References
- Albano Leoni, F. (2015), “Les parties et le tout: Jakobson, Husserl et la phonologie”, Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 37, 1 (Le tout et ses parties. Langue, système, structure): 27-42.
- Archangeli, D. (1988), “Aspects of underspecification theory”, Phonology, 5 (2): 183-207.
- Benveniste, É. (1966a) [1971], “The Nature of Pronouns”, Problems in General Linguistics, University of Miami Press: 217-222.
- Benveniste, É. (1966b) [1971], “The Levels of Linguistic Analysis”, Problems in General Linguistics, University of Miami Press: 101-111.
- Bühler, K. (1934) [2011], Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache, Jena, Fischer; eng. Trans. Theory of Language. The Representational Function of Language, Amsterdam-Philadelphia, John Benjamins.
- Cantineau, J. (1955), “Le classement logique des oppositions”, Word 11(1): 1-9
- Cassirer, E. (1945), “Structuralism in Modern Linguistics”, Word, 1: 99-120.
- Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. (1968), The Sound Pattern of English, New York, Harper & Row.
- Cigana, L. & Jørgensen, H. (2023), “The issue of general meanings in structural linguistics and its legacy”, Acta Linguistica Hafniensia, 55-1: 6-15.
- Cigana, L. (2024), “Coseriu et Hjelmslev sur la théorie de la marque. Éléments pour continuer le dialogue”, Histoire Épistémologie Langage, 46 (1): 193-212.
- Corbett, G. (1991), Gender, Cambridge, CUP.
- Coseriu, E. & Geckler, H. (1981), Trends in Structural Semantics, Tübingen, G. Narr Verlag.
- Coseriu, E. (1969), Einführung in die strukturelle Linguistik, Tübingen, Narr Verlag.
- Coseriu, E. (1976), Das romanische Verbalsystem, Tübingen, Narr Verlag.
- Coseriu, E. (1988) [1992], Einführung in die allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Tübingen, G. Narr Verlag.
- Coseriu, E. (2000), “Structural semantics and ‘cognitive’ semantics”, Logos and Language. Journal of General Linguistics and Language Theory, 1 (1): 19-43.
- D’Amour, A. et al. (2022) “Underspecification Presents Challenges for Credibility in Modern Machine Learning”,The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23, 1: 10237–10297.
- De Backer, M. (2014), Lexical neutralisation: theoretical and empirical perspectives, Ghent University, Faculty of Arts and Philosophy (dissertation).
- De Palo, M. & Diodato, F. (2022), “Metaphor from Bühler’s Sprachtheorie to Conceptual Integration”, Reti, saperi, linguaggi, 2: 339-361.
- De Palo, M. (2019), “Bühler and the two-field theory. The notion of ‘field’ in language, between philosophy and psychology”, Paradigmi, 37 (2): 237-258.
- De Vaere, H., Kolkmann, J. & Belligh, Th. (2020), “Allostructions revisited”, Journal of Pragmatics, 170: 96-111.
- Diodato, F. (2019), “The Neo-Humboldtian Lexical Field Theory. Origin, reception and perspectives”, Paradigmi, 37/2: 259-274.
- Egg, M. (2019), “Semantic underspecification”, in Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, K. & Portner, P. (eds.), Semantics. Lexical Structures and Adjectives, De Gruyter: 272-320.
- Farkas, D. (1990), “Two cases of underspecification in morphology”, Linguistic Inquiry, 21: 539-550.
- Fiorentini, I. & Zanchi, C. (2024), Vagueness, Ambiguity, and All the Rest: Linguistic and Pragmatic Approaches, John Benjamins.
- Friedrich, J. (2023), “Teil und Ganzes in Karl Bühlers Sprachtheorie”, Gestalt Theory, 45, 1-2: 31-40.
- Frisson, S. & Pickering, M. (2001a), “Obtaining a figurative interpretation of a word: support for underspecification”, Metaphor and Symbol, 16: 71-99.
- Frisson, S. & Pickering, M. (2001b), “Figurative language processing in the underspecification model”, Metaphor and Symbol, 16: 149-171.
- Frisson, S. (2009), “Semantic underspecification in language processing”, Language and Linguistic Compass, 3: 111-127.
- Geeraerts, D. (2009), Theories of Lexical Semantics, Oxford, OUP.
- Haspelmath, M. (2020), “We are all structuralists”, Diversity Linguistics Comment: https://dlc.hypotheses.org/2356.
- Henne, H. (1972), Semantik und Lexikographie. Untersuchungen zur lexikalischen Kodifikation der deutschen Sprache, Berlin-New York, De Gruyter.
- Hjelmslev, L. (1934) [1970], Sprogsystem og sprogforandring (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, XV), Copenhagen, Naturmetodens Sproginstitut og Nordisk Sprog- og Kulturforlag.
- Hjelmslev, L. (1935), La catégorie des cas. Étude de grammaire générale, Aarhus, Universitetsforlaget; København: Levin & Munksgaard.
- Hjelmslev, L. (1937) [1970], “La nature du pronom”, in Essais linguistiques (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, XII), Copenhague, Nordis, Sprog- og Kulturforlag: 201-207.
- Hjelmslev, L. (1939) [1970], “La structure morphologique”, in Essais linguistiques (Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague, XII), Copenhague, Nordis, Sprog- og Kulturforlag: 122-147.
- Hutchinson, B., Baldridge, J., Prabhakaran V. (2022), “Underspecification in Scene Description-to-Depiction Tasks”, in Proceedings of the 2nd Conference of the Asia-Pacific Chapter [...], 1: 1172–1184.
- Jakobson, R. (1936) [1984]. “Contribution to the General Theory of Case: General Meanings of the Russian Cases”, in L. R. Waugh and M. Halle (eds.), Roman Jakobson, Russian and Slavic Grammar: Studies 1931-1981, Berlin, De Gruyter: 59-103.
- Jakobson, R. (1957) Shifters, verbal categories and the Russian verb; Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University, Dept. of Slavic Languages and Literatures.
- Jakobson, R. (1963), “Parts and Wholes in Language”, in D. Lerner (ed.), Parts and Wholes. The Hayden Colloquium on Scientific Method and Concept, New York, The Free Press of Glencoe: 157-174.
- Karcevskij, S. (1929), “The Asymmetric Dualisme of the Linguistic Sign”, English translation by Wendy Steiner of “Du dualisme asymétrique du signe linguistique” (Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague, 1: 88-92) : 47-54. I failed to get the source, but the document is available online: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://is.muni.cz/el/1421/jaro2011/CJBC621/um/01b.Karcevskij_-_The_Asymmetric_Dualism.pdf.
- Kienpointer, M. (2008), “The Case for Core Meaning”, in Korta K. & Garmendia J. (eds.), Meaning, Intentions and Argumentation, Stanford, CSLH Publications: 77-102.
- Kaplan, D. (1989), “Demonstratives”, in Almog, Perry, and Wettstein, Themes from Kaplan, Oxford, OUPS: 481-563.
- Krämer, M. (2012), Underlying representations, Cambridge, CUP.
- Lando, G. (2017), Mereology. A Philosophical Introduction, Bloomsbury, London-Oxford-New York.
- Lumsden, J. S. (1992), “Underspecification in Grammatical and Natural Gender”, Linguistic Inquiry, 23 (3): 469-486.
- Nagel, E. (1963), “Wholes, Sums, and Organic Unities”, in Lerner, D. (ed.), Parts & Wholes. The Hayden Colloquium on Scientific Method and Concept, New York, The Free Press of Glencoe: 135-155.
- Pezzelle, S. (2023), “Dealing with Semantic Underspecification in Multimodal NLP”, in Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (1), Toronto, Canada: 12098-12112.
- Prebensen, H. (1967), “La théorie glossématique est-elle une théorie?”, Langages, 6: 11-25.
- Recanati, F. (2004), Literal Meaning, Cambridge, CUP.
- Simons, Peter M. (1987), Parts. A Study in Ontology, Oxford, OUP.
- Sonesson, G. (2012), “The meanings of structuralism: considerations on structures and Gestalten, with particular attention to the masks of Levi-Strauss”, Segni e comprensione, XXVI(78): 84-101.
- Stjernfelt, F. (2023), “Dependences: How to connect entities, across pragmatism, phenomenology, and structuralism”, in L. Cigana, F. Gregersen (eds.), Structuralism as one, Structuralism as many. Studies in Structuralism, Copenhagen, Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab: 111-145.
- Taylor, J. R. (1999), “Cognitive Semantics and Structural Semantics”, in A. Blank & P. Koch (eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition, De Gruyter: 17-48.
- Tesnière, L. (1956) [2015], Elements of Structural Syntax, John Benjamins.
- Willems, K. (2021), “Saussure on synonymy”, Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 74: 115-134.
- Willems, K. (2023), “The importance of Coseriu’s theory of meaning for present-day linguistics”, Caietele Sextil Puşcariu, VI: 585-608.
Language: English, German
Page range: 111 - 130
Published on: May 18, 2026
Published by: Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2026 Lorenzo Cigana, published by Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.