Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Thinking, Experiencing and Rethinking Mereological Interdependence Cover

Thinking, Experiencing and Rethinking Mereological Interdependence

Open Access
|May 2019

References

  1. Albertazzi, L. (2015). A science of qualities. Biological Theory, 10, 188–199.
  2. Anjum, R., & Mumford, S. (2017) Emergence and Demergence. In: M. Paoletti & F. Orilia (Eds.) Philosophical and Scientific Perspectives on Downward Causation (pp. 92–109). New York, London: Routledge.
  3. Arnheim, R. (1974). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Ash, M. G. (1985). Gestalt psychology: Origins in Germany and reception in the United States. In: C. E. Buxton (Ed.), Points of view in the modern history of psychology (pp. 295–344). Orlando e.a.: Academic Press.
  5. Bischof, N. (1966). Erkenntnistheoretische Grundlagenprobleme der Wahrnehmungspsychologie. In: W. Metzger (Ed.) Handbuch der Psychologie. In 12 Bänden. Bd. 1 (pp. 27–78). Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie.
  6. Brdar-Szabó, R., & Brdar, M. (2011) What do metonymic chains reveal about the nature of metonymy? In: F. de Mendoza, R. Benczes & A. Barcelona (Eds.) Defining metonymy in cognitive linguistics: Towards a consensus view (pp. 217–248). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  7. Gabriel, M. (2018). Der Sinn des Denkens. Berlin: Ullstein.
  8. Harrington, A. (1996). Reenchanted science: holism in German culture from Wilhelm 2 to Hitler. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  9. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.
  10. Hoffman, D., Richards, W. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65–96.
  11. Husserl, E. (2001). Logical Investigations. London, New York: Routledge.
  12. Husserl, E. (2003). Philosophy of arithmetic: Psychological and logical investigations with supplementary texts from 1887-1901. Dordrecht: Springer.
  13. Koenderink, J. (2012). Visual awareness. Utrecht: De Clootcrans Press.
  14. Koestler, A. (1970). Beyond atomism and holism - the concept of the holon. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 13(2), 131–154.
  15. Koffka, K. (1922). Perception: an introduction to the Gestalt-Theory. The Psychological Bulletin, 19(10), 531–585.
  16. Köhler, W. (1939). The place of value in a world of facts. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
  17. Lee, T. S., & Mumford, D. (2003). Hierarchical Bayesian inference in the visual cortex. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 20(7), 1434–1448.
  18. Leisegang, H. (1951). Denkformen. Berlin: W. de Gruyter.
  19. McCulloch, W. (1945). A heterarchy of values determined by the topology of nervous nets. Bulletin of Mathematical Biophysics, 7, 89–93.
  20. Metzger, W. (2001). Psychologie. Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung des Experiments. Vienna: Krammer.
  21. Næss, A., & Haukeland, P. I. (2002). Life’s philosophy: Reason & feeling in a deeper world. Athens, London: University of Georgia Press.
  22. Pind, Jörgen L. (2014). Edgar rubin and psychology in Denmark: Figure and ground. Dordrecht e.a.: Springer.
  23. Pinna, B. (2010). New Gestalt principles of perceptual organization: An extension from grouping to shape and meaning. Gestalt Theory, 32(1), 11–78.
  24. Pinna, B. (2011). What is the meaning of shape? Gestalt Theory, 33(3/4), 383–422.
  25. Pinna, B., & Albertazzi, L. (2010). From grouping to visual meanings: A new theory of perceptual organization. In: L. Albertazzi, G. J. van Tonder, & D. Vishwanath (Eds.) Perception beyond inference: The information content of visual processes (pp. 287–344). Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
  26. Pinna, B., & Reeves, A. (2009). From perception to art: How vision creates meanings. Spatial Vision, 22(3), 225–272.
  27. Pomerantz, J. R., Cragin, A. I. (2015). Emergent features and feature combination. In: J. Wagemans (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Perceptual Organization (pp. 88–107). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  28. Radden, G., & Kövecses, Z. (1999). Towards a theory of metonymy. In: K.-U. Panther, & G. Radden (Eds.) Metonymy in language and thought (pp. 17–60). Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
  29. Rausch, E. (1967). Über Summativität und Nichtsummativität. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
  30. Rubin, E. (1921). Visuell wahrgenommene Figuren. Studien in psychologischer Analyse. Kopenhagen e.a.: Gyldendalske Boghandel.
  31. Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). The role of mappings and domains in understanding metonymy. In: A. Barcelona (Ed.) Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective (pp. 109–132). Berlin: de Gruyter.
  32. Simons, P. M. (1982). The formalisation of Husserl’s theory of wholes and parts. In: B. Smith (Ed.) Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology (pp. 113–159). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.
  33. Smith, B. (1988). Gestalt theory: An essay in philosophy. Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.
  34. Smith, B. (1994). Austrian philosophy: The Legacy of Franz Brentano. Chicago, LaSalle: Open Court.
  35. Smith, B., & Mulligan, K. (1982). Pieces of a theory. In: B. Smith (Ed.), Parts and moments: Studies in logic and formal ontology (pp. 15–109). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.
  36. Smith, B., & Smith, D. W. (1995). Introduction. In: B. Smith, & D. W. Smith (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to Husserl (pp. 1–44). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Sokolowski, R. (2000). Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Ströker, E. (2009). Husserls Logische Untersuchungen. Ein Werk des Durchbruchs zur Phänomenologie. In: E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen (pp. xxvii–lxxiii). Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
  39. Stumpf, C. (1873). Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung. Leipzig: S. Hirzel.
  40. van der Helm, P. (2012). Cognitive architecture of perceptual organization: From neurons to gnosons. Cognitive Processing, 13, 13–40.
  41. van der Helm, P. (2017). Human visual perceptual organization beats thinking on speed. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79, 1227–1238.
  42. Varzi, A. C. (2016). Mereology. In: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mereology/(last visited 1 October 2018).
  43. Von Ehrenfels, C. (1988). On ‘gestalt qualities.’ In: B. Smith (Ed.), Foundations of Gestalt theory (pp. 82-117). Munich, Vienna: Philosophia.
  44. Wagemans, J., Feldman, J., Gepshtein, S., Kimchi, R., Pomerantz, J., van der Helm, P., van Leeuwen, C. (2012). A century of gestalt psychology in visual perception II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1218–1252.
  45. Wertheimer, M. (1938). The general theoretical situation (Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt I). In: W. D. Ellis (Ed.) A source book of gestalt psychology (pp. 12–16). Abingdon: Routledge.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gth-2019-0003 | Journal eISSN: 2519-5808 | Journal ISSN: 0170-057X
Language: English, German
Page range: 31 - 46
Published on: May 13, 2019
Published by: Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2019 Michael W. Stadler, published by Society for Gestalt Theory and its Applications (GTA)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.