Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Synergy of Contexts in the Creative Shaping of the Spatial Structure of the Housing Environment on the Example of the Experience of a Design Studio Cover

Synergy of Contexts in the Creative Shaping of the Spatial Structure of the Housing Environment on the Example of the Experience of a Design Studio

Open Access
|Mar 2025

References

  1. Abraham, A., 2022. Creativity or creativities? Why context matters. Design Studies, 78, January 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2021.101060.
  2. Akyol, D., 2017. Examination of effect of globalisation on urban landscape through trabzon çömlekçi urban transformation field in the context of urban structure. International Journal of Architecture and Urban Studies, 2(2):84-92.
  3. Amabile, T.M., 1996. Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
  4. Aranda-Mena, G., 2018. Tacit knowledge transfer for city design. In P. Rajagopalan & M. M. Andamon (Eds.), Engaging Architectural Science: Meeting the Challenges of Higher Density: 52nd International Conference of the Architectural Science Association 2018, Melbourne, Australia, pp.761-769.
  5. Bashier, F., 2014. Reflections on architectural design education: The return of rationalism in the studio. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 3(4),424-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2014.08.004.
  6. Biddulph, M., 2012. The problem with thinking about or for urban design. Journal of Urban Design, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.646251.
  7. Budge, K., 2015. Teaching art and design: Communicating creative practice through embodied and tacit knowledge. Arts and Humanities in Higher Education. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474022215592247.
  8. Carmona, M., 2014. Investigating Urban Design. In M. Carmona (Ed.), Explorations in Urban Design: An Urban Design Research Primer (pp.1-11). Farnham, UK: Ashgate.
  9. Cordts, M., M. Omran, S. Ramos, i in., 2016. The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understanding. In: 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (pp.3213-3223). Las Vegas, NV, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.350.
  10. Chmielewski, J.M., 2010. Teoria urbanistyki w projektowaniu i planowaniu miast. [The theory of urban planning in designing and planning cities]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
  11. Cross, N., 1982. Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies, 3(4):221-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(82)90040-0.
  12. Cross, N., 2007. Forty years of design research. Design studies, 28(1):1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.004.
  13. Cross, N., 2019. Editing Design Studies - and how to improve the likelihood of your paper being published. Design Studies, 63, A1-A9.
  14. Cuthbert, A.R., 2003. Introduction. In Designing Cities: Critical Readings in Urban Design (pp.2-20). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  15. Daly, S.R., Adams R., Bodner, G.M., 2012. What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2):187-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x.
  16. Domaradzki, K., 2013. Przestrzeń Warszawy. Tożsamość miasta a urbanistyka. [The Space of Warsaw: Identity of the City and Urban Planning]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
  17. Dorst, K., 2008. Design research: a revolution-waiting-to-happen. Design studies, 29(1):4-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.001.
  18. Ellin, N., 2012. Integral Urbanism: A Context for Urban Design. In S. Pickett, M. Cadenasso, & B. McGrath (Eds.), Resilience in Ecology and Urban Design (Vol.3). Dordrecht: Springer.
  19. Faste, R.A., 1972. The Role of Visualisation in Creative Behavior. Journal of Engineering Education, 63(2):124-127.
  20. Faste, R.A., 1994. Ambidextrous Thinking. In Innovations in Mechanical Engineering Curricula for the 1990s. New York: American Society of Mechanical Engineers.
  21. Faste, R.A., 1995. The role of aesthetics in engineering. Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Journal, 28, 385.
  22. Faste, R.A., 2001. The human challenge in engineering design. International Journal of Engineering Education, 17(4/5):327-331.
  23. Fann, K.T., 2012. Peirce’s theory of abduction. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
  24. Frayling, C., 1993. Research in Art and Design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1):1-5.
  25. Glaveanu, V.P., 2013. Rewriting the language of creativity: The Five A’s framework. Review of General Psychology, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029528.
  26. Hack, G., Canto, M., 1984. Collaboration and context in urban design. Design Studies, 5(3):178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(84)90011-5.
  27. Hassi, L., Laakso, M., 2011. Making Sense of Design Thinking. In IDBM Papers 1, edited by T. M. Karjalainen, M. Koria, and M. Salimäki (pp.50-63). International Design Business Management Program, Aalto University.
  28. Höök, K., Löwgren, J., 2012. Strong concepts: Intermediate- level knowledge in interaction design research. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI). https://doi.org/10.1145/2362364.2362371.
  29. Imrie, R., 2003. Architects’ conceptions of the human body. Environment and planning D. Society and Space. https://doi.org/10.1068/d271t.
  30. Jones, J.C., 1970. Design methods: Seeds of human futures. London: Wiley-Interscience.
  31. Kropf, K., 2009. Aspects of urban form. Urban Morphology, 13(2):105-20.
  32. Lawson, B., 2006. How designers think: The design process demystified. London: Routledge.
  33. Lehmann, S., 2019. Urban Regeneration. A Manifesto for transforming UK Cities in the Age of Climat Change. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04711-5.
  34. Linden, J.C., Lacerda, A.P., Aguiar, J.P., 2011. The Evolution Of Design Methods. Tidak Diterbitkan. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273704768. Accessed 13 May 2022.
  35. Lloyd-Jones, T., 2014. The context for urban design in practice. In M. Roberts, C. Greed, B. Erickson, T. Lloyd-Jones, A. Madanipour, C. Marsh, D. Seex, M. Theis, T. Townshend (Eds.), Approaching Urban Design (pp.128-131). London: Routledge.
  36. Lubart, T., 2017. The 7 C’s of Creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 51(4): 293-296. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.190.
  37. Luck, R., 2019. Design research, architectural research, architectural design research: An argument on disciplinarity and identity. Design Studies, 65: 152-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2019.11.001.
  38. Lynch, K., 1964. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  39. McCullough, M., Hoinkes, R., 1995. Dynamic data sets as collaboration in urban design. In M. Tan & R. Teh (Eds.), Proceedings of Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 1995, Centre for Advanced Studies in Architecture, Department of Architecture, National University of Singapore, 24–26 September, Singapore. http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/Show_id=caadria2010_044/paper/7c88. Accessed 13 May 2022.
  40. McKim, R., 1973. Experiences in Visual Thinking. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA.
  41. Owen, C.L., 1992. Context for creativity. Design Studies, 13(3):216–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694X(92)90200-T.
  42. Oxford Languages. 2022. Context, Oxford University Press.
  43. Pankina, M., 2020. Axiology and Praxeology of Design Thinking. KnE Social Sciences /Questions of Expertise in Culture, Arts and Design, pp.284-293. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v4i11.7559.
  44. Peinado, A.D., Klose, S., 2011. Design Innovation: Research-Practice- Strategy. In E. Bohemia, B. Borja de Mozota, & L. Collina (Eds.), Researching Design Education, Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium for Design Education Researchers (pp.18-21). CUMULUS Association//DRS SIG on Design Pedagogy, Paris.
  45. Peng, C., Jones, B.P., 2004. Reconstructing urban contexts online for interactive urban designs. Design Studies, 25(2):175-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2003.10.005.
  46. Polanyi, M., 1958. Personal Knowledge. Towards a post-critical philosophy (pp.266-67). New York: Harper Torchbooks.
  47. Polanyi, M., 2012. Personal knowledge. Routledge, London.
  48. Protzen, J.P., 2010. Design Thinking: What is that. Department of Architecture, Cal Design Lab Lecture, Sept. 14, 2010, Berkeley, University of California. http://www.ced.berkeley.edu/downloads/pubs/faculty/protzen_2010_design-thinking-what-is-that.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2022.
  49. Rhodes, M., 1961. An Analysis of Creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7):305–310.
  50. Rittel, H. W. J., Webber, M.M., 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2): 155-169.
  51. Rowe, P.G., 1991. Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  52. Sanders, E.B.N., 2005. Information, Inspiration and Co-creation. In The 6th International Conference of the European Academy of Design, March 29-31, 2005, University of the Arts, Bremen, Germany.
  53. Schön, D., 1983. The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
  54. Schön, D., 1987. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  55. Seex, D., 2014. Design at the local scale. In M. Roberts, C. Greed, B. Erickson, T. Lloyd-Jones, A. Madanipour, C. Marsh, D. Seex, M. Theis, T. Townshend (Eds.), Approaching Urban Design (pp.74-80). London: Routledge.
  56. Simon, H., 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  57. Szmetler, A., 2019. Początki urbanistyki współczesnej. Doświadczenia zagraniczne a środowisko warszawskich urbanistów przełomu XIX i XX w. [The beginnings of modern urbanism. Foreign experience and the milieu of Warsaw town planners at the turn of the 20th century.]. Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej.
  58. Trębacz, P. Duda, M., 2021. Designing of the public space structure of urban units as the condition for effective transformations of the post-industrial zone on the example of Pelcowizna area in Warsaw. Housing Environment, 34:96-111.
  59. Tschaepe, M., 2014. Guessing and abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society: A Quarterly Journal in American Philosophy, 50(1):115-138. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.50.1.115.
  60. Tubbs, N., 2000. From reflective practitioner to comprehensive teacher. Educational Action Research, 8(1):167-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790000200113.
  61. Wang, T., 2010. A new paradigm for design studio education. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29(1):18-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2010.01647.x.
  62. Vartanian, O., 2017. The creation and aesthetic appreciation of architecture. In J. C. Kaufman, J. Baer, & V. P. Glăveanu (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity Across Domains (pp.110-122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  63. Verhulst, L.C., Elsen, C., Heylighen, A., 2016. Whom do architects have in mind during design when users are absent? Observations from a design competition. Journal of Design Research, 14(4):368-387.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/he-2025-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2543-8700 | Journal ISSN: 1731-2442
Language: English
Page range: 139 - 167
Published on: Mar 28, 2025
Published by: Cracow University of Technology
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Paweł Trębacz, Renata Jóźwik, Magdalena Duda, published by Cracow University of Technology
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.