Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Accounting for Overcounting Induced by 222Rn Contamination in 14C Measurements Performed with Liquid Scintillation Counting Cover

Accounting for Overcounting Induced by 222Rn Contamination in 14C Measurements Performed with Liquid Scintillation Counting

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig 1.

Alpha and beta particle spectra of radioactive nuclides in a Quantulus 1220™ liquid scintillation counter with counting windows used at the Gliwice Laboratory (Poland). In most cases, peak from 210Pb would not be observed in radiocarbon dating due to its low probability.

Fig 2.

Counts spectra for the GdS-4657 sample with counting windows used at the Gliwice Laboratory.

Fig 3.

Exponential function fitted into (A) – radon and daughter products window, (B) – combined 14C and radon and daughter products window. Fitted functions are shown with a 68.3% confidence band.

Fig 4.

The results of the solved system of equations for the GdS-4657 sample. (A) – Equation corresponding to the radon and daughter products window. (B) – Equation corresponding to the combined 14C and radon and daughter products window. The fitted functions for both equations are shown with a 68.3% confidence band.

Fig 5.

Evolution of determined count rate, with a χ2 value versus χcrit2 \chi _{crit}^2 at α = 0.05. Each data point represents a hypothetical scenario where measurements were terminated after a specific cycle, starting from the 10th cycle for the first point, the 11th cycle for the second point, the 12th cycle for the third point, and so on. (A) – Subtraction approach. (B) – System of equations approach.

Subsequent decays of the uranium series from 226Ra to 210Pb_

Parent isotopeDecay modeDaughter isotopePercentage of decay mode (%)Half-life T1/2Weighted mean β decay energy, keVQ value (max energy), keVMajor decay branches (>0.5%)

Mean βenergy, keVEnd-point energy, keVBranching percentages (%)
14Cβ14N1005700(30) year49.47(10)156.475(4)49.47(10)156.475(4)100
226Raα222Rn1001600(7) year4870.62(25)4601(1)6.16(3)
4784.34(25)93.84(11)
222Rnα218Po1003.8222(9) day5590.4(3)5489.48(30)99.920(10)
218Poα214Pb99.980(2)3.097(12) min6114.75(9)6002.55(10)99.9789(20)
218Poβ218At0.020(2)3.097(12) min259(12)
218Atα214Bi99.95(5)1.27(6) s6876.1(26)6654(5)6.90(10)
6693(3)92.7(5)
218Atβ218Rn0.05(5)1.27(6) s2883(12)
218Rnα214Po10033.75(15) ms7262.5(19)7129.1(19)99.870(4)
214Pbβ214Bi10027.06(7) min224(5)1018(11)48.0(32)179(11)2.75(8)
142.8(37)484(11)1.063(18)
205.1(39)666(11)44.5(7)
225.3(40)723(11)39.0(5)
334.5(42)1018(11)12.7(9)

214Biβ214Po99.9790(13)19.71(2) min641(6)3269(11)161.4(38)540(11)0.542(22)
247.8(40)787(11)1.28(4)
260.5(41)821(11)2.78(6)
317.8(42)976(11)0.563(16)
351.8(42)1065(11)5.56(5)
356.1(43)1076(11)0.866(12)
384.7(43)1150(11)4.33(4)
424.2(44)1252(11)2.459(15)
426.7(44)1258(11)1.433(11)
433.1(44)1274(11)1.192(21)
474.5(44)1379(11)1.589(17)
491.6(44)1422(11)8.16(5)
524.9(43)1504(11)16.90(11)
539.0(45)1539(11)17.55(10)
566.8(45)1608(11)0.57(5)
614.9(46)1726(11)3.09(4)
667.6(46)1854(11)0.90(5)
683.3(46)1891(11)7.22(8)
1007.1(47)2660(11)0.55(8)
1268.4(48)3269(11)19.2(4)
214Biα210Tl0.0210(13)19.9(4) min5621(3)5273(9)5.8(5) a
5452(3)54(4) a
5516(3)39(3) a
214Poα210Pb100163.6(3) µs7833.46(6)7686.82(7)99.9895(6)
210Tlβ210Pb1001.30(3) min1.18(16)∙1035482(12)477(13)1380(30)2.0(10)
568(14)1600(30)7.0(20)
674(10)1860(24)24(5)
743(11)2020(30)10(3)
877.1(69)2413(17)10(3)
1635(18)4210(40)30(6)
1762.6(54)4386(12)20.0(20)

210Pbβ210Bi10022.20(22) year6.1(6)63.5(5)4.16(13)17.0(5)84(3)
16.16(13)63.5(5)16(3)
210Pbα206Hg1.9(3)∙10−622.20(22) year3792(20)3720(20)

The measurement results for sample without correction, with both methods of exponential corrections, and after aging process_

Sample ID as+bC,min-1g-1 {\boldsymbol {a}}_{\boldsymbol {s + b}}^\boldsymbol {C}\boldsymbol {,}\,{{\bf{min}}^{{\bf{ - 1}}}}\,{\bf{ \cdot }}\,{{\bf{g}}^{{\bf{ - 1}}}} SQP(E)F14CRadiocarbon age, 14C year
GdS-46576.420(18)806.35(30)0.8318(45)1480(43)
Immediate, without correction
GdS-46576.272(55)806.35(30)0.8120(79)1673(78)
Exponential correction
Subtraction approach
GdS-46576.275(24)806.35(30)0.8124(48)1669(48)
Exponential correction
System of equations approach
GdS-46846.345(31)809.89(44)0.8115(54)1678(53)
After aging process
Language: English
Page range: 91 - 99
Submitted on: Jun 25, 2023
|
Accepted on: Nov 3, 2023
|
Published on: Dec 15, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2023 Maksymilian Jędrzejowski, Danuta J. Michczyńska, Adam Michczyński, Marzena Kłusek, Konrad Tudyka, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.