References
- de Gelder, B. (2017). Going native. Emotion science in the twenty-first century. Frontiers in Psychology, 8,1212.
- Firestone, C., & Scholl, B. J. (2016). Cognition does not affect perception: Evaluating the evidence for top-down effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, 1–72.
- Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243–259.
- Ihde, D. (2012). Experimental phenomenology: Multistabilities, 2nd edn. New York: SUNY Press.
- Mély, D. A., Linsley, D., & Serre, T. (2018). Complementary surrounds explain diverse contextual phenomena across visual modalities. Psychological Review, 125(5), 769–784.
- Niveleau, C. E., & Métraux, A. (2015) (Eds.). The bounds of naturalism: experimental constraints and phenomenological requiredness. Philosophia Scientiae, Special Issue, 19(3).
- Parovel, G., Guidi, S., & Kreß, K. (2018). Different contexts change the impression of animacy. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 553–563.
- Reeves, A., & Pinna, B. (2017). Editorial: The future of perceptual illusions: From phenomenology to neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 9.
- Scholl, B. J., & Gao, T. (2013). Perceiving animacy and intentionality: Visual processing or higher-level judgment? In: M. D. Rutherford & V. A. Kuhlmeier (Eds.), Social perception: detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention (pp. 197–230). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Searle, J. (2015). Seeing things as they are. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Spillmann, L. (2009). Phenomenology and neurophysiological correlations: Two approaches to perception research. Vision Research 49, 1507–152.
- Thinès, G., Costall, A., & Butterworth G. (Eds.) (2014). Michotte’s experimental phenomenology of perception, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.
- Wagemans, J., van Lier, R., & Scholl, B. J. (2006). Introduction to Michotte’s heritage in perception and cognition research. Acta Psychologica, 123, 1–19.