Flood, A. (2019, September 17). Thousands demand Oxford dictionaries “eliminate sexist definitions.” The Guardian. Retrieved from https://amp.theguardian.com/books/2019/sep/17/thousands-demand-oxford-dictionaries-eliminate-sexist-definitions. [Accessed 2021, December 1].
Flood, A. (2020, March 3). Fresh call for Oxford dictionaries to change “sexist” definitions. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2020/mar/03/fresh-call-for-oxford-dictionaries-to-change-sexist-definitions [Accessed 2021, December 1].
Nossem, E. (2018). Queering lexicography: balancing power relations in dictionaries. In B. J. Baer & K. Kaindl (Eds.), Queering Translation, Translating the Queer: Theory, Practice, Activism (pp.172–187). Routledge.
Schwiegershausen, E. (2015, June 25). Wait, cisgender wasn’t in the Oxford English dictionary already? The Cut. Retrieved from https://www.thecut.com/2015/06/wait-cisgender-wasnt-in-the-oed-already.html. [Accessed 2021, December 1].
Straaijer, R. (2009). Deontic and epistemic modals as indicators of prescriptive and descriptive language in the grammars of Joseph Priestley and Robert Lowth. In I. Tieken-Boon van Ostade & W. van der Wurff (Eds.), Current Issues in Late Modern English (pp. 57-87). Peter Lang.
The Romanian Academy. (2016, Revised 2nd ed.). DEX. Dicționarul explicativ al limbii române [The Explanatory Dictionary of the Romanian Language]. Univers Enciclopedic.
Turton, S. (2020). Redefining realness: bringing queer performativity to the English dictionary. Journal of Language and Sexuality, 9(2), 101-126.10.1075/jls.19012.tur
Wilton, David. (2014). Rethinking the prescriptivist-descriptivist dyad: Motives and methods in two eighteenth-century grammars. English Today, 30(3), 38-47.10.1017/S026607841400025X