References
- Aristotle (1983). On the Art of Poetry. In T.S. Dorsch (Ed.). Classical Literary Criticism. Penguin Books.
- Everett, B. (2001). Much Ado About Nothing: The Unsociable Comedy. In M. Wynne-Davies (Ed.). Much Ado About Nothing and The Taming of The Shrew (pp.51-68). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Hartmann, H. (1981). The unhappy marriage of Marxism and Feminism: Towards a more progressive union. In L. Sargent (Ed.). Women and Revolution: A Discussion of the Unhappy Marriage of Marxism and Feminism (pp.1-41). South End Press.
- Hawkes, T. (1992) Meaning By Shakespeare. Routledge.
- Howard, J. (2001). Antitheatricality Staged: The Workings of Ideology in Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing. In M. Wynne-Davies (Ed.). Much Ado About Nothing and The Taming of The Shrew (pp.103-122). Palgrave Macmillan.
- Jardine, L. (1996). Reading Shakespeare Historically. Routledge.
- Mulvey, L. (1999). Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. In S. Thornham (Ed.). Feminist Film Theory: A Reader. Edinburgh University Press.
- Sedgwick, E. (2015). Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. Columbia University Press.
- Shakespeare, W. (2016). Much Ado About Nothing. C. McEachern (Ed.). Bloomsbury.
- Sinfield, A. (1992). Faultlines: Cultural Materialism and the Politics of Dissident Reading. Oxford University Press.
- Thompson, A. (Ed.). (2021). The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Race. Cambridge University Press.
- Weimann, R. (1978). Shakespeare and the Popular Tradition in the Theater: Studies in the Social Dimension of Dramatic Form and Function. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Language: English
Page range: 17 - 30
Published on: Dec 27, 2021
Published by: West University of Timisoara
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Paul Innes, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.