Global governance and data ethics challenges in the context of digital transformation
By: Marja Nesterova and Olena Yatsenko
References
- Ackoff, R. L., 1989. From data to wisdom. Journal of applied systems analysis, 16(1), 3-9.
- Amin, H., Zaman, A., Tok, E. (2023). Education for sustainable development and global citizenship education in the GCC: a systematic literature review. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2023.2265846
- Bellaby, R. Developing an ethical framework for intelligence-AI. AI Ethics 6, 229 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-026-01076-5
- CEPS Task Force on the Apply AI Strategy. Translating Europe’s AI ambition into industrial reality (2026). [Online] Available: https://cdn.ceps.eu/2026/05/CEPS-Apply-AI-Strategy_Full-Prospectus.pdf
- Diesen, G. (2021). Great power politics in the fourth industrial revolution: The geoeconomics of technological sovereignty. Bloomsbury Publishing. 273 p.
- Dignum, V. (2019). Responsible artificial intelligence: How to develop and use ai in a responsible way. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30371-6
- European Commission. (2024). European Digital Identity. https://digitalstrategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/european-digital-identity
- European Commission.: Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence, European Commission, Brussels (2019)
- European Commission (2021) Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-downharmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence Global Governance.https://www.wzb.eu/en/research/international-politics-and-law/global-governance - Accessed on 15 Juni, 2026.
- Global Governance Institute. (2026). Accessed on June 15, 2026, from https://www.globalgovernance.eu
- Driessen, S. W., Monsieur, G., Van den Heuvel, W. J. (2022). Data market design: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 10, 33123–33153
- Durante, M. (2010). The value of information as ontological pluralism. Knowledge, Technology Policy, 23(1), 149-161.
- Dworkin, R. (2013). Taking Rights Seriously. AC Black
- Ernst, L. E., Matter, P. (2025). The ethical innovator: bridging the gap for integrating ethics into digital innovation practice. Journal of Responsible Innovation, 12(1), 2476246.
- European Union. (2016). Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation). Official Journal of the
- European Union, L 119, 1–88. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
- Floridi, L. (2016). On human dignity as a foundation for the right to privacy. Philosophy Technology, 29(4), 307–312.
- Fratini, S., Hine, E., Novelli, C., Roberts, H., Floridi, L. (2024). Digital sovereignty: A descriptive analysis and a critical evaluation of existing models. Digital Society, 3(3), 59
- Gogoll, J., Zuber, N., Kacianka, S., Greger, T., Pretschner, A., Nida-Rümelin, J. (2021). Ethics in the software development process: from codes of conduct to ethical deliberation. Philosophy Technology, 34(4), 1085-1108.
- Gotoh, R. (2021). The ethics and economics of the capability approach. Springer.
- Haney, B.S. (2023). Applied artificial intelligence in modern warfare and national security policy. Hastings Sci. Technol. Law J. 11, 1–64. (64)
- Harari, Y. N. (2017) Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature 550, 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1038/550324a
- Ivey, M. (2020). The ethical midfield in artificial intelligence: practical reflections for national security lawyers. Geo. J. Leg. Ethics 33, 109–144. (114.)
- Hicks, J. (2023). The future of data ownership: An uncommon research agenda. The Sociological Review, 71(3), 544–560.
- Hummel, P., Braun, M., Dabrock, P. (2021). Own data? Ethical reflections on data ownership. Philosophy Technology, 34(3), 545–572
- Jankowski, P., Höfner, A., Hoffmann, M. L., Rohde, F., Rehak, R. Graf, J. (Eds.) (2023). Shaping Digital Transformation for a Sustainable Society. Contributions from Bits Bäume. Technische Universität Berlin. https://doi.org/10.14279/depositonce-17526
- Kraus, S.; Jones, P.; Kailer, N.; Weinmann, A.; Chaparro-Banegas, N.; Roig-Tierno, N. Digital Transformation: An Overview of the Current State of the Art of Research. Sage Open 2021, 11, https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211047576
- Korea–World Bank Group Global Digital Knowledge Center (2025). Korea Brochure https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/korea/brief/korea-world-bank-global-digital-knowledgecenter
- National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Digital identity guidelines (Special Publication 800-63-3). U.S. Department of Commerce. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.800-63-3
- Marshall A., Principles of Economics: Unabridged Eights Edition (Cosimo Classics, 2009
- Majchrzak, A., Markus, M. L., Wareham, J. (2016). Designing for Digital Transformation: Lessons for Information Systems Research from the Study of ICT and Societal Challenges. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 267–277.
- Martin, K. (2016). Understanding privacy online: Development of a social contract approach to privacy. Journal of Business Ethics, 137(3), 551–569
- Martin N. (2026). Anthropic cuts top-tier AI access after US foreigner ban. Accessed on 15 June 2026. https://www.dw.com/en/anthropic-cuts-top-tier-ai-access-after-us-foreigner-ban/a-77534688
- Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature machine intelligence, 1(11), 501-507.
- Morley, J., Kinsey, L., Elhalal, A. et al. Operationalising (2023). AI ethics: barriers, enablers and next steps. AI Soc 38, 411–423 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01308-8
- Nesterova M. (2026). Education and Global Governance: challenges of digital age (in Ukr.). New Collegium. 2. 23. https://doi.org/10.34142/nc.2026.2.23.
- Nicoli, N., Iosifidis, P. (2023). EU digital economy competition policy: From ex-post to ex-ante. The case of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, and Meta. Global Media and China, 8(1), 24-38.
- Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Enhancing access to and sharing of data: Reconciling risks and benefits for data re-use across societies. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/276aaca8-en
- Pasquale, F. (2015). The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information. Harvard University Press.
- Pham, A., Castro, C. (2019). The moral limits of the market: the case of consumer scoring data. Ethics and Information Technology, 21(2), 117–126.
- Purtova, N., van Maanen, G. (2024). Data as an economic good, data as a commons, and data governance. Law, Innovation and Technology, 16(1), 1-42.
- Satz, D. (2010). Why some things should not be for sale: The moral limits of markets. Oxford University Press, p. 3
- Savić, D. (2019). From Digitization, through Digitalization, to Digital Transformation. 43/2019. 36-39
- Schmidt, E. ‘Final Report’ National Security Commission on AI, 2023, https://www.nscai.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2021/03/Full-Report-Digital-1.pdf
- Schwab, K. (2016). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
- Sigfrids A, Leikas J, Salo-Pöntinen H, Koskimies E. (2023). Human-centricity in AI governance: A systemic approach. Front Artif Intell. 2023 Feb 14;6:976887. doi: 10.3389/frai.2023.976887. PMID: 36872934; PMCID: PMC9979257.
- Smichowski, B. C. (2018). Determinants of coopetition through data sharing in MaaS. Management Data Science, p. 20
- Stahl, B. C. (2025). The Ethics of Data and Its Governance: A Discourse Theoretical Approach. Information, 16(6), 497. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16060497
- Søe, S. O., Mai, J. E. (2023). The ethics of sharing: privacy, data, and common goods. Digital Society, 2(2), 28
- Solove, D. J. (2010). Understanding Privacy. Harvard University Press
- Spiekermann, S., Böhme, R., Acquisti, A., Hui, K. L. (2015). Personal data markets. Electronic Markets, 25(2), 91–93
- Spulber D., Figus A., (2022) The competence leadership from philosophical and political direction and the challenges iin education, Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal, vol.5, no.2, 2022, pp.93-102. https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2022-0016
- University of Graz. (2026). Section of Global Governance. Available at: https://globalgovernance.uni-graz.at/en/ (accessed 15 June 2026).
- Verhoef, P.C.; Broekhuizen, T.; Bart, Y.; Bhattacharya, A.; Qi Dong, J.; Fabian, N.; Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital Transformation: A Multidisciplinary Reflection and Research Agenda. J. Bus. Res. 2021, 122, 889–901
- Vinuesa, R., Azizpour, H., Leite, I., Balaam, M., Dignum, V., Domisch, S., Felländer, A., Langhans, S. D., Tegmark, M., Fuso Nerini, F. (2020). The role of artificial intelligence in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Nature Communications, 11(233), 1–10.
- Virkar, S., Viale Pereira, G., Vignoli, M. (2019, July) Investigating the social, political, economic and cultural implications of data trading. In: International Conference on Electronic Government (pp. 215-229). Cham: Springer International Publishing
- Wessel, L.; Baiyere, A.; Ologeanu-Taddei, R.; Cha, J.; Blegind-Jensen, T. Unpacking the Difference between Digital Transformation and IT-Enabled Organizational Transformation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 2021, 22, 102–129
- White, M. (2012). Digital workplaces: Vision and reality. Business Information Review, 29(4), 205–214. https://doi.org/10.1177/026638211247041
- Wörsdörfer, M. (2022). Big tech and antitrust: An ordoliberal analysis. Philosophy Technology, 35(3), 65.
- Zech, H. (2020). Information als Schutzgegenstand. Mohr Siebeck
- Zeleny, M. (1987). Management support systems: Towards integrated knowledge management. Human systems management, 7(1), 59-70)
- Zygmuntowski, J. O. (2023). Data governance in a trilemma: A qualitative analysis of rights, values, and goals in building data commons. Digital Society, 2(2), 30
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 148
Published on: Jul 4, 2026
Published by: DISFOR University of Genova, International Institute of Management IMI-Nova and Fondazione Sicurezza e libertà
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2026 Marja Nesterova, Olena Yatsenko, published by DISFOR University of Genova, International Institute of Management IMI-Nova and Fondazione Sicurezza e libertà
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.