Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Bleaching of Different K-Feldspar pIRIR Signals of Source Materials of Lacustrine Sediment – A Case Study from Bosten Lake Basin in Arid Central Asia Cover

The Bleaching of Different K-Feldspar pIRIR Signals of Source Materials of Lacustrine Sediment – A Case Study from Bosten Lake Basin in Arid Central Asia

Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

a) location map indicating position of Bosten Lake located on the southeastern side of the Yanqi basin on the southern slope of the Tian Shan Mountain; b) indicates the distribution of different modern depositional environments around the Bosten Lake Basin which were sampled. Four eolian sand samples (BST16S-1, BST16S-2, BST16S-3, and BST16S-14) were collected from the widespread sand dune field around the lake. Six samples BST16S-4, BST16S-5, BST16S-6, BST16S-7, BST16S-8 and BST16S-9 were collected from the over flooding deposit at different points of Kaidu River channel. Three samples BST16S-10, BST16S-11 and BST16S-12 were collected from the surface of the pluvial fan down the Elbin-Alagou Mountains. The red cycle with BST12B besides is the location of drill core BST12B from Li et al. (2016).

Fig. 2

Locations of modern analogue samples collected from different potential sources of lake sediment at Bosten Lake Basin.

Fig. 3

a) b) c) show the dose recovery test results from sample BST16S-1. a is the measured dose/given (M/G) dose; b) and c) show the recycling ratios and recuperation values.

Fig. 4

Luminescence characteristics of K-feldspar pIRIR signal for samples: a), b) and c) show representative decay and growth curves from the pIR50IR170, IR50, pIR50IR290, IR50 and pIR200IR290, IR200 signals for K-feldspar sample BST16S-5. d), e) and f) show the recycling ratios and recuperation values of all aliquots for the pIR50IR170, pIR50IR290 and pIR200IR290 De measurements for all samples, respectively.

Fig. 5

The distribution of De (a) and age (b) values obtained using different pIRIR signals (pIR50IR170 De, pIR50IR290 De and pIR200IR290).

Fig. 6

a) and b) pIRIR ages from eolian and river sediments plotted as a function of distance from sampling sites from Bosten Lake, respectively.

Fig. 7

Plots of the residual doses of eolian samples (a), fluvial samples (b) and pluvial samples (c) obtained using different pIRIR signals after 112 h sunlight bleaching as a function of the associated De values.

Fig. 8

a), b), c) and d) show the hard-to-bleach dose values for eolian, fluvial, and pluvial and lacustrine samples, respectively. pIR50IR170 residual dose of loess (red cycles) in a) and pIR50IR290 residual dose of lacustrine samples (square and triangle) in d) are cited from Li et al. (2015b) and Li et al. (2016), respectively.

Summary of the residual dose after 112 h bleaching under sunlight for all samples from Bosten lake Basin_

Sample No.Residual dose (112 h bleaching)
IR50 (Gy)pIR50IR170 (Gy)IR50 (Gy)pIR50IR290 (Gy)IR200 (Gy)pIR200IR290 (Gy)
BST16S-10.53 ± 0.010.10 ± 0.0050.34 ± 0.012.01 ± 0.050.76 ± 0.022.11 ± 0.08
BST16S-20.05 ± 0.0010.33 ± 0.010.32 ± 0.012.06 ± 0.050.75 ± 0.022.26 ± 0.09
BST16S-30.07 ± 0.0020.15 ± 0.0050.32 ± 0.011.80 ± 0.050.78 ± 0.022.48 ± 0.11
BST16S-40.08 ± 0.0021.02 ± 0.020.80 ± 0.024.74 ± 0.121.82 ± 0.046.01 ± 0.22
BST16S-50.06 ± 0.0020.62 ± 0.020.65 ± 0.023.43 ± 0.091.57 ± 0.045.00 ± 0.19
BST16S-60.39 ± 0.011.02 ± 0.021.00 ± 0.034.93 ± 0.131.99 ± 0.046.85 ± 0.27
BST16S-70.26 ± 0.011.10 ± 0.030.95 ± 0.026.00 ± 0.171.66 ± 0.045.48 ± 0.18
BST16S-80.30 ± 0.011.34 ± 0.030.89 ± 0.025.11 ± 0.142.25 ± 0.057.53 ± 0.28
BST16S-90.42 ± 0.011.58 ± 0.041.04 ± 0.035.19 ± 0.142.21 ± 0.057.21 ± 0.26
BST16S-100.50 ± 0.013.47 ± 0.081.57 ± 0.0410.69 ± 0.293.50 ± 0.0814.32 ± 0.51
BST16S-110.56 ± 0.013.91 ± 0.091.77 ± 0.0411.35 ± 0.293.82 ± 0.0815.94 ± 0.55
BST16S-120.89 ± 0.021.80 ± 0.040.81 ± 0.027.70 ± 0.203.06 ± 0.0710.24 ± 0.35
BST16S-141.14 ± 0.020.17 ± 0.010.33 ± 0.011.72 ± 0.050.80 ± 0.022.18 ± 0.09

The pIRIR dating protocol using: (i) the pIR50IR170 signal (Li et al_, 2015b); (ii) the pIR50IR290 signal (Thiel et al_, 2011); and (iii) the pIR200IR290 signal (Li and Li, 2012)_

SteppIR50IR170 dating protocolObservedpIR50IR290 dating protocolObservedpIR200IR290 dating protocolObserved
1Give dose Dia Give dose Dia Give dose Dia
2Preheat at 200°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s
3IRSL, 200 s at 50°CLx1IRSL, 200 s at 50°CLx1IRSL, 200 s at 200°CLx1
4pIRIR, 200 s at 170°CLx2pIRIR, 200 s at 290°CLx2pIRIR, 200 s at 290°CLx2
5Give test dose Give test dose Give test dose
6Preheat at 200°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s Preheat at 320°C for 60 s
7IRSL, 200 s at 50°CTx1IRSL, 200 s at 50°CTx1IRSL, 200 s at 200°CTx1
8pIRIR, 200 s at 170°CTx2pIRIR, 200 s at 290°CTx2pIRIR, 200 s at 290°CTx2
9 IRSL, 200s bleaching at 325°C IRSL, 200s bleaching at 325°C
10Return to 1 Return to 1 Return to 1

Summary of K-feldspar pIRIR age data for samples from Bosten lake Basin_

Sample No.pIR50IR170/pIR50IR290/pIR200IR290 AliquotIR50 De (Gy)pIR50IR170 De (Gy)IR50 De (Gy)pIR50IR290 De (Gy)IR200 De (Gy)pIR200IR290 De (Gy)pIR50IR170 OD (%)pIR50IR290 OD (%)pIR200IR290 OD (%)IR50 Age (ka)pIR50IR170 Age (ka)IR50 Age (ka)pIR50IR290 Age (ka)IR200 Age (ka)pIR200IR290 Age (ka)
BST16S-111/5/40.8±0.30.8±0.10.3±0.032.9±0.21.8±0.25.4±0.372±1511±49±40.2±0.10.2±0.030.1±0.010.9±0.10.6±0.11.7±0.1
BST16S-24/8/44.6±0.17.4±0.33.3±0.39.3±0.75.1±0.613.0±0.35±223±64±21.3±0.042.0±0.10.9±0.12.5±0.21.4±0.23.5±0.1
BST16S-34/5/40.6±0.041.3±0.10.9±0.14.8±0.41.8±0.16.4±0.29±315±53±20.2±0.010.4±0.030.3±0.031.4±0.10.5±0.031.8±0.1
BST16S-1411/5/40.2±0.10.4±0.10.4±0.13.0±0.21.0±0.024.0±0.253±1112±47±30.1±0.030.1±0.030.1±0.030.9±0.10.3±0.011.3±0.1
BST16S-44/4/40.8±0.13.5±0.33.1±0.519.2±1.76.5±0.231.0±1.016±616±64±20.2±0.030.9±0.10.8±0.15.0±0.51.7±0.18.1±0.4
BST16S-54/4/51.2±0.13.4±0.041.6±0.29.8±0.43.9±0.315.1±0.707±37±30.4±0.031.0±0.030.5±0.12.9±0.11.2±0.14.5±0.2
BST16S-64/4/61.8±0.15.9±0.23.2±0.318.2±1.67.5±0.430.7±1.85±216±610±40.5±0.031.6±0.10.9±0.14.9±0.52.0±0.18.3±0.6
BST16S-78/4/41.7±0.16.0±0.62.9±0.122.3±1.97.9±1.033.7±2.624±615±613±50.5±0.031.6±0.20.8±0.046.0±0.52.1±0.39.1±0.8
BST16S-88/7/82.7±0.96.8±0.82.9±0.320.5±1.68.9±1.140.2±3.532±822±619±50.7±0.21.8±0.20.8±0.15.4±0.52.4±0.310.7±1
BST16S-98/7/92.2±0.210.9±1.14.1±0.623.0±1.110.2±0.838.5±2.931±814±421±50.6±0.12.8±0.31.1±0.26.0±0.32.7±0.210±0.8
BST16S-108/5/489.0±3.8160.5±5.560.5±5.7158.2±11.886.6±4.1197.2±14.18±215±511±420.4±0.936.7±1.413.8±1.336.2±2.819.8±145.1±3.3
BST16S-114/9/43.7±0.220.8±2.17.6±0.546.7±2.819.8±1.884.9±4.617±618±49±30.9±0.054.8±0.51.8±0.110.8±0.74.6±0.419.7±1.1
BST16S-124/5/42.2±0.219.0±1.84.1±0.731.0±1.918.3±1.871.4±6.717±611±416±60.5±0.044.0±0.40.9±0.16.5±0.43.8±0.415±1.4

The location and sediment type of samples from Bosten lake Basin_

Sample No.Source materialDistance from Lake (km)SiteAltitude (m)
BST16S-1Eolian sand dunesAround 0.05 km41.88N, 87.22E1061
BST16S-2Eolian sand dunesAround 0.07 km41.93N, 87.13E1060
BST16S-3Eolian sand dunesAround 0.10 km41.90N, 86.99E1055
BST16S-14Eolian sand dunesAround 0.19 km42.08N, 87.02E1056
BST16S-4Fluvial sand from Kaidu riverAround 16.29 km41.97N, 86.64E1055
BST16S-5Fluvial sand from Kaidu river041.93N, 86.75E1051
BST16S-6Fluvial sand from Kaidu riverAround 3.33 km41.90N, 86.72E1050
BST16S-7Fluvial sand from Kaidu riverAround 36.14 km42.07N, 86.50E1061
BST16S-8Fluvial sand from Kaidu riverAround 48.54 km42.12N, 86.41E1067
BST16S-9Fluvial sand from Kaidu riverAround 78.92 km42.22N, 86.25E1078
BST16S-10Gravel sand from pluvial fansAround 21.72 km42.31N, 86.91E1166
BST16S-11Gravel sand from pluvial fansAround 20.45 km42.30N, 86.91E1140
BST16S-12Gravel sand from pluvial fansAround 19.59 km42.25N, 87.06E1114

Dose rate data based on Neutron Activation Analysis for samples from Bosten lake Basin_

Sample No.Grain size (μm)U (ppm)Th (ppm)K (%)Observed water content (%)Life average water content (%)Internal dose rate (Gy/ka)Cosmic dose rate (Gy/ka)Dose rate (Gy/ka)
BST16S-190–1251.58 ± 0.074.9 ± 0.171.67 ± 0.060.201 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.333.21 ± 0.06
BST16S-290–1251.08 ± 0.063.74 ± 0.142.29 ± 0.070.401 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.333.66 ± 0.06
BST16S-390–1251.27 ± 0.065.18 ± 0.181.99 ± 0.060.051 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.333.50 ± 0.06
BST16S-1490–1251.44 ± 0.075.33 ± 0.181.62 ± 0.050.031 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.333.16 ± 0.06
BST16S-490–1252.33 ± 0.0911.8 ± 0.331.79 ± 0.064.56 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.83 ± 0.12
BST16S-590–1251.33 ± 0.076.07 ± 0.201.94 ± 0.0624.86 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.37 ± 0.10
BST16S-690–1251.71 ± 0.086.33 ± 0.212.03 ± 0.0632.56 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.72 ± 0.12
BST16S-790–1251.74 ± 0.087.26 ± 0.232.13 ± 0.061.26 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.72 ± 0.11
BST16S-890–1251.67 ± 0.088.56 ± 0.262.09 ± 0.062.76 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.76 ± 0.12
BST16S-990–1251.84 ± 0.088.59 ± 0.262.13 ± 0.068.66 ± 30.46 ± 0.030.333.84 ± 0.12
BST16S-1090–1252.36 ± 0.0912.9 ± 0.362.05 ± 0.062.11 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.344.37 ± 0.07
BST16S-1190–1251.86 ± 0.089.82 ± 0.282.32 ± 0.072.21 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.334.32 ± 0.07
BST16S-1290–1251.97 ± 0.0812.6 ± 0.352.54 ± 0.070.21 ± 0.50.46 ± 0.030.334.77 ± 0.07
Language: English
Page range: 272 - 283
Submitted on: Dec 28, 2018
|
Accepted on: Mar 2, 2020
|
Published on: Dec 31, 2021
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year

© 2021 He Yang, Guoqiang Li, Ming Jin, Haixia Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Christopher Oldknow, Zhong Wang, Xin Huang, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.