Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The role of media in community resilience: Hindsight bias in media narratives after the 2014 Genoa flood Cover

The role of media in community resilience: Hindsight bias in media narratives after the 2014 Genoa flood

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Bronfman, N. C., Cisternas, P. C., López-Vázquez, E., Cifuentes, L. A. (2016). Trust and risk perception of natural hazards: implications for risk preparedness in Chile. Natural Hazards, 81, 307-327.10.1007/s11069-015-2080-4
  2. Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. New York: Collins.
  3. Covello, V.T. (2009). Strategies for overcoming challenges to effective risk communication. In R.L. Heath, H.D., O’Hair (Eds.) Handbook of risk and crisis communication. London, New York: Routledge.
  4. Dejoy, D.M. (2005). Attitudes and beliefs. In M.S. Wogalter, D.M. Dejoy, K.R, Laughery (eds.). Warnings and risk communication. London, New York: Taylor and Francis.
  5. Dekker, S.W.A. (2007). Just Culture. Balancing safety and accountability. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  6. Dekker, S.W.A. (2011). Drift into failure. From hunting broken components to understanding complex systems. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  7. Fischhoff, B. (1975). Hindsight =/ foresight: The effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 288–299.10.1037/0096-1523.1.3.288
  8. Fischhoff, B. (1982a). Debiasing. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 422–444.10.1017/CBO9780511809477.032
  9. Fischhoff, B. (1982b). For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 332–351.10.1017/CBO9780511809477.024
  10. Goodwill, A. M., Alison, L. A., Lehmann, R., Francis, A., & Eyre, M. (2010). The impact of outcome knowledge, role, and quality of information on the perceived legitimacy of lethal force decisions in counter-terrorism operations. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 28, 337–350.10.1002/bsl.897
  11. Hansen, A. Cottle, S., Negrine, R. & Newbold, C. (1998). Mass Communication Research Methods. New York, Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-26485-8
  12. Holden, R.J. (2009). People or systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer. Professional Safety, 12, 34-41.
  13. Hollnagel, E. (2014). Safety-I and Safety-II. The past and future of safety management. Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  14. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D., Leveson, N. (2006). Resilience Engineering, Aldershot, England: Ashgate.
  15. Hugh, T. B., & Dekker, S.W.A. (2009). Hindsight bias and outcome bias in the social construction of medical negligence: A review. 16 JLM, 846-857.
  16. Janmaimool, P. & Watanabe, T. (2014). Evaluating Determinants of Environmental Risk Perception for Risk Management in Contaminated Sites. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 6291-6313; doi:10.3390/ijerph11060629110.3390/ijerph110606291407858024937530
  17. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  18. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A., Slovic, P. (1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics & Biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511809477
  19. Kitzinger, J. (1999) Researching risk and the media. Health, Risk & Society. 1 (1), 55–69.10.1080/13698579908407007
  20. Larrick, R. P. (2004). Debiasing. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.). Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Oxford, England: Blackwell, 316–337.10.1002/9780470752937.ch16
  21. Lundgren, R.E., & McMakin, A.H. (2009). Risk communication. A handbook for communicating environmental, safety and health risks. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9780470480120
  22. Nestler, S., Blank, H., & von Collani, G. (2008). Hindsight bias doesn’t always come easy: Causal models, cognitive effort, and creeping determinism. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1043–1054.10.1037/0278-7393.34.5.104318763890
  23. Paton, D. (2008). Risk communication and natural hazard mitigation: How trust influences its effectiveness. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 8(1/2), 2–15.10.1504/IJGENVI.2008.017256
  24. Poortinga, W., & Pidgeon, N.F. (2003). Exploring the dimensionality of trust in risk regulation. Risk Analysis, 23(5), 961–972.10.1111/1539-6924.00373
  25. Raaijmakers, R., Krywkow, J. R., & van der Veen, A. (2008). Flood risk perceptions and spatial multi-criteria analysis-An exploratory research for hazard mitigation. Natural Hazards, 46, 307-322. DOI 10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z10.1007/s11069-007-9189-z
  26. Renn, O. & Rohrmann, B. (2000). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception Research: State and Challenges. In O. Renn & B. Rohrmann (eds.). Cross-Cultural Risk Perception. A Survey of Empirical Studies. Dordrecht and Boston, pp. 211-233.10.1007/978-1-4757-4891-8_6
  27. Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148.10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133
  28. Roese, N. J. & Vohs, K. D. (2012). Hindsight Bias. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 411-426.10.1177/1745691612454303
  29. Ross, L. (1977). The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process, in L. Berkowitz, Advances in experimental social psychology, 10. New York: Academic Press, pp. 173–22010.1016/S0065-2601(08)60357-3
  30. Saldana, J. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, Sage.
  31. Schwarz, N. A. K., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 127–161.10.1016/S0065-2601(06)39003-X
  32. SeBlank, H., & Nestler, S. (2007). Cognitive Process Models of Hinsight Bias. Social Cognition, 25(1), 132–147.10.1521/soco.2007.25.1.132
  33. Siegrist, M., & Cvetkovich, G. (2000). Perception of hazards: The role of social trust and knowledge. Risk Analysis, 20(5), 713–719.10.1111/0272-4332.20506411110217
  34. Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). Flooding risks. A comparison of lay people’s perceptions and expert’s assessments in Switzerland. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 971–979.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2006.00792.x16948689
  35. Silvestro, F., Rebora, N., Giannoni, F., Cavall, A., Ferraris, L. (2015). The flash flood of the Bisagno Creek on 9th October 2014: An “unfortunate” combination of spatial and temporal scales. Journal of Hydrology, 541(A), 50-62.10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.004
  36. Slovic, P. (1999). Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield. Risk Analysis, 198(4), 689-701.10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00439.x
  37. Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. New York: Routledge.
  38. Terpstra, T. (2011). Emotions, trust, and perceived risk: affective and cognitive routes to flood preparedness behavior. Risk Analysis, 31(10), 1658–1675.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01616.x21477090
  39. Wachinger, G., Renn, O., Begg, C., & Kuhlicke, C. (2013). The risk perception paradox - implications for governance and communication of natural hazards. Risk Analysis, 33(6):1049–1065.10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01942.x23278120
  40. Wahlberg, A.F., & Sjoberg, L. (2000) Risk perception and the media. Journal of Risk Research, 3 (1), 31–50. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870037669910.1080/136698700376699
  41. Walaski, P.F. (2011). Risk and crisis communications. Methods and messages. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.10.1002/9781118093429
  42. Wilde, G.J.S. (1998). Risk Homeostasis theory. An overview. Injury Prevention, 4, 89–91.10.1136/ip.4.2.8917303489666358
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/gssfj-2018-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2587-3326 | Journal ISSN: 2587-3318
Language: English
Page range: 128 - 151
Published on: Dec 14, 2018
Published by: DISFOR University of Genova, International Institute of Management IMI-Nova and Fondazione Sicurezza e libertà
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2018 Fabrizio Bracco, Cinzia Modafferi, Luca Ferraris, published by DISFOR University of Genova, International Institute of Management IMI-Nova and Fondazione Sicurezza e libertà
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.