Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Approximation in Perceptual Completion Cover

Approximation in Perceptual Completion

By: Walter Gerbino  
Open Access
|Aug 2025

References

  1. Bondarko, V. M., Solnushkin, S. D., & Chikhman, V. N. (2022). Estimation of curvature of real and interpoled images. Human Physiology, 48(5), 496–505. doi: 10.1134/S0362119722600254.
  2. Bregman, A. S. (1981). Asking the “what for” question in auditory perception. In M. Kubovy & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Perceptual organization (pp. 99–118). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Burke, L. (1952). On the tunnel effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 121–138. Reprinted in A. Michotte et collaborateurs (Eds.) (1962), Causalité, permanence et réalité phénoménales (pp. 374–406). Louvain: Publications Universitaires.
  4. Burmester, E. (1896). Beitrag zur experimentelle Bestimmung geometrisch-optischer Täuschungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 12, pp. 355–394.
  5. Cha, O., & Chong, S. C. (2018). Perceived average orientation reflects effective gist of the surface. Psychological Science, 29(3), 319–327.
  6. Cicchini, G. M., Mikellidou, K., & Burr, D. C. (2024). Serial dependence in perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 75(1), 129–154.
  7. Da Pos, O., & Zambianchi, E. (1996). Visual illusions and effects. Guerini.
  8. Dissegna, A., Gerbino, W., & Fantoni, C. (2023). Amodal completion of coincidentally occluded angles: a matter of visual approximation. Frontiers in Cognition, 2, https://doi.org/10.3389/fcogn.2023.1216459
  9. Fantoni, C., Bertamini M., & Gerbino, W. (2005). Contour curvature polarity and surface interpolation. Vision Research, 45, 1047–1062.
  10. Fantoni, C., & Gerbino, W. (2003). Contour interpolation by vector-field combination. Journal of Vision, 3(4), 281–303.
  11. Fantoni, C., Gerbino, W., & Kellman, P. J. (2008). Approximation, torsion, and amodally-completed surfaces. Vision Research, 48, 1196–1216. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.01.026
  12. Fantoni, C., Gerbino, W., & Rigutti, S. (2007). Form misorientation in limiting cases of amodal completion. Perception – ECVP ’07 Abstracts, 36(1_suppl), 106.
  13. Fantoni, C., Hilger, J. D., Gerbino, W., & Kellman, P. J. (2008). Surface interpolation and 3D relatability. Journal of Vision, 8(7): 29, 1–19. doi: 10.1167/8.7.29
  14. Feldman, J. (2007). Formation of visual “objects” in the early computation of spatial relations. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 816–827.
  15. Fischer, J., & Whitney, D. (2014). Serial dependence in visual perception. Nature Neuroscience, 17(5), 738–743.
  16. Foster, D. H., Simmons, D. R., & Cook, M. J. (1993). The cue for contour-curvature discrimination. Vision Research, 33(3), 329–341.
  17. Gerbino, W. (1978). Some observations on the formation of angles in amodal completion. The Italian Journal of Psychology, 5, 88–100.
  18. Gerbino, W. (2017). Amodally completed angles. In A. Shapiro, & D. Todorović (Eds.), The Oxford compendium of visual illusions (pp. 677–682). Oxford University Press.
  19. Gerbino, W. (2019). Percezione attuale, esperienza passata e l’«esperimento impossibile» di Gaetano Kanizsa: Cinquant’anni dopo [Actual perception, past experience and the «impossible experiment» by Gaetano Kanizsa: Fifty years later]. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 46, 289–298.
  20. Gerbino, W. (2020a). Perception and past experience 50 years after Kanizsa‘s (im)possible experiment. Perception, 49(3), 247–267. doi: 10.1177/0301006619899005.
  21. Gerbino, W. (2020b). Amodal completion revisited. i-Perception, 11. doi: 10.1177/2041669520937323
  22. Gerbino, W. (in press). Amodally completed angles. In A. Shapiro, D. Todorović, & K. Takahashi (Eds.), The Oxford compendium of visual illusions (submitted). Second edition, Oxford University Press.
  23. Gerbino, W. & Fantoni, C. (2006). Visual interpolation is not scale invariant. Vision Research, 46, 3142–3159.
  24. Gerbino, W., & Kanizsa, G. (1987). Can we see constructs? In S. Petry & G. Meyer (Eds.) The perception of illusory contours (pp. 246–252). New York: Springer.
  25. Gillam, B. (2017). An analysis of theoretical approaches to geometrical-optical illusions. In A. Shapiro & D. Todorović (Eds.), The Oxford compendium of visual illusions, pp. 64–73. Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794607.003.0004
  26. Gregory, R. L. (1970). The intelligent eye. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  27. Hering, E. (1861). Beiträge zur Physiologie. I. Zur Lehre vom Ortssinne der Netzhaut. Leipzig: Engelmann.
  28. Horrell, R. I. (1971). The angle of intersection of contours as the determinant of a geometric illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 10, 208–210.
  29. Hotopf, W. H. N., & Ollerearnshaw, C. (1972). The regression to right angles tendency and the Poggendorff illusion. II. British Journal of Psychology, 63, 369–379.
  30. Jastrow, J. (1892a). Studies from the Laboratory of Experimental Psychology of the University of Wisconsin, II. The American Journal of Psychology, 4(3), 381–428.
  31. Jastrow, J. (1892b). Some optical illusions. Nature, 46(1199), 590–592.
  32. Kanizsa, G. (1968). Percezione attuale, esperienza passata e l’«esperimento impossibile» [Actual perception, past experience and the «impossible experiment»]. In G. Kanizsa & G. B. Vicario (Eds.), Ricerche sperimentali sulla percezione [Experimental investigations on perception] (pp. 10–47). Trieste, Italy: Università degli studi di Trieste. Republished in the March–June 2019 issue of Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 46, 299–323.
  33. Kanizsa, G. (1969). Perception, past experience and the impossible experiment. Acta Psychologica, 31, 66–96.
  34. Kanizsa, G. (1971). Attualità dell’opera di Metzger [Current validity of Metzger’s work]. Presentation of the Italian edition of W. Metzger, Psychologie [I fondamenti della psicologia della Gestalt]. Firenze: Giunti- Barbèra.
  35. Kanizsa, G. (1975). The role of regularity in perceptual organization. In G. Flores d’Arcais (Ed.), Studies in perception (pp. 48-66). Firenze: Martello-Giunti.
  36. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision. New York, NY: Praeger. Italian edition entitled Grammatica del vedere [Grammar of vision]. Bologna, Italy: Il Mulino, 1980.
  37. Kanizsa, G. (1985). Seeing and thinking. Acta Psychologica, 59, 23–33.
  38. Kanizsa, G. (1991). Vedere e pensare [Seeing and thinking]. Bologna: il Mulino.
  39. Kanizsa, G., & Gerbino, W. (1982). Amodal completion: seeing or thinking? In J. Beck (Ed.) Organization and representation in perception, pp. 167–190. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  40. Kanizsa, G., & Luccio, R. (1986). Die Doppeldeutigkeiten der Prägnanz. Gestalt Theory, 8, 98–135. (Italian translation, Le ambiguità della pregnanza, in G. Kanizsa, Vedere e pensare [Seeing and thinking], Chapter 4, Bologna: Il Mulino, 1991.
  41. Kellman, P. J., & Shipley, T. F. (1991). A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology, 23, 141–221.
  42. Kitaoka, A., Gyoba, J., Sakurai, K., & Kawabata. H. (2001). Similarity between Petter’s effect and visual phantoms.Perception, 30(4), 519–522. doi: 10.1068/p3004no.
  43. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. Harcourt Brace.
  44. Lewis, R. T. (1892). Optical illusions. Nature, 47(1202), 31.
  45. Lipps, T. (1897). Raumästhetik und Geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Leipzig: Barth.
  46. Masin, S. C. (1999). Test of Petter’s rule for perceived surface stratification. Perception, 28(9), 1147–1154. doi: 10.1068/p281147.
  47. Massad, A. (2006). A perceptual grouping approach for visual interpolation between good continuation and minimal path using tensor voting. In M. Chantler, B. Fisher & M. Trucco (Eds.), Proceedings of the British Machine Conference, 66.1–66.10. BMVA Press. doi:10.5244/C.20.66.
  48. Massironi, M., & Sambin, M. (1983). Ondulazione fenomenica: un altro effetto del completamento amodale [Phenomenal undulation: Another effect of amodal completion]. Ricerche di Psicologia, 7(26), 205–220.
  49. Metzger, W. (1936). Gesetze des Sehens. First edition. Frankfurt: Kramer. English translation by L. Spillmann, S. Lehar, M. Stromeyer, & M. Wertheimer, The laws of seeing. MIT Press, 2006.
  50. Metzger, W. (1953). Gesetze des Sehens. Second edition. Frankfurt: Kramer.
  51. Metzger, W. (1975). Gesetze des Sehens. Third edition. Frankfurt: Kramer.
  52. Michotte, A., & Burke, L. (1951). Une nouvelle énigme de la psychologie de la perception: le “donnée amodal” dans l’experience sensorielle [A new enigma in the psychology of perception: The “amodally given” in the sensory experience]. In Actes du XIII Congrés Internationale de Psychologie (pp. 179–180), V. Ferri. Reprinted in A. Michotte et collaborateurs (Eds.), Causalité, permanence et réalité phénoménales (pp. 372–373). Louvain: Publications Universitaires, 1962.
  53. Michotte, A., Thinés G., & Crabbé, G. (1964). Les complements amodaux des structures perceptives. Publications Universitaires. English translation, Amodal completion of perceptual structures, in G. Thinés, A. Costall, & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Michotte’s experimental psychology of perception (pp. 140–167). Erlbaum, 1991.
  54. Nakayama, K., Shimojo, S., & Silverman, G. H. (1989). Stereoscopic depth: Its relation to image segmentation, grouping and the recognition of occluded objects. Perception, 18, 55–68.
  55. Ninio, J. (2014). Geometrical illusions are not always where you think they are: a review of some classical and less classical illusions, and ways to describe them. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 856. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00856
  56. Ninio, J., & O’Regan, J. K. (1999). Characterisation of the misalignment and misangulation components in the Poggendorff and corner-Poggendorff illusions. Perception, 28, 949–964.
  57. Palmer, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  58. Palmer, S. E., Brooks, J. L., & Lai, K. S. (2007). The occlusion illusion: partial modal completion or apparent distance? Perception, 36, 650–669. doi: 10.1068/p5694
  59. Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2017). The occlusion, configural shape, and shrinkage illusions. In A. G. Shapiro & D. Todorović (Eds.), The Oxford compendium of visual illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 269–274. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199794607.003.0029
  60. Peta, A., Fantoni, C., & Gerbino, W. (2019). Mid-level priming by completion vs. mosaic solutions. i-Perception, 10(2), 2041669518820347.
  61. Petter, G. (1956). Nuove ricerche sperimentali sulla totalizzazione percettiva [New experimental researches on perceptual totalization]. Rivista di Psicologia, 50, 213–227.
  62. Pierce, A. H. (1898). Geometrical optical illusions. Science, 8, 814–829.
  63. Pinna, B. (2012). The role of amodal completion in shape formation: Some new shape phenomena. Perception, 41, pp. 1336–1354.
  64. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17–42.
  65. Robinson, J. O. (1998). The psychology of visual illusions (second edition). New York: Dover.
  66. Rock, I. (1983). The logic of perception. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  67. Sanford, E. C. & Warren, H. C. (1901). Optical illusions. In J. M. Baldwin, Dictionary of Philosophy and Psychology, pp. 206–210. Norwood, MA: Norwood Press.
  68. Shipley, T. F., & Kellman, P. J. (1992). Strength of visual interpolation depends on the ratio of physically specified to total edge length. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(1), 97–106.
  69. Singh, B., & Davis, L. S. (2018). An analysis of scale invariance in object detection snip. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 3578–3587.
  70. Singh, M., Hoffman, D. D., & Albert, M. K. (1999). Contour completion and relative depth: Petter’s rule and support ratio. Psychological Science, 10(5), 423–428. doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00
  71. Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 29–56.
  72. Su, Y., Wachtler, T. & Shi, Z. (2023). Reference induces biases in late visual processing. Scientific Report, 13, 18624. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-44827-8
  73. Ullman, S. (1996). High-level vision: Object recognition and visual cognition. MIT press.
  74. Vezzani, S. (1999). Shrinkage and expansion by amodal completion: a critical review. Perception, 28, 935–947. doi: 10.1068/p280935
  75. Vicario, G. B. (2011). Illusioni ottico-geometriche. Una rassegna di problemi. Venezia: Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti.
  76. Wertheimer, M. (1912) Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61, 161–265. English translation in L. Spillmann (Ed.), On perceived motion and figural organization. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 2012.
  77. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt, II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301–350. English translation in L. Spillmann (Ed.). On perceived motion and figural organization, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012.
  78. Whitney, D., & Yamanashi Leib, A. (2018). Ensemble perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 69(1), 105–129.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2519-5808 | Journal ISSN: 0170-057X
Language: English, German
Page range: 97 - 119
Published on: Aug 6, 2025
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2025 Walter Gerbino, published by Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.