References
- Battcock, G. (1968). Questions to Stella and Judd. interview by Bruce Glaser. In G. Battcock (Ed.). Minimal Art: A Critical Anthology (pp. 148–164). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Braddick, O. (2018). Illusion research: An infantile disorder? Perception, 47(8), 805–806. doi:10.1177/0301006618774658
- Denis, M. (1890). Définition du néo-traditionalisme. Art et Critique. Cited in Bouillon, J.-P. (2006). Maurice Denis: Le spirituel dans l’art (in French, p. 21). Paris, France: Gallimard.
- De Winter, S. (2020). Flattened Intensities: An Empirically Informed Assessment of Frank Stella’s Fluorescent Paintings from the Sixties. [PhD Thesis]. KU Leuven.
- De Winter, S., Moors, P., Van Gelder, H., & Wagemans, J. (2018). Illusory depth based on interactions between fluorescent and conventional colours: A case study on Frank Stella’s Irregular Polygons paintings. Art & Perception, 6(2–3), 116–150. doi:10.1163/22134913-20181093
- De Winter, S., Vissers, N., Bossens, C., & Wagemans, J. (2020). Instantaneous art? Investigating Frank Stella’s Moroccan paintings with a short-exposure-experiment. Art & Perception, 8(2), 121–157. doi:10.1163/22134913-bja10001
- De Winter, S., & Wagemans, J. (2022). Tracking Frank Stella: An empirical evaluation of art-historical issues in an eye-movement and questionnaire study. Art & Perception. doi:10.1163/22134913-bja10038
- Elkins, J. (2003). What Happened to Art Criticism? Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
- Fried, M. (1965). Three American Painters: Kenneth Noland, Jules Olitski, Frank Stella. exhibition catalogue. Cambridge: Fogg Art Museum.
- Fried, M. (1998). Shape as form: Frank Stella’s new paintings. In M. Fried (Ed.), Art and Objecthood: Essays and Reviews. pp. 77–99). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1966).
- Greenberg, C. (1993). The case for abstract art. In J. O’Brian (Ed.), The Collected Essays and Criticism, Vol. 4, Modernism with a Vengeance 1957-1969 (pp. 75–84). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. (Original publication 1959).
- Judd, D. (1965). Specific objects. Contemporary Sculpture: Art Yearbook, 8, 74–82.
- Kandinsky, W. (1912). Über das Geistige in der Kunst, insbesondere in der Malerei. München, Germany: R. Piper.
- Kennedy, B. P. (2010). Frank Stella: Irregular Polgons, 1965-1966 (exhibition catalogue). Hanover, NH: Dartmouth College, Hood Museum of Art.
- Koenderink, J. (2014). The all seeing eye? Perception, 43, 1–6. doi:10.1068/p4301ed
- Koenderink, J. (2017). Visual illusions. In A. G. Shapiro & D. Todorović (Eds.), The Oxford Compendium of Visual Illusions (pp. 119–138). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2017). Colors of the sublunar. i-Perception, 8(5), 1–30. doi:10.1177/2041669517733484
- Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (2022). The space of colour & the colour of space. Gestalt Theory, in press.
- Koenderink, J. J., van Doorn, A. J., Albertazzi, L., & Wagemans, J. (2015). Hue contrast and the sense of space. i–Perception, 8, 67–85. doi:10.1068/i0701
- Krauss, R. (1968). On frontality. Artforum, 5, 40–46.
- Küng, M. (Ed.). (2019). Pieter Vermeersch—Variations. Brussels, Belgium: Ludion.
- Linden, C., & Wagemans, J. (2021). Presenting TaMuNaBe: A taxonomy of museum navigation behaviours. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, in press. doi:10.1037/aca0000413
- Pagel, R. (2017). The duality of picture perception and the robustness of perspective. Art & Perception, 5(3), 233–261. doi:10.1163/22134913-00002065
- Pepperell, R. (2015). Artworks as dichotomous objects: Implications for the scientific study of aesthetic experience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 295. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00295
- Quétard, B., Linden, C., De Winter, S., & Wagemans, J. (2022, August). Uncovering modes of viewing abstract art works in museum contexts by analysing eye movements with hidden Markov models. In Poster Presented at the Visual Science of Arts Conference (VSAC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Rose, B. (1967). American Art Since 1900: A Critical History. New York, NY: Praeger.
- Shapiro, A. (2018). Visual illusions: Nothing to lose but your chains—A reply to Oliver Braddick. Perception, 47(9), 901–904. doi:10.1177/0301006618785964
- Todorovic, D. (2018). In defence of illusions: A reply to Braddick. Perception 47(9), 905–908. doi:10.1177/0301006618787613
- Todorović, D. (2020). What are visual illusions? Perception, 49(11), 1128–1199. doi:10.1177/0301006620962279
- van Buren, B., & Scholl, B. J. (2018). Visual illusions as a tool for dissociating seeing from thinking: A reply to Braddick (2018). Perception, 47(10–11), 999–1001. doi:10.1177/0301006618796348
- Wagemans, J. (2015). Historical and conceptual background: Gestalt theory. In J. Wagemans (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization (pp. 3–20). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Wagemans, J. (2018). Perceptual organization. In J. T. Wixted (Series Ed.) & J. Serences (Vol. Ed.), The Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience: Vol. 2. Sensation, Perception & Attention (Chapter 18, pp. 803–872). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
- Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012a). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333
- Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J. R., van der Helm, P., & van Leeuwen, C. (2012b). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252. doi:10.1037/a0029334