References
- Ammon, U. (2012). Linguistic inequality and its effects on participation in scientific discourse and on global knowledge accumulation: With a closer look at the problems of the second-rank language communities. Applied Linguistics Review 3(2), 333–355. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0016 (accessed 10 April 2023).
- Aull, L., & Lancaster, Z. (2014). Linguistic markers of stance in early and advanced academic writing: A corpus-based comparison. Written Communication 31(2), 151–183.
- Burke, K. (1969). A rhetoric of motives. University of California Press.
- Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity Theory. Oxford Academic.
- Calsamiglia, H. (2003). Popularization discourse. Discourse Studies 5(2), 139–146.
- Calsamiglia, H., & Ferrero, C. L. (2003). Role and position of scientific voices: Reported speech in the media. Discourse Studies 5(2), 147–173.
- Canagarajah, A. S. (2012). Migrant ethnic identities, mobile language resources: Identification practices of Sri Lankan Tamil youth. Applied Linguistics Review 3(2), 251–272. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2012-0012
- Chapman, K. (2022). Chemistry textbooks still portray men as scientists while women perform domestic duties. Chemistry world. Royal Society of Chemistry. 6 January. https://www.chemistryworld.com/news/chemistry-textbooks-still-portray-men-as-scientists-while-women-perform-domestic-duties/4014991.article (accessed 21 April 2023)
- Chapman, S. (2022). The Power of partnerships to promote engagement of young people in STEM: International and local perspectives. Gender, Science, and Technology 14(2), 169–175. http://genderandset.open.ac.uk
- Corkhill, A. (1999). Female language theory in the age of Goethe: Three case studies. The Modern Language Review 94(4), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.2307/3737236
- Fu, X., & Hyland, K. (2014). Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Construction 7(1), 122–144.
- Getchell, K., & Beitelspacher, L. S. (2020). Better marketing for female marketers: Gendered language in the Forbes CMO list. Business Horizons 63(5), 607–617.
- Gülich, E. (2003). Conversational techniques used in transferring knowledge between medical experts and non-experts. Discourse Studies 5(2), 235–263.
- Hammer, H. (1997). Symbolic exclusion in statistical literature: The impact of gendered language. The American Statistician 51(1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2684685 (accessed 21 March 2023)
- Hancock, A., & Rubin, B. (2015). Influence of communication partner’s gender on language. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 34(1), 46–64. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X14533197
- Hannah, A., & Murachver, T. (2007). Gender preferential responses to speech. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 26(3), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X06303457 (accessed 19 April 2023)
- Hazenberg, E. (2016). Walking the straight and narrow. Gender and Language 10(2), 270-294. https://doi.org/10.1558/genl.v10i2.19812
- Holmes, J. (2005). Leadership talk: How do leaders ‘do mentoring’, and is gender relevant? Journal of Pragmatics 37(11), 1779–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2005.02.013
- Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins.
- Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum.
- Hyland, K. (2005b). Representing readers in writing: Student and expert practices. Linguistics and Education 16, 363–377.
- Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 9, 116–127.
- Hyland, K., & Jiang, F. (2016). Change of attitude? A diachronic study of stance. Written Communication 33(3), 251–274.
- Lancaster, Z. (2016). Expressing stance in Undergraduate Writing: Discipline-specific and General Qualities,” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 23, 16–30.
- Langer, S. J. (2011). Gender (dis)agreement: A dialogue on the clinical implications of gendered language. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Mental Health 15(3), 300–307.
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.
- Limnios, O. (2022). Fictionality markers in professional scientific articles: A new approach to hedging. English for Specific Purposes Today 10(2), 245–262.
- Luzón, M. J. (2013). Public communication of science in blogs: Recontextualizing scientific discourse for a diversified audience. Written Communication 30(4), 428-457.
- Marchant, J. (2011). Why are so few popular science books written by women? The Guardian, 4 October https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2011/oct/04/popular-science-books-women (accessed 12 April 2011)
- Moirand, S. (2003). Communicative and cognitive dimensions of discourse on science in the French mass media. Discourse Studies 5(2), 175–206.
- Mulac, A., Bradac, J. J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender-as-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research 27(1), 121–152. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2001.tb00778.x
- Murray, C. et al., (2022). Representations of women and men in popular chemistry textbooks in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Chemistry Education Research and Practice 23, 373–384. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1RP00187F (accessed 21 April 2023)
- Myers, G. (1990). Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. The University of Wisconsin Press.
- Myers, G. (2003). Discourse studies of scientific popularisation: questioning the boundaries. Discourse Studies 5(2), 265–279.
- Myers, G. (2010). Discourse of blogs and wikis. Continuum International Publishing.
- Pennebaker, J. (2011). The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us. Bloomsbury Press.
- Pfiester, R. A. (2009). Stereotype threat in mixed-sex dyadic communication (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin).
- Pilkington, O. (2016). Popular science as a means of emotional engagement with the scientific community.” International Journal of Science Culture and Sport 4(1), 118–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.14486/IntJSCS466
- Pilkington, O. (2018). Presented discourse in popular science: Professional voices in books for lay audiences. Brill.
- Pilkington, O. (2019). The language of popular science: Analyzing the communication of advanced ideas to lay readers. McFarland.
- Plug, I. et al., (2020). Do women and men use language differently in spoken face-to-face interaction? A scoping review. Review of Communication Research 9, 43–79. https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.026 (accessed 10 April 2023)
- Prieto-Rodriguez, E. et al., (2022). Investigating the impact of an outreach intervention on girls’ STEM identity formation. Gender, Science and Technology 14(2), 183–206.
- Reid, S., Keerie N., & Palomares, N. (2003). Language, gender salience, and social influence. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(2), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0261927X03022002004 (accessed 19 April 2023)
- Rey, J. (2013). Changing gender roles in popular culture. In Douglas Biber and Susan Conrad (eds.), Variation in English, 138–157. Routledge.
- Roberts, D. C., & Utych, S. M. (2020). Linking gender, language, and partisanship: Developing a database of masculine and feminine words. Political Research Quarterly 73(1), 40–50. hDttOpsI://1d0o.i.1o1rg7/71/01.10167579/1026951919289714988743883
- Ross, M. et al., (2022). Women are credited less in science than men. Nature 608, 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04966-w
- Sleath, B. & R.H. Rubin. 2002. Gender, ethnicity, and physician–patient communication about depression and anxiety in primary care. Patient Education and Counseling 48(3), 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00177-5
- Sohn, B. G. (2022). Designing new Korean mothers, daughters-in-law, and wives: An analysis of Korean textbooks for newly arrived marriage migrants in South Korea. Applied Linguistics Review 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-2016 (accessed 18 April 2023)
- Son, J. Y., & Bell, M. L. (2022). Scientific authorship by gender: Trends before and during a global pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communication 9(348), https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01365-4 (accessed 18 April 2023).
- Stets, J., & Cast, A. (2007). Resources and identity verification from an identity theory perspective. Sociological Perspectives 50(4), 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2007.50.4.517
- Stubbe, M. 2013. Active listening in conversation: gender and the use of verbal feedback. In S. Yamazaki and R.
- Sigley (eds.), Linguistic insights - Studies in language and communication: Approaching language variation through corpora, 365-416. Peter Lang.
- Thomson, R., Murachver, T., & Green, J. (2001). Where is the gender in gendered language? Psychological Science 12(2), 171–175.
- Waara, E., & Shaw, P. (2006). Male and female witnesses’ speech in Swedish criminal trials. HERMES-Journal of Language and Communication in Business 36, 129–156. https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v19i36.25842
- Wu, A. H. (2018). Gendered language on the economics job market rumors forum. Gender Issues in Economics 108, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1257/pandp.20181101
Language: English
Page range: 168 - 186
Published on: Dec 11, 2023
Published by: West University of Timisoara
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2023 Olga A. Limnios, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.