Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Residual Dose of K-Feldspar post-IR Irsl of Beach-Shoreface Sands at Kujukuri, Eastern Japan Cover

Residual Dose of K-Feldspar post-IR Irsl of Beach-Shoreface Sands at Kujukuri, Eastern Japan

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

A) Location map of the study area and plate boundaries between the Eurasian (EUR), Okhotsk (OKH), Philippine Sea (PHS), and Pacific Ocean (PAC) plates. B) Morpho-sedimentary map of the Kujukuri beach-ridge plain and offshore showing the locations of modern samples and drill cores (modified from Tamura et al., 2008b). Five modern samples (Katakai, BS9, 10, 23, and 34) and two drill cores (GS-QYH-1 and GS-QAS-2) were used for the analysis. The red line shows the location of the cross section in Fig. 2. The definition of beach-ridge groups I–III is after Moriwaki (1979) and their formative durations were determined based on radiocarbon chronology in a cross section near the Makame and Sakuta rivers (Masuda et al., 2001b; Tamura et al., 2007).

Fig. 2

Cross section across the Kujukuri beach-ridge plain and offshore area (see location in Fig. 1b). The positions of the two drill cores and five modern sediment samples analyzed herein were projected onto a single section. Six samples were taken for analysis from each drill core. Radiocarbon dates of molluscan shells and a plant fragment are shown beside the columns of the cores. Dashed lines indicate the isochrones of the beach-ridge group boundary. The stratigraphic outline was defined on the basis of drill cores and compilations of previous studies in the central part of the plain (e.g., Tamura et al., 2003, 2007, 2008a, 2008b). FS: foreshore and backshore facies; US: upper shoreface facies; LS: lower shoreface facies; T.P.: Tokyo Peil, the standard datum for elevation measurements in Japan.

Fig. 3

Fading-corrected final luminescence age estimates of samples taken from (A) core GS-QAS-2 and (B) core GS-QYH-1. Radiocarbon ages of molluscan shells are also shown for comparison. Radiocarbon ages at the ground surface were assumed to be 5.7 ka and 0 ka for cores GS-QAS-2 and GS-QYH-1, respectively, to define the expected ages (red lines).

Fig. 4

Decay curves and dose–response curves (inset) of IR50, pIRIR150, and pIRIR290 measured on samples (A) gsj15259 and (B) gsj17282. The intersections of the natural OSL intensity with the dose–response curve and the corresponding equivalent dose are highlighted with red dashed lines.

Fig. 5

Fading test results of IR50, pIRIR150, and pIRIR290 signals measured for sample gsj15258. A regression line was defined for each signal based on the least-squares method and then applied to estimate the g-value.

Fig. 6

Plots of fading-corrected De derived from (A) IR50, (B) pIRIR150, and (C) pIRIR290 against expected De. The y-intercept of the regression line for pIRIR290 represents the average residual dose, which is estimated as 24.2 Gy. Dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence interval.

Fig. 7

Plots of residual dose estimated for pIRIR290 against depositional water depth of the sample. The regression line exhibits only a very weak correlation; however, a few samples taken from less than 5 m water depth exhibit slightly lower residual doses than others. Dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence interval.

Details of modern samples_ Equivalent doses (De) were determined from IR50, pIRIR150, and pIRIR290_

SiteLab codeLatitudeLongitudeWater depth (m)De from IR50 (Gy)De from pIRIR150 (Gy)De from pIRIR290 (Gy)
Katakaigsj15160N35°32′28.2″E140°27′55.8″00.09 ± 0.010.93 ± 0.0811.93 ± 1.66
BS9gsj17282N35°37′42.1″E140°37′13.9″130.04 ± 0.011.80 ± 0.1627.28 ± 1.08
BS10gsj17283N35°37′42.3″E140°40′16.6″140.07 ± 0.0032.45 ± 0.1329.09 ± 1.44
BS23gsj17284N35°35′11.9″E140°41′48.5″230.18 ± 0.013.25 ± 0.3329.27 ± 1.47
BS34gsj17273N35°32′40.0″E140°45′39.4″340.06 ± 0.012.26 ± 0.1423.92 ± 1.60

Details of Holocene samples taken from drill cores: sample level, water, U, Th, K, and Rb contents, estimated dose rates, and expected ages from radiocarbon dates_ The internal dose rate was estimated to be 0_738±0_123 Gy/ka for all samples_

Lab codeDepth (m)Water content (%)U (ppm)Th (ppm)K (%)Rb (ppm)Cosmic dose rate (Gy/ka)Total dose rate (Gy/ka)Expected age (ka)
GSJ-QAS2 (N35°43′17.3″ E140°37′52.0″ Elevation: +5.2 m)
gsj151492.2210.672.91.1390.15 ± 0.022.07 ± 0.145.89 ± 0.08
gsj151514.2310.893.61.3480.12 ± 0.012.17 ± 0.146.01 ± 0.08
gsj151547.5200.73.01.4550.09 ± 0.012.28 ± 0.146.26 ± 0.08
gsj1515510.2391.14.31.6620.07 ± 0.012.26 ± 0.146.88 ± 0.08
gsj1515714.4340.893.81.6600.05 ± 0.012.28 ± 0.147.13 ± 0.08
gsj1515814.8421.23.81.6620.05 ± 0.002.21 ± 0.147.15 ± 0.08
GSJ-QYH1 (N35°37′00.0″ E140°32′29.2″ Elevation: +2.1 m)
gsj152542.3200.914.80.97340.15 ± 0.022.13 ± 0.140.23 ± 0.08
gsj152554.9330.883.11.6580.11 ± 0.012.30 ± 0.140.45 ± 0.08
gsj152567.2300.673.31.5520.09 ± 0.012.23 ± 0.140.66 ± 0.08
gsj1525710.7330.764.01.5500.06 ± 0.012.16 ± 0.141.13 ± 0.08
gsj1525814.6310.733.11.6500.05 ± 0.012.21 ± 0.141.74 ± 0.08
sj1525919.2310.83.51.6510.03 ± 0.002.24 ± 0.142.44 ± 0.08

Equivalent dose (De), uncorrected age, g-value, corrected age, offset from expected age, and De offset from expected for pIRIR150 signals of Holocene samples_

Lab codeDepth (m)De (Gy)Uncorrected age (ka)g-value (%/decade)Corrected age (ka)Age offset from expected (ka)De offset from expected (Gy)
GS-QAS-2
gsj151492.222.83 ± 1.2511.0 ± 0.91.13 ± 0.1712.0 ± 1.26.1 ± 1.212.64 ± 0.16
gsj151514.234.00 ± 1.5115.7 ± 1.21.28 ± 0.09*17.3 ± 1.311.3 ± 1.324.46 ± 0.18
gsj151547.528.50 ± 1.1712.5 ± 0.91.16 ± 0.0813.7 ± 1.07.4 ± 1.016.88 ± 0.15
gsj1515510.240.57 ± 1.1717.9 ± 1.21.28 ± 0.09*19.8 ± 1.312.9 ± 1.329.21 ± 0.18
gsj1515714.439.51 ± 1.3617.3 ± 1.21.28 ± 0.09*19.2 ± 1.312.0 ± 1.327.40 ± 0.19
gsj1515814.839.62 ± 1.0317.9 ± 1.21.28 ± 0.09*19.8 ± 1.312.7 ± 1.327.95 ± 0.18
GS-QYH-1
gsj152542.318.08 ± 0.608.5 ± 0.61.45 ± 0.379.4 ± 0.79.2 ± 0.719.58 ± 0.10
gsj152554.926.42 ± 1.3811.5 ± 0.91.11 ± 0.1612.5 ± 0.912.0 ± 0.927.69 ± 0.12
gsj152567.221.50 ± 0.859.6 ± 0.71.05 ± 0.3210.4 ± 0.79.8 ± 0.721.78 ± 0.10
gsj1525710.728.89 ± 0.7913.4 ± 0.91.07 ± 0.1214.5 ± 1.013.3 ± 1.028.85 ± 0.14
gsj1525814.626.99 ± 1.0212.2 ± 0.91.96 ± 0.3614.3 ± 1.212.6 ± 1.227.81 ± 0.17
gsj1525919.225.46 ± 0.6411.4 ± 0.81.31 ± 0.1812.5 ± 0.910.1 ± 0.922.66 ± 0.13

Radiocarbon dating results for drill core samples_

Access codeCore depth (m)SampleConventional 14C age (yr BP)Calibrated age (2s) (cal yr BP)Probability
GS-QAS-2
IAAA-1535517.3Shell (Mactra chinensis)5720 ± 306019–62391.000
IAAA-1532829.1Shell (M. chinensis)6290 ± 306653–68431.000
IAAA-15355221.3Shell (Raetellops pulchellus)6970 ± 307411–75401.000
IAAA-15328325.4Shell (R. pulchellus)7850 ± 308224–83881.000
IAAA-15328438.9Shell (Glossaulax didyma)8950 ± 309511–97081.000
IAAA-15355341.8Shell (Dosinia angulosa)9570 ± 4010295–105511.000
IAAA-15146143.6Plant fragment9700 ± 4010878–109330.097
11080–112120.903
GS-QYH-1
IAAA-1535603.4Shell (Chion semigranosa)620 ± 20146–1640.026
187–3120.974
IAAA-1532888.4Shell (M. chinensis)1150 ± 20649–7491.000
IAAA-15356119.1Shell (Siliqua pulchella)2680 ± 302303–24561.000
IAAA-15328925.8Shell (R. pulchellus)7220 ± 307596–77611.000
IAAA-15356227.3Shell (Macoma tokyoensis)8020 ± 308393–85561.000
IAAA-15329032.4Shell (Dentalium octangulatum)9010 ± 409540–98221.000

Summaries of the IR50, pIRIR150, and pIRIR290 single-aliquot regenerative dose protocols used in this study_

Steppost-IR IRSL (150°C)Signalpost-IR IRSL (290°C)Signal
1Preheat at 180°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s
2IR stimulation at 50°C for 100 sLx for IRSL50IR stimulation at 50°C for 200 s
3IR stimulation at 150°C for 100 sLx for post-IR IRSL150IR stimulation at 290°C for 200 sLx for post-IR IRSL290
4Test dose Test dose
5Preheat at 180°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s
6IR stimulation at 50°C for 100 sTx for IRSL50IR stimulation at 50°C for 200 s
7IR stimulation at 150°C for 100 sTx for post-IR IRSL150IR stimulation at 290°C for 200 sTx for post-IR IRSL290
8Dose and return to step 1 IR stimulation at 325°C for 200 s
9 Dose and return to step 1

Equivalent dose (De), uncorrected age, g-value, corrected age, offset from expected age, and De offset from expected for IR50 signals of Holocene samples_

Lab codeDepth (m)De (Gy)Uncorrected age (ka)g-value (%/decade)Corrected age (ka)Age offset from expected (ka)De offset from expected (Gy)
GS-QAS-2
gsj151492.25.25 ± 0.092.5 ± 0.28.48 ± 0.735.8 ± 1.0−0.1 ± 1.0−0.17 ± 0.14
gsj151514.26.78 ± 0.113.1 ± 0.27.96 ± 0.15*6.8 ± 0.50.8 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.07
gsj151547.57.64 ± 0.203.4 ± 0.27.51 ± 0.456.9 ± 0.80.6 ± 0.81.5 ± 0.11
gsj1515510.27.89 ± 0.133.5 ± 0.27.96 ± 0.15*7.6 ± 0.50.7 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.07
gsj1515714.48.10 ± 0.093.6 ± 0.27.96 ± 0.15*7.8 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.61.5 ± 0.09
gsj1515814.87.82 ± 0.113.5 ± 0.27.96 ± 0.15*7.7 ± 0.60.6 ± 0.61.3 ± 0.08
GS-QYH-1
gsj152542.30.28 ± 0.010.13 ± 0.018.21 ± 0.420.2 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.10.01 ± 0.01
gsj152554.90.40 ± 0.010.18 ± 0.018.26 ± 0.280.3 ± 0.0−0.1 ± 0.1−0.29 ± 0.01
gsj152567.20.67 ± 0.020.30 ± 0.027.39 ± 0.100.5 ± 0.0−0.1 ± 0.1−0.27 ± 0.01
gsj1525710.71.46 ± 0.030.68 ± 0.058.93 ± 0.901.5 ± 0.30.4 ± 0.30.77 ± 0.04
gsj1525814.61.95 ± 0.020.88 ± 0.067.20 ± 0.131.6 ± 0.1−0.1 ± 0.1−0.26 ± 0.02
gsj1525919.22.49 ± 0.031.1 ± 0.17.73 ± 0.732.2 ± 0.3−0.3 ± 0.3−0.57 ± 0.05
Language: English
Page range: 364 - 378
Submitted on: Feb 15, 2019
|
Accepted on: Mar 13, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 Toru Tamura, Junko Komatsubara, Saiko Sugisaki, Naohisa Nishida, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.