Fig 1

Fig 2

Fig 3

Fig 4

Fig 5

Fig 6

Fig 7

Szeged a-source dose rates determined by different calibration procedures_
| Sample | Procedure | Calculation | Dose rate (Gy/s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quartz (OSZ 1107) | MAR OSL | OSLBAY → DαSZE(s) | 0.071 ± 0.002 |
| Polymineral (OSZ 1614) | MAR IR50 |
| 0.109 ± 0.012 |
| MAR pIRIR290 |
| 0.085 ± 0.010 | |
| Quartz (OSZ 1107) | α-SAR OSL |
| 0.076 ± 0.004 |
| α-dose recovery | |||
| RISØ quartz (Batch 108) | α-SAR OSL |
| 0.086 ± 0.005 |
| γ-dose recovery |
Environmental dose rates for the quartz and polymineral fraction of the same loess sample, calculated by applying the lowest and highest a-source dose rate received during the cross-calibration process_
| 226Ra (Bq/kg) | 232Th (Bq/kg) | 40K (Bq/kg) | w (%) | Depth (m) | Mineral | D*α-source (Gy/s) | a-value | D*α (Gy/ka) | D*tot (Gy/ka) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34.7 ± 0.4 | 34.2 ± 0.6 | 390.9 ± 15.1 | 10 ± 2 | 0.9 | Q | 0.071 ± 0.002 | 0.041 ± 0.003 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 2.89 ± 0.07 |
| 0.086 ± 0.005 | 0.034 ± 0.003 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 2.83 ± 0.07 | ||||||
| PM | 0.071 ± 0.002 | 0.077 ± 0.003 | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 3.27 ± 0.09 | |||||
| 0.086 ± 0.005 | 0.063 ± 0.004 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 3.15 ± 0.08 |