	76.2%	93.9%	82.5%	81.8%	79.3%	85.3%	64.6%	69.4%	86.8%
91	195	195	60	40	160	125	175	125	110	115	130 ^N	70.8%	715	505	340	625	546.2 ^N
	47.3%	69%	85.4%	80%	79.2%	82.1%	69.8%	47.9%	38.8%	69.7%

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0017 | Journal eISSN: 1336-9083 | Journal ISSN: 0440-6605

Journal RSS Feed

Language: English

Page range: 163 - 170

Submitted on: Oct 4, 2019

|

Accepted on: Jan 9, 2020

|

Published on: May 23, 2020

Published by: Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology

In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

Publication frequency: Volume open

Keywords:

small strongyles,

egg reappearance period

Related subjects:

Life sciences, other,

Clinical medicine,

Microbiology, virology and infection epidemiology

© 2020 R. A. Papini, C. Orsetti, M. Sgorbini, published by Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous article Volume 57 (2020): Issue 2 (June 2020)Next article