Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Microbial pre-conditioning of perchlorate-bearing Martian regolith simulant: Geochemical evolution toward a plant-compatible substrate Cover

Microbial pre-conditioning of perchlorate-bearing Martian regolith simulant: Geochemical evolution toward a plant-compatible substrate

Open Access
|Sep 2026

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Conceptual workflow of the Plant Trek two-stage regolith-to-soil framework for Martian crop production. Stage I focuses on microbial perchlorate reduction and initial geochemical conditioning of PTMM, followed by a structure-building transition into Stage II, where plant growth, substrate evolution, and agricultural performance are integrated into a closed-loop regolith biomanufacturing system.

Figure 2.

Discrete water-extractable perchlorate measurements in PTMM during Stage I treatment from Day 0 to Day 72. (A) Absolute perchlorate concentrations in the sterile PTMM + perchlorate Day 0 proxy, non-microwaved and microwaved PTMM controls, and aerobic and anaerobic treatment samples. (B) Perchlorate remaining relative to the Day 0 proxy.

Table 1.

Replicate total carbon and nitrogen concentrations (wt.%) measured in anaerobic and aerobic PTMM treatments following Stage I microbial conditioning and Stage II plant growth.

StageVariableAnaerobic mean ± SDAerobic mean ± SDWelch's tp-valueq-valueFDR significant?
Stage Iwt.% N0.00575 ± 0.004580.00965 ± 0.000901.8690.12980.2596No
Stage Iwt.% C0.54547 ± 0.033150.56941 ± 0.022701.3330.22400.2987No
Stage IIwt.% N0.00501 ± 0.003440.01068 ± 0.001683.3170.01690.0676No
Stage IIwt.% C0.55525 ± 0.032020.56191 ± 0.010570.4410.67800.6780No
Figure 3.

pH of PTMM following Stage I microbial conditioning and after Stage II plant growth under anaerobic and aerobic treatments. Large markers indicate means ± SD, smaller markers represent individual replicates, and both treatments show a modest decline in pH during early soil development.

Figure 4.

Stage I bulk and NH4OAc-extractable elemental concentrations in PTMM following microbial conditioning: (a) anaerobic beneficial elements, (b) aerobic beneficial elements, (c) anaerobic non-desirable elements, and (d) aerobic non-desirable elements. Points show mean concentrations of ten replicate samples per treatment (n = 10), and error bars represent standard deviation where visible. Circles represent bulk concentrations, and squares represent exchangeable concentrations. Dashed reference lines indicate literature-based terrestrial soil screening values used for contextual comparison with the exchangeable, operationally defined plant-available fraction rather than the bulk elemental inventory. Minimum agricultural soil-test sufficiency references are shown for beneficial nutrients, including P, K, Mg, Mn, Zn, and Cu from Horneck et al. (2019), Ca from Marx et al. (1999), and Fe from Flynn (2015). Maximum screening references are shown for non-desirable elements, including Na from Agriculture Victoria (2025), Ti from OECD (2016), Cr, Co, As, Cd, and Pb from CCME (2007), and Ni from CCME (2015). These values are used as screening references and are not crop-specific thresholds.

Table 1a.

Bulk elemental concentrations.

ElementAnaerobic BulkAerobic BulkWelch p-valueFDR q-valueSignificant after FDR?
Na11,703.4 ± 597.4612,219.5 ± 1,188.370.2240.553No
Mg66,592.6 ± 4,128.0465,053.2 ± 2,630.370.3460.692No
P1,191.6 ± 69.312,602.8 ± 112.811.69 × 10−152.71 × 10−14Yes
K5,629.3 ± 345.985,393.5 ± 221.830.08920.476No
Ca80,579.9 ± 3,774.8279,985.9 ± 4,297.500.7320.780No
Ti1,845.7 ± 89.481,819.9 ± 123.900.6030.743No
Cr564.7 ± 62.88555.3 ± 44.370.7040.780No
Mn672.9 ± 44.35661.9 ± 31.430.5290.743No
Fe59,438.7 ± 3,766.0357,549.7 ± 2,034.800.1850.553No
Co33.97 ± 2.3633.19 ± 1.590.4000.710No
Ni384.2 ± 20.24378.7 ± 19.890.5520.743No
Cu18.07 ± 1.5017.05 ± 1.250.1270.507No
Zn51.75 ± 3.8655.50 ± 19.850.5710.743No
As3.381 ± 0.3043.430 ± 0.4390.7820.782No
Cd0.0201 ± 0.01050.0202 ± 0.00028Not testedNot testedNot tested
Pb3.815 ± 0.2943.430 ± 0.2500.009410.0753No
Table 1b.

Exchangeable elemental concentrations.

ElementAnaerobic ExchangeableAerobic ExchangeableWelch p-valueFDR q-valueSignificant after FDR?
Na3,143.2 ± 462.25,054.2 ± 511.47.41 × 10−82.47 × 10−7Yes
Mg1,034.9 ± 61.6920.4 ± 50.92.50 × 10−44.99 × 10−4Yes
P3.31 ± 2.47222.16 ± 24.152.79 × 10−102.79 × 10−9Yes
K529.7 ± 44.5556.8 ± 37.30.1570.197No
Ca20,621.6 ± 1,433.221,705.2 ± 1,552.60.1220.175No
Ti0.00 ± 0.000.12 ± 0.062.02 × 10−44.99 × 10−4Yes
Cr0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00Not testedNot testedNot tested
Mn5.68 ± 0.715.77 ± 0.570.7580.758No
Fe39.75 ± 2.839.42 ± 3.50.5670.630No
Co0.06 ± 0.050.10 ± 0.000.03680.0613No
Ni0.55 ± 0.040.30 ± 0.011.30 × 10−96.49 × 10−9Yes
Cu0.30 ± 0.100.20 ± 0.10Not testedNot testedNot tested
Zn0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00Not testedNot testedNot tested
As0.00 ± 0.000.10 ± 0.10Not testedNot testedNot tested
Cd0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00Not testedNot testedNot tested
Pb0.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00Not testedNot testedNot tested
Language: English
Page range: 138 - 149
Published on: Sep 10, 2026
Published by: American Society for Gravitational and Space Research
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2026 Leon Kelly, Rafael Loureiro, Kayari Harris, Kennda Lynch, Anna Simpson, Daniel D. Richter, published by American Society for Gravitational and Space Research
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.