References
- Andre Paurñfeyndt (n.d.). In Wiktenauer (C. Trosclair, Trans.). Retrieved from https://wiktenauer.com/wiki/Andre_Paur%C3%B1feyndt (Accessed January 4, 2020).
- Anglo, S. (2000). The martial arts of renaissance Europe. London, UK: Yale University Press.
- Basing, P. (1990). Trades and crafts in medieval manuscripts. New Amsterdam, UK: British Library.
- Burkart, E. (2016). Limits of understanding in the study of lost martial arts. Acta Periodica Duellatorum, 4(2), 5–30.
- Cinato, F. (2016). Development, diffusion and reception of the “Buckler Play”: A case study of a fighting art in the Making. In D. Jaquet, K. Verelst, T. Dawson (Eds.), Late medieval and early modern fight books. Transmission and tradition of martial arts in Europe (14th–17th centuries) (pp. 481–546). Leiden-Boston, Netherlands: Brill.
- Farrell, K. (2017). The Kölner Fechtbuch: Context and comparison. Acta Periodica Duellatorum, 7(1), 203–235.
- Fior di Battaglia (n.d.). In Wiktenauer (C. Hatcher, Trans.). Retrieved from https://wiktenauer.com/wiki/Fior_di_Battaglia_(MS_Ludwig_XV_13). (Accessed January 4, 2020)
- Heider, F. (1959). Thing and medium. On perception and event structure, and the psychological environment. Psychological Issues, 1(Monograph 3), 1–34.
- Hils, H.-P. (1985). Meister Johann Liechtenauer Kunst des Fechtens. Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany: Peter Lang.
- Isaac, A. M. C. (2019). The allegory of isomorphism. AVANT – Trends in Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), doi: 10.26913/avant.2019.02.05
- Jaquet, D. (2016). Experimenting historical European martial arts, a scientific method? In D. Jaquet, K. Verelst, T. Dawson (Eds.), Late medieval and early modern fight books. Transmission and tradition of martial arts in Europe (14th–17th centuries) (pp. 216–243). Leiden-Boston, Netherlands: Brill.
- Kleinau, J. P. (2016). Visualised motion: Iconography of medieval and renaissance fencing books. In D. Jaquet, K. Verelst, T. Dawson (Eds.), Late medieval and early modern fight books. Transmission and tradition of martial arts in Europe (14th–17th centuries) (pp. 88–116). Leiden-Boston, Netherlands: Brill.
- Köhler, W. (1938). The place of value in the world of facts. New York, NY: Liveright.
- Ławrynowicz, O., & Nowakowski, P. A. (2009). Stove tiles as a source of knowledge about mediaeval and early modern arms and armour. Studies in Post-Medieval Archaeology, 3, 303–316.
- Lehar, S. (1999). Gestalt isomorphism and the quantification of spatial perception. Gestalt Theory, 21, 122–139.
- Löwgren, J., & Stolterman, E. (2004). Thoughtful interaction design: A design perspective on information technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Paulus Hector Mair (n.d.). In Wiktenauer (K. P. Myers & P. M. Haaland, Trans.). Retrieved from https://wiktenauer.com/wiki/Paulus_Hector_Mair. (Accessed January 4, 2020).
- Paulus Kal (n.d.). In Wiktenauer (C. Winslow, Trans.). Retrieved from https://wiktenauer.com/wiki/Paulus_Kal. (Accessed January 4, 2020).
- Spatz, B. (2015). What a body can do. Technique as knowledge, practice as research. London, UK: Routledge.
- Spelke, E. S. (1990). Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 29–56.
- Spotlight. A Taste of TEFAF Maastricht (2018). Retrieved from https://guenther-rarebooks.com/usr/documents/spotlights/document_url/49/spotlight-taste-of-tefaf-2018-miniatures.pdf
- Steinman, R. M., Pizlo, Z., & Pizlo, F. J. (2000). Phi is not beta, and why Wertheimer’s discovery launched the Gestalt revolution. Vision Research, 40(17), 2257–2264.
- Tilley, C. (2014). Material culture and text: the art of ambiguity. London, UK: Routledge.
- Tobler, C. H. (2006). In service of the duke: The 15th century fighting treatise of Paulus Kal. Highland Village, TX: Chivalry Bookshelf.
- Tobolka, M. (2016). Paulus Hector Mair (ca 1517–1579). Studia Historica Nitriensia, 20(2), 525–530.
- Ventrone, P. (1991). On the use of figurative art as a source for the study of medieval pectacles. Comparative Drama, 25(1), 4–16.
- Welle, R. (1993). “…und wisse das alle höbischeit kompt von deme ringen”. Der Ringkampf als adelige Kunst im 15. Und 16. Jahrhundert. Eine sozialhistorische und bewegungsbiographische Interpretation aufgrund der Handschriften und gedruckten Ringlehren des Spätmittelalters. Forum für Sozialgeschichte, 4, 243–253.
- Żygulski, Z. (1984). Armour as a symbolic form. Waffen und Kostümkunde, 26, 77–96.