Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Human Agency and Environmental Crisis: The Autonomy of Politics between Hybridism and Dualism Cover

Human Agency and Environmental Crisis: The Autonomy of Politics between Hybridism and Dualism

By: André Murgia  
Open Access
|Jan 2025

References

  1. BECK, U. (2013). La società del rischio. Verso una seconda modernità. A cura di Walter Privitera. Rome: Carocci.
  2. BECK, U., and SZNAIDER, N. (2006). Unpacking Cosmopolitanism for the Social Sciences: A Research Agenda. The British Journal of Sociology, 57 (1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2006.00091.x.
  3. BRAUDEL, F. (2012). Espansione europea e capitalismo: 1450-1650. Bologna: Il mulino.
  4. CLIFFORD, J. (2013). Returns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. DeLANDA, M. (2016). Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474413640.
  6. Eames Office, reg. (2010). Powers of TenTM (1977). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fKBhvDjuy0.
  7. ESCOBAR, A. (2015). Territorios de diferencia: la ontología política de los “derechos al territorio”. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, fasc. 41: 25–38.
  8. FOSTER, J. B., BRETT, C., and RICHARD, Y. (2011). The ecological rift: Capitalism’s war on the earth. New York: New York University Press.
  9. GIDDENS, A. (1973). Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis Of The Writings Of Marx, Durkheim And Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  10. HARAWAY, D. (2015). Anthropocene, capitalocene, plantationocene, chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental humanities, 6 (1): 159–65.
  11. LATOUR, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.
  12. LATOUR, B. (2014). Agency at the Time of the Anthropocene. New literary history, 45 (1): 1–18.
  13. LEVIN, S. (1992). Pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology, 73: 1943–67.
  14. LOVELOCK, J. E. (1989). Geophysiology, the Science of Gaia. Reviews of Geophysics, 27 (2): 215–22. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG027i002p00215.
  15. MALM, A. (2019). Against hybridism: Why we need to distinguish between nature and society, now more than ever. Historical Materialism, 27 (2): 156–87.
  16. MOORE, J. W. (2016). Anthropocene or capitalocene?: Nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. New York: Pm Press.
  17. MORTON, T. (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  18. POLLINI, J. (2013). Bruno Latour and the ontological dissolution of nature in the social sciences: A critical review. Environmental Values, 22 (1): 25–42.
  19. SASSEN, S. (2001). The Global City: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  20. SCHMITT, C. (2003). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Telos Press.
  21. SERRES, M. (1995). The Natural Contract. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  22. WHITESIDE, K. H. (2013). A representative politics of nature? Bruno Latour on collectives and constitutions. Contemporary Political Theory, 12: 185–205.
  23. WOODS, D. (2014). Scale Critique for the Anthropocene. The Minnesota Review, 2014 (83): 133–42. https://doi.org/10.1215/00265667-2782327.
Language: English, Portuguese
Page range: 53 - 64
Published on: Jan 9, 2025
Published by: Ludus Association
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2025 André Murgia, published by Ludus Association
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.