Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Age of sediments on Danube terraces of the Pest Plain (Hungary) based on optically stimulated luminescence dating of quartz and feldspar Cover

Age of sediments on Danube terraces of the Pest Plain (Hungary) based on optically stimulated luminescence dating of quartz and feldspar

Open Access
|Dec 2020

Figures & Tables

Fig 1

Location of the study area and geological surroundings after Horváth and Cloething (1996). P: Pest Plain, G: Gerecse Hills, S: Süttő, K: Katymár, Pa:Paks.

Fig 2

Pest Plain and the surrounding areas with the locations of the sampling sites and the terraces of the Danube. Terraces are based on Pécsi et al. (2000), Sz: Szentendre Island, K: Kisoroszi, V: Vác, Dv: Dunavarsány.

Fig 3

Traditional terrace system on the Pest Plain and in the surrounding areas after Pécsi (1959).

Table 1

Location and main characteristics of the samples.

LocationTerrace levelLatitude (N)Longitude (E)Altitude (m asL)SampleNr.Depth (cm)SedimentFacies
Nagytarcsa gravel mineV47.5282219.25767170.52Nt1
Nt2
120.1.
120.2.
700
790
medium sand with gravel
medium sand with gravel
fluvial
fluvial
Mogyoród gravel mineV47.5859419.22269247.66Mgy1
Mgy2
119.1.
119.2.
130
240
fine sand
fine sand
dune
dune
Csomád sand mine E wallIII47.6719419.18694146.49Csm1
Csm2
122.1.
122.2.
160
320
silty fine sand
silty fine sand
dune
dune
Csomád sand mine W wallIII47.6713119.18592150.81Csm3
Csm4
122.3.
122.4.
240
440
fine-medium sand
fine-medium sand
fluvial
fluvial?
Fót sand mineIII47.6451119.17714175Ft1
Ft2
123.1.
123.2.
180
350
fine-medium sand
fine-medium sand
slope, reworked fluvial
slope, reworked fluvial
Dk1121.1.190medium sanddune
Dk2121.2.360medium sanddune
Dunakeszi sand mineIIb47.6608319.15706165.47Dk3121.3.410medium sandfluvial
Dk4121.4.590fine sandfluvial
Dk5121.5.740fine-medium sandfluvial
Fig 4

Position of the samples in the sampling sites. A: Mogyoród gravel mine (aeolian sand), B: Dunakeszi sand mine (fluvial and aeolian sand), C-D: Fót sand mine (slope, reworked fluvial sand), E: Nagytarcsa gravel mine (fluvial sand), F: Csomád sand mine East wall (aeolian sand), G-H: Csomád sand mine West wall (fluvial sand).

Table 2

Dose rate determination.

SampleDepth (cm)U (ppm)Th (ppm)K (%)Water content (dryw%)Dose rate (Gy/ka)
QuartzK-feldspar
Nt17000.81 ± 0.022.49 ± 0.041.02 ± 0.0118 ± 31.22 ± 0.091.85 ± 0.19
Nt27900.75 ± 0.022.74 ± 0.031.04 ± 0.0118 ± 31.23 ± 0.091.86 ± 0.19
Mgy11301.72 ± 0.026.06 ± 0.050.79 ± 0.045 ± 11.69 ± 0.122.44 ± 0.17
Mgy22402.00 ± 0.047.25 ± 0.060.83 ± 0.035 ± 11.85 ± 0.132.63 ± 0.19
Csm11601.45 ± 0.024.15 ± 0.051.18 ± 0.045 ± 11.87 ± 0.132.57 ± 0.19
Csm23202.17 ± 0.057.20 ± 0.061.12 ± 0.055 ± 12.14 ± 0.162.93 ± 0.21
Csm32401.59 ± 0.025.01 ± 0.040.91 ± 0.0414 ± 31.54 ± 0.112.25 ± 0.16
Csm44401.53 ± 0.034.82 ± 0.040.90 ± 0.0314 ± 31.48 ± 0.102.18 ± 0.15
Ft11801.95 ± 0.053.81 ± 0.040.80 ± 0.0211 ± 21.50 ± 0.102.22 ± 0.15
Ft23501.95 ± 0.063.17 ± 0.030.83 ± 0.0311 ± 21.46 ± 0.102.16 ± 0.15
Dk11900.78 ± 0.011.95 ± 0.030.82 ± 0.035 ± 11.24 ± 0.091.86 ± 0.13
Dk23601.22 ± 0.023.85 ± 0.040.81 ± 0.035 ± 11.42 ± 0.102.10 ± 0.15
Dk34101.19 ± 0.033.10 ± 0.030.81 ± 0.0311 ± 21.28 ± 0.091.93 ± 0.14
Dk45901.42 ± 0.023.79 ± 0.040.89 ± 0.0411 ± 21.41 ± 0.102.09 ± 0.15
Dk57401.34 ± 0.034.18 ± 0.040.87 ± 0.0411 ± 21.39 ± 0.102.07 ± 0.15
Fig 5

Representative examples for visualisation of the characteristics and distributions of the equivalent doses in abanico plots. A and C: De-s were measured by SAR-OSL protocol on medium (5 mm) aliquots of quartz, B and D: De-s were determined with post-IR IRSL290 protocol on small (2 mm) aliquots of K-feldspar. (Abanico plot: http://rlum.geographie.uni-koeln.de:9418/packages/RLumShiny/inst/shiny/abanico/).

Table 3

Dose recovery ratios.

SampleDose recovery ratio
Quartz OSLK-feldspar post-IR IRSL290
Mgy11.01 ± 0.101.02 ± 0.09
Mgy21.03 ± 0.021.00 ± 0.10
Csm10.98 ± 0.071.01 ± 0.08
Csm20.96 ± 0.091.02 ± 0.05
Csm30.99 ± 0.081.08 ± 0.05
Csm41.01 ± 0.061.10 ± 0.04
Ft10.99 ± 0.071.08 ± 0.01
Ft20.97 ± 0.051.02 ± 0.07
Dk10.99 ± 0.020.97 ± 0.11
Dk21.03 ± 0.040.97 ± 0.15
Dk30.98 ± 0.070.98 ± 0.13
Dk40.98 ± 0.050.99 ± 0.09
Dk51.02 ± 0.060.96 ± 0.14
Table 4

Dating result of quartz and K-feldspar

Quartz OSLK-feldspar post-IR I2SL29OK. -feldspar age/Quartz age
SampleDepth (cm)nDe mean (Gy)OD (%)Age (ka)nDe mean (Gy)OD (%)Residual dose (Gy)Residual dose (%)**Age (ka)
w.s.w.s.a.no subtr.w. subtr.s. subtr.no subtr.w. subtr.s. subtr.
Nt17003546*>296
Nt27903537*>289
Mgy11302462.9 ± 2.718 ±337.1 ±3.110100.3 ±3.19± 214.6 ±0.614.69.541.0 ± 2.335.0± 2.11.10±0.110.94 ±0.10
Mgy22402570.4 ± 3.722 ±338.1 ±3.3999.7 ± 2.97 ± 219.2 ±3.07.4 ± 1.319.27.40.037.9 ± 1.930.6 ± 1.735.1 ± 1.80.99 ±0.100.80 ±0.080.92 ±0.09
Csm11602473.3 ±3.320 ±339.3 ±3.410115.4 ±3.17 ± 218.7 ±4.17.4 ±0.516.26.412.644.9 ± 2.337.7 ± 2.042.0 ± 2.21.14±0.110.96 ±0.101.07 ±0.11
Csm23202391.0 ±3.618 ±342.6 ±3.611126.2 ±4.811±316.3 ±3.913.01.043.1 ± 2.437.5 ± 2.21.01 ±0.100.88 ±0.09
Csm32402543.9 ± 2.929 ±428.5 ± 2.8969.6 ± 1.76± 213.4±3.619.27.930.9 ± 1.825.0 ± 1.51.09 ±0.120.88 ±0.10
Csm44402445.7 ± 2.321±330.9 ± 2.61176.5 ± 2.28± 213.3 ± 2.517.412.035.2 ± 2.129.0 ± 1.81.14 ±0.120.94 ±0.10
Ft11802722.8 ±0.918 ±315.1 ± 1.21135.0 ±0.97 ± 27.8 ±0.23.6 ±0.422.210.24.315.8 ±0.912.3 ±0.714.2 ±0.81.05 ±0.100.81 ±0.080.94 ±0.09
Ft23502533.3 ±0.912 ± 222.8 ± 1.81152.5 ± 1.59± 211.5 ±3.521.96.324.3 ± 1.419.0 ± 1.21.07 ±0.100.83 ±0.08
Dk11902416.8 ±0.721±313.6 ± 1.21233.2 ±0.65± 17.4 ± 1.022.323.917.9 ± 1.113.9 ±0.91.31 ±0.141.02 ±0.11
Dk23602520.0 ± 1.022±414.1 ± 1.21135.7 ±0.54± 110.0 ±0.93.9 ±0.228.110.817.117.0 ±0.912.2 ±0.715.2 ±0.81.21 ±0.120.87 ±0.091.08 ±0.11
Dk34102619.4 ± 1.230±415.2 ± 1.51135.7 ±0.97 ± 29.2 ±0.225.917.718.5 ± 1.113.7 ±0.91.22 ±0.140.90 ±0.10
Dk45905621.2 ±0.722 ± 215.0 ± 1.21239.3 ± 1.07 ± 29.0 ± 2.222.919.918.8 ± 1.114.5 ±0.91.25 ±0.130.96 ±0.10
Dk57402921.9 ±0.817 ±315.8 ± 1.31039.8 ±0.74± 110.6 ±0.326.717.819.2 ± 1.114.1 ±0.81.22 ±0.120.89 ±0.09

[i] n: number of aliquots; OD: overdispersion; *: 2xD0; **: residual dose in % of the measured natural dose;

w: residual dose after 12 h exposure to changeable sunshine in winter;

s: residual dose after 4 h exposure to bright sunlight in summer;

a: assumable residual based on the correlation with quartz ages;

no subtr.: feldspar age without subtraction of residual dose;

w. subtr.: feldspar age with subtraction of residual dose after 12 h exposure to changeable sunshine in winter;

s. subtr: feldspar age with subtraction of residual dose after 4 h exposure to bright sunlight in summer.

Fig 6

Change of post-IR IRSL290 residual doses of four K-feldspar separates due to exposure to bright sunlight in summer. (The measured average natural doses are 100 Gy in Mgy2, 115 Gy in Csm1, 35 Gy in Ft1 and 36 Gy in Dk2.)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/geochr-2020-0021 | Journal eISSN: 1897-1695 | Journal ISSN: 1733-8387
Language: English
Page range: 171 - 186
Submitted on: Sep 15, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 28, 2020
Published on: Dec 31, 2020
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Edit Thamó-Bozsó, Gábor Csillag, Judit Füri, Attila Nagy, Árpád Magyari, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.