Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Listening to Sound-based music: Defining a perceptual grammar based on morphodynamic theory Cover

Listening to Sound-based music: Defining a perceptual grammar based on morphodynamic theory

Open Access
|May 2024

References

  1. Alain, C., Arnott, S. R., Hevenor, S., Graham, S., & Grady, C. L. (2001). “What” and “where” in the human auditory system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 98(21), 12301. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.211209098
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual Symbol Systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660.
  3. Bériachvili, G. (2010). L’Espace Musical: Concept et Phénomène à travers l’Avant-Garde des Années 1950-60 (Stockhausen, Xenakis, Ligeti...). Université de Rouen.
  4. Bonnet, F. J. (2012). Les mots et les sons: Un archipel sonore. Éditions de l’éclat.
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1979). La distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Les Éditions de Minuit.
  6. Bregman, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. MIT Press.
  7. Brower, C. (1997). Pathway, Blockage, and Containment in Density 21.5. Theory and Practice, 22, 35–54.
  8. Brower, C. (2000). A Cognitive Theory Of Musical Meaning. Journal of Music Theory, 44, 323–379.
  9. Caramiaux, B., Bevilacqua, F., Bianco, T., Schnell, N., Houix, O., & Susini, P. (2014). The Role of Sound Source Perception in Gestural Sound Description. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 11(1), 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2536811
  10. Churchland, P. M. (2013). Matter and Consciousness. MIT Press.
  11. Cienki, A. (1999). Some Properties and Groupings of Image Schemas. In M. H. Verspoor, K. D. Lee & E. Sweetser (Eds.), Lexical and Syntactical constructions and the construction of meaning (pp. 3 –16). John Benjamins PublishingCompany.
  12. Clarke, E. (2005). Ways of Listening: An Ecological Approach to the Perception of Musical Meaning. Oxford UniversityPress.
  13. Cox, A. (2016). Music and Embodied Cognition. Listening, Moving, Feeling, and Thiking. Indiana University Press.
  14. Cox, C., & Warner, D. (2017). Audio Culture, Revised Edition: Readings in Modern Music (Vol. 1). Bloomsbury Publishing.
  15. Damasio, A. (2010). Self Comes to Mind: Constructing the Conscious Brain. Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
  16. Davies, S. (1994). Musical Meaning and Expression. Cornell University Press.
  17. Deil, J., Markert, N., Normand, P., Kammen, P., Küssner, M. B., & Taruffi, L. (2022). Mind-wandering during contemporary live music: An exploratory study. Musicae Scientiae, 10298649221103210. https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649221103210
  18. DeLanda, M. (2022). Materialist Phenomenology. A philosophy of Perception. Bloomsbury.
  19. Deliège, I. (1989). Approche perceptive de formes musicales contemporaines. In S. McAdams & I. Deliège (Eds.), La musique et le science cognitives (pp. 305–326). P. Mardaga.
  20. Dennett, D. C. (2017). Consciousness Explained. Hachette UK.
  21. Di Bona, E., & Santarcangelo, V. (2018). Il suono. L’esperienza uditiva e i suoi oggetti. Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  22. Di Salle, F., Esposito, F., Scarabino, T., Formisano, E., Marciano, E., Saulino, C., Cirillo, S., Elefante, R., Scheffler, K., & Seifritz, E. (2003). FMRI of the auditory system: Understanding the neural basis of auditory gestalt. Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 21(10), 1213–1224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.023
  23. Dolscheid, S., Shayan, S., Majid, A., & Casasanto, D. (2013). The Thickness of Musical Pitch: Psychophysical Evidence for Linguistic Relativity. Psychological Science, 24(5), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457374
  24. Dyson, F. (2009). Sounding New Media. Immersion and Embodyment in the Arts and Culture. University of California Press.
  25. Eitan, Z., & Granot, R. Y. (2006). How music moves: Musical parameters and listeners’ images of motion. Music Perception, 23(3), 221–247.
  26. Emmerson, S., & Landy, L. (Eds.). (2016). Expanding the Horizon of Electroacoustic Music Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  27. Fingelkurts, A. A., Fingelkurts, A. A., & Neves, C. F. H. (2010). Natural world physical, brain operational, and mind phenomenal space-time. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 195–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2010.04.001
  28. Frey, A., Daquet, A., Poitrenaud, S., Tijus, C., Fremiot, M., Formosa, M., Prod’homme, L., Mandelbrojt, J., Timsit-Berthier, M., Bootz, P., Hautbois, X., & Besson, M. (2009). Pertinence cognitive des unités sémiotiquestemporelles.Musicae Scientiae, 13(2), 415–440.
  29. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. MIT Press.
  30. Gärdenfors, P. (2000). Conceptual Spaces. The Geometry of Thought. MIT Press.
  31. Gaver, W. W. (1993). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5(1), 1–29.
  32. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach To Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin.
  33. Giordano, B. L., & McAdams, S. (2010). Sound Source Mechanics and Musical Timbre Perception: Evidence From Previous Studies. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2010.28.2.155
  34. Glover, R., Gottschalk, J., & Harrison, B. (2018). Being Time. Case Studies in Musical Temporality. Bloomsbury.
  35. Godøy, R. I. (1997). Knowledge in Music Theory by Shapes of Musical Objects and Sound-Producing Actions. In M. Leman (Ed.), Music, Gestalt, and Computing. Studies in Cognitive and Systematic Musicology ( Springer-Verlag, pp. 89–102).
  36. Godøy, R. I. (2010). Gestural Affordances of Musical Sound. In R. I. Godøy & M. Leman (Eds.), Musical Gestures: Sound, Movement, and Meaning (pp. 103–125). Routledge.
  37. Godøy, R. I. (2021). Perceiving Sound Objects in the Musique Concrète. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672949
  38. Godøy, R. I., & Jørgensen, H. (Eds.). (2001). Musical Imagery. Taylor & Francis.
  39. Grebosz-Haring, K., & Weichbold, M. (2020). Contemporary art music and its audiences: Age, gender, and social class profile. Musicae Scientiae, 24(1), 60–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864918774082
  40. Grey, J. M. (1977). Multidimensional perceptual scaling of musical timbres. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 61(5), 1270–1277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.381428
  41. Griffiths, P. (2010). Modern Music And After (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  42. Griffiths, T. D., & Warren, J. D. (2004). What is an auditory object? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(11), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1538
  43. Grisey, G. (1987). Tempus ex machina: A composer’s reflections on musical time. Contemporary Music Review, 2(1), 239–275.
  44. Hampe, B. (2008). From Perception to Meaning: Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Walter de Gruyter.
  45. Hjortkjær, J. (2015). Sound objects – Auditory objects – Musical objects. Dansk Musikforskning Online, SPECIAL EDITION, 47–56.
  46. Huron, D. B. (2006). Sweet Anticipation: Music and the Psychology of Expectation. MIT Press.
  47. Imberty, M. (2005). La musique creuse le temps. De Wagner à Boulez: Musique, psychologie, psychanalyse. L’Harmattan.
  48. Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. University of Chicago Press.
  49. Johnson, M. (2008). The Meaning of the Body: Aesthetics of Human Understanding. University of Chicago Press.
  50. Johnson, M., & Larson, S. (2003). “Something in the way she moves”—Metaphors of musical motion. Metaphor and Symbol, 18, 63–84.
  51. Joseph, S., Kumar, S., Husain, M., & Griffiths, T. D. (2015). Auditory working memory for objects vs. Features. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00013
  52. Juslin, P. N., & Sloboda, J. A. (2013). Music and Emotion. In D. Deutsch (Ed.), The Psychology of Music (Third Edition) (3rd ed., pp. 583–645). Academic Press.
  53. Kivy, P. (1991). Music Alone: Philosophical Reflections on the Purely Musical Experience. Cornell University Press.
  54. Koelsch, S., & Siebel, W. A. (2005). Towards a neural basis of music perception. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 9(12), 578–584.
  55. Kosslyn, S. M., Shephard, J. M., & Thompson, W. L. (2007). Spatial Processing during Mental Imagery: A Neurofunctional Theory. In F. Mast & L. Jäncke (Eds.), Spatial Processing in Navigation, Imagery and Perception (pp. 1–15). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71978-8_1
  56. Kozak, M. (2020). Enacting Musical Time. The Bodily Experience of New Music. Oxford University Press.
  57. Kramer, J. D. (1988). The time of music: New meanings, new temporalities, new listening strategies. Schirmer/Mosel Verlag GmbH.
  58. Krueger, J. (2014). Affordances and the musically extended mind (Vol. 1).
  59. Kubovy, M., & Van Valkenburg, D. (2001). Auditory and visual objects. Cognition, 80, 97–126.
  60. Laeng, B. (2013). Representation of Spatial Relations. In K. N. Ochsner & S. Kosslyn (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience, Volume 1: Core Topics (p. 0). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199988693.013.0003
  61. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press.
  62. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (2008). Philosophy In The Flesh (Vol. 1).
  63. Landy, L. (2007). Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. MIT Press.
  64. Larson, S. (2012). Musical Forces. Motion, Metaphor, and Meaning in Music. Indiana University Press.
  65. Larson, S., & VanHandel, L. (2005). Measuring Musical Forces. Music Perception, 23(2), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2005.23.2.119
  66. Leech-Wilkinson, D., & Prior, H. M. (Eds.). (2017). Music and Shape. Oxford University Press.
  67. Leman, M. (2008). Embodied Music Cognition and Mediation Technology. MIT Press.
  68. Lerdahl, F. (1992). Cognitive Constraints on Compositional Systems. Contemporary Music Review, 6(2), 97–121.
  69. Lerdahl, F. (2001). Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press.
  70. Lerdahl, F., & Jackendoff, R. (1983). A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. MIT Press.
  71. Lundy, T., James, C., & Reybrouck, M. (2022). Editorial: Neuroscience and new music: Assessing behavioral and cerebral aspects of its perception, cognition, induction, and entrainment. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.979570
  72. Marr, D. (1982). Vision. MIT Press.
  73. Mencke, I., Omigie, D., Wald-Fuhrmann, M., & Brattico, E. (2019). Atonal Music: Can Uncertainty Lead to Pleasure? Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 979. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00979
  74. Menger, P.-M. (2014). The Economics of Creativity. Art and Achievement under Uncertainty. Harvard University Press.
  75. Menin, D., & Schiavio, A. (2012). Rethinking Musical Affordances. AVANT, III(2), 202–215.
  76. Moore, A. (2016). Sonic Art: An Introduction to Electroacoustic Music Composition. Routledge.
  77. Noë, A. (2004). Action in Perception. MIT Press.
  78. Ockelford, A., & Sergeant, D. (2012). Musical expectancy in atonal contexts: Musicians’ perception of “ antistructure”.Psychology of Music, 41(2), 139–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735612442582
  79. Oliveros, P. (2005). Deep Listening: A Composer’s Sound Practice. Iuniverse.
  80. Petitot, J. (2011). Cognitive Morphodynamics. Dynamical Morphological Models of Constituency in Perception and Syntax. Peter Lang AG.
  81. Reybrouck, M. (2012). Musical Sense-Making and the Concept of Affordance: An Ecosemiotic and Experiential Approach. Biosemiotics, 5(3), 391–409.
  82. Reybrouck, M. (2013). Musical universals and the axiom of psychobiological equivalence. In J.-L. Leroy (Ed.), Topicality of Musical Universals / Actualité des Universaux musicaux (pp. 31–44). Editions des Archives Contemporaines.
  83. Reybrouck, M. (2020). Musical Sense-Making: Enaction, Experience, and Computation. Taylor & Francis.
  84. Ridley, A. (2004). The Philosophy of Music: Theme and Variations. Edinburgh University Press.
  85. Rocchesso, D., & Fontana, F. (Eds.). (2003). The Sounding Object. GNU Free Documentation License.
  86. Roy, S. (2003). L’Analyse des Musiques Électroacoustiques: Modèles et Propositions. L’Harmattan.
  87. Santarcangelo, V., & Wanke, R. (2020). The Early Stage of Perception of Contemporary Art Music: A matter of time. Organised Sound, 25(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355771820000047
  88. Schaeffer, P. (1966). Traité des Objets Musicaux. Seuil.
  89. Scruton, R. (1997). The Aesthetics of Music. Oxford University Press.
  90. Schulze, K., & Koelsch, S. (2012). Working memory for speech and music. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1252, 229–236.
  91. Shamma, S. (2001). On the role of space and time in auditory processing. TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences, 5(8), 340–348.
  92. Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The Primacy of Movement. John Benjamins.
  93. Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00052432
  94. Snyder, B. (2001). Music and Memory. MIT Press.
  95. Solomos, M. (2019). From Music to Sound: The Emergence of Sound in 20th- and 21st-Century Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  96. Solomos, M. (2023). Exploring the Ecologies of Music and Sound: Environmental, Mental and Social Ecologies in Music, Sound Art and Artivisms. Routledge, Taylor & Francis. https://www.routledge.com/Exploring-the-Ecologies-of-Music-and-Sound-Environmental-Mental-and-Social/Solomos/p/book/9781032184234
  97. Spence, C. (2011). Crossmodal correspondences: A tutorial review (Vol. 1).
  98. Tenney, J. (2015). From Scratch: Writings in Music Theory (Vol. 1).
  99. Van de Cruys, S., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Gestalts as predictions—Some reflections and an application to art. Gestalt Theory, 33(3–4), 325–344.
  100. Van der Schyff, D., Schiavio, A., & Elliott, D. J. (2022). Musical Bodies, Musical Minds. MIT Press.
  101. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The Embodied Mind. MIT Press.
  102. Viel, M. (2019). Listening Patterns. From Music to Perception and Cognition.Lap Lambert Academic Publishing. Voegelin, S. (2014). Sonic Possible Worlds. Hearing the Continuum of Sound. Bloomsbury.
  103. Wagner, K., & Dobkins, K. R. (2011). Synaesthetic Associations Decrease During Infancy. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1067–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611416250
  104. Wanke, R. (2019). A unified approach to perceiving sound in current experimental music genres. Filigrane. Musique, Esthétique, Sciences, Société., 23. https://revues.mshparisnord.fr/filigrane/index.php?id=879
  105. Wanke, R. (2021). Sound in the Ecstatic-Materialist Perspective on Experimental Music. Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  106. Wanke, R. (2022). Listening Survey – figshare. DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.21590658.v3
  107. Wanke, R., Camci, A., Noble, J. D. K., & Lembke, S.-A. (2018). Symposium: What do we hear in contemporary and experimental music? New answers to an old question. ICMPC15/ESCO10. International Conference on Music Perception and Cognition, Graz (AU), Montreal (CA).
  108. Wanke, R., & Santarcangelo, V. (2021). Memory as the Aspatial Domain for the Perception of Certain Genres of Contemporary Art Music. Music & Science, 4, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059204321997658
  109. Windsor, L. W. (2000). Through and around the acousmatic: The interpretation of electroacoustic sounds. In S. Emmerson (Ed.), Music, Electronic Media and Culture (pp. 7–35). Ashgate.
  110. Windsor, L. W., & de Bézenac, C. (2012). Music and affordances. Musicae Scientiae, 16(1), 102–120.
  111. Zbikowski, L. M. (2002). Conceptualizing Music: Cognitive Structure, Theory, and Analysis (Vol. 1). Oxford UniversityPress.
  112. Zbikowski, L. M. (2008). Metaphor and music. In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (pp. 502–524). Cambridge University Press.
  113. Zbikowski, L. M. (2010). Foundations of Musical Grammar (Vol. 1). Oxford University Press.
  114. Zbikowski, L. M. (2017). Music, Analogy and Metaphor. In The Routledge COmpanion to Music Cognition (pp. 501–512). Routledge.
  115. Zuckerkandl, V. (1969). Sound and Symbol: Music and the External World. Princeton University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2023-0017 | Journal eISSN: 2519-5808 | Journal ISSN: 0170-057X
Language: English, German
Page range: 199 - 223
Published on: May 2, 2024
Published by: Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2024 Riccardo D. Wanke, published by Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.