Table 1
| Author | Year of publication | Country of study | Study design | Sample size | Sample demographics Gender: Age Method of recruitment/sampling: | Type of instrument/method used | Title and findings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Choudhry et al. | 2013 | Pakistan | Focused group | 7 | Gender: 4 males 3 females Age: 24 to 42 years Method: Homogenous purposive sampling | Focused group followed by interpretative phenomenological analysis | “Perception of mental health in Pakistani nomads: an interpretative phenomenological analysis.” Four themes about perception of mental illness are derived:
|
| Choudhry et al. | 2018 | Pakistan | In depth interviews. | 12 | Gender: 5 males 7 females Age: 18 to 26 years Method of sampling: Snowball sampling | In depth interviews Interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) | “Mental health conceptualisation and resilience factors in Kalasha youth: An indigenous ethnic and religious minority community in Pakistan” Three superordinate themes were identified each with emergent themes. They are:
|
| Cinnirella et al. | 1999 | England | Open-ended interview | 54 | Gender: All females Method of sampling: Sampling procedure was a mix of quota, convenience and snowball techniques with all participants being female volunteers. Age: Not provided in paper | Open ended (in depth) interview followed by qualitative thematic analysis | “Religious and ethnic group influences on beliefs about mental illness: A qualitative interview study.”
|
| Croot et al. | 2008 | UK | In-depth interviews | 16 | Gender: 4 males 12 females Method of sampling: Purposive sampling Age: Not provided in paper, but all participants are parents whilst one was a grandparent | In-depth interviews followed by thematic analysis of data | “Perceptions of the causes of childhood disability among Pakistani families living in the UK. ”Following perceptions and causes of childhood disability among Pakistani families living in the UK were identified:
|
| Gunasinghe et al. | 2018 | UK | Semi-structured Interview | 6 | Gender: All females Method of sampling: Purposive sampling Age: 24 to 40 years | Six semi structured interviews followed by IPT | “Understanding how izzat impacts the lived experiences of young Muslim Pakistani women in the UK: A phenomenological approach ”How ‘Izzat’ impacts the lived experience of young Pakistani women living in the UK three themes are identified:
|
| Gilbert et al. | 2004 | UK | Focused groups | Not given | Gender: All females Method of sampling: Purposive sampling Age: Three groups done mean age in each is 20, 32 and 57 years old. | Three focused groups with different age groups, followed by thematic analysis | “A focus group exploration of the impact of izzat, shame, subordination and entrapment on mental health and service use in South Asian women living in Derby. ”The key themes to emerge were that
|
| Hussain et al. | 2017 | Pakistan | Questionnaire based data collection | 100 | Gender:45 males55 females Age: 18 to 65 years Method of sampling: Not described in paper | Four questionnaires; a socio-demographic questionnaire, the Illness Perception Questionnaire for Schizophrenia (IPQ-S), Drug attitude Inventory-10 (DAI) and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (PSS) completed by all participants | “Illness perceptions in patients of schizophrenia: A preliminary investigation from Lahore, Pakistan.”
|
| Imran et al. | 2015 | Pakistan | Questionnaire based data collection | 52 | Gender: 67% females and 33% males Age: Mean age 12.7 years (Range 11 to 18 years) Method of sampling: Not mentioned | Interviews using a structured questionnaire including the Illness Perceptions Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R). | “Illness perceptions in adolescents with a psychiatric diagnosis in Pakistan. ”Exploring the illness perceptions in adolescents with a psychiatric diagnosis in Pakistan revealed following:
|
| James et al. | 2002 | Pakistan and India | Two separate interviews three months apart | 948 | Gender: Male 12.7% standard care, 28.6% integrated care Female 87.3% standard care, 71.4% integrated care Age: 16 to 60 years Method of sampling: Purposive random selection |
| “Demand for, access to and use of community mental health care: lessons from a demonstration project in India and Pakistan. ”Following were noted:
|
| Mirza et al. | 2006 | Pakistan | Semi-structured questionnaire | 157 | Gender: Male n = 62 (mean age 36.56 years) Female n = 88 (mean age 39.25 years) Age: Mean 38.14 years (median 35, Mode 35) Method of recruitment: Purposive sampling | 1. A semi-structured questionnaire was devised and administered. 2. Later, participants were seen and diagnosed by a psychiatrist to confirm diagnosis of mental illness. | “Primary mental health care in rural Punjab, Pakistan: Providers, and user perspectives of the effectiveness of treatments.” Aim was to
Following types of health care providers were identified:
All were using a range of physical, spiritual and psychotherapeutic treatments. Of these, patients found GP treatments most effective. |
| Naeem et al. | 2007 | Pakistan | In depth interview | 9 | Gender: 3 males 6 females Age: 18 to 60 years Method of recruitment: Purposive Sampling | Interviews lasting between 30 and 60 minutes | “Views of depressed patients in Pakistan concerning their illness, its causes, and treatments.”
|
| Saeed et al. | 2000 | Pakistan | Screening at faith healers’ practice, followed by conducting GHQ-12 on all attenders | 144 | Gender: 192 (64%) females and 106 (36%) males Age: Not given Method of recruitment: Purposive sampling |
| “The prevalence, classification and treatment of mental disorders among attenders of native faith healers in rural Pakistan.”
|
| Shah et al. | 2018 | Pakistan | Some quantitative data followed by Cross sectional in-depth semi-structured interviews | 50 | Gender: 26 males 24 females Age: Mean age 36.2 years Method of recruitment: Purposive sampling | Perceived public stigma scale and an in-depth semi-structured interviews were used | “Impact of conventional beliefs and social stigma on attitude towards access to mental health services in Pakistan.”
|
| Sheikh et al. | 2000 | Pakistan and UK | Cross sectional questionnaire-based survey | 287 | Gender: Pakistani 30 males, 47 females Age: 18 to 60 years 2 participants 60 years plus, exact age of those two is not given Method of recruitment: Convenience sampling by approaching individuals on two locations and suggesting engagement | Two questionnaires: The orientations to seeking professional help and the mental distress explanatory model questionnaire and in addition a demographic data sheet. | “A cross cultural study of mental health beliefs and attitudes towards seeking professional help.”
|
| Suhail et al. | 2019 | Pakistan | Vignette based cross sectional survey | 1750 | Gender: 850 males 900 females Age: range 16 to 72 years, mean 34.03 years Method of recruitment: The sampling was quasi random. |
| “A study investigating mental health literacy in Pakistan.”
|
| Tabassum et al. | 2000 | UK | Interview as per interview schedule | 74 | Gender: 22 males 29 first generation females 23 second generation females Age: Median ages 47.6, 43.8 and 19.7 years, respectively Method of recruitment: Purposive sampling. | 60 to 90 minutes long interviews consisting of a schedule comprising of 21 statements | “Attitudes towards mental health in an urban Pakistani community in the United Kingdom.”
|
| Tareen et al. | 2008 | Pakistan | Two staged process: Screening through semi-structured questionnaire followed by consultation by psychiatrist of those that were screened positive | 98 | Gender:50 males 41 females Age: 10.93 years (SD 5.29) (male 11.10 vs. female 10.72) Method of recruitment: Purposive sampling |
| “Primary care treatment for child and adolescent neuropsychiatric conditions in remote rural Punjab, Pakistan – a cross-sectional survey.”
|
| Zafar et al. | 2009 | Pakistan | A structured questionnaire was employed | 985 | Gender: 536 males 449 females Age: average 36.7 years Method of recruitment: Nonprobability convenience sample of adults | A cross-sectional study. A structured questionnaire was employed to survey the knowledge and perceptions of adult general public about psychotherapy. | “Psychotherapy for treatment modality for psychiatric disorders: perceptions of general public of Karachi Pakistan.”
|
| Zafar et al. | 2008 | Pakistan | Cross section survey, self-administered questionnaire | 404 | Gender:77% males 33% females Age: Mean age 31.4 years Method of recruitment: Convenience sampling | Data was collected via a self-administered questionnaire. Questions were related to a vignette of a young man displaying schizophrenic behaviour | “Perceptions about the cause of Schizophrenia and subsequent help seeking behaviour in Pakistani population-results of cross-sectional survey.”
|
Table 2
All studies judged against the following appraisal criteria for identification and appreciation of possible bias
| Are following satisfied | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-Philosophical underpinnings clarified? That is, epistemological and ontological perspective | N | D | N | N | L | D | N | N | N | N | L | N | N | N | N | N | N | N | N |
| 2-Reasons provided for the choice of methodology and design? | L | D | L | L | D | D | N | N | N | N | D | L | L | A | L | L | N | N | N |
| 3-Credibility (Internal Validity) justified? For example, having outside auditors or participants validate findings (member checks), peer debriefing, attention to negative cases, independent analysis of data by more than one researcher, verbatim quotes, persistent observation | N | D | D | D | D | D | L | L | L | L | D | L | L | L | L | A | L | L | L |
| 4-Transferability (External validity or generalisability) justified? For example, providing details of the study participants to enable readers to evaluate for which target groups the study provides valuable information, providing contextual background information, demographics, the provision of thick description about both the sending and the receiving context and so on | L | D | D | A | A | D | L | L | L | L | D | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| 5-Dependability (Reliability or consistency) justified? Peer review, debriefing, audit trails, triangulation in the context of the use of different methodological approaches to look at the topic of research, reflexivity to keep a self-critical account of the research process, calculation of inter-rater agreements | N | D | D | A | A | D | N | L | L | N | D | L | L | L | L | L | L | L | L |
| 6-Confirmability (Objectivity or neutrality) justified? Assessing the effects of the researcher during all the steps of the research process, reflexivity, providing background information on the researcher's background, education, perspective, school of thought | L | D | D | D | L | D | L | L | L | N | D | A | L | D | L | N | N | N | N |
[i] N = None, L = Little, A = Adequate, D = Detailed
[ii] (Manual critical analysis by author)
[iii] None = No information provided at all
[iv] Little = Little information is provided though very superficial
[v] Adequate = Some discussion offered related to overall aim of the study
[vi] Detailed = Detailed description is offered