Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Female Gender Marginality in the Imperial Roman World: Affinity Between Women and Slaves in their Shared Stereotypes and Penetrability Cover

Female Gender Marginality in the Imperial Roman World: Affinity Between Women and Slaves in their Shared Stereotypes and Penetrability

Gender Studies
Volume 18 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Feb 2020

References

  1. Allen, P. 1997. <em>The Concept of Woman: The Aristotelian Revolution,</em> 750 B.C.–C.E. 1250. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eeerdmans.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Arjava, A. 1996. <em>Women and Laws in Late Antiquity</em>. Oxford: Clarendon Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198150336.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780198150336.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Ashforth, B. E. and Mael, F. 1989. “Social Identity Theory and the Organization.” <em>The Academy of Management Review</em> 14/1 (1989), pp. 20–39.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5465/amr.1989.4278999</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Barber, J. 1955. <em>The Road from Eden: Studies in Christianity and Culture.</em> Palo Alto, CA: Academica Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bauman, R. 1992. <em>Women and Politics in Ancient Rome.</em> London &amp; New York: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Beauvoir, S. 1973. <em>The Second Sex</em>. New York: Vintage Books.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Bierkan, A. T., C. P. Sherman, and E. Stocquart. 1907. “Marriage in Roman Law.” <em>The Yale Law Journal</em>, 16/5 (1907), pp. 303–327.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/785389" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/785389</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Billings, D. W. 2017. <em>Acts of the Apostles and the Rhetoric of Roman Imperialism.</em> New York: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316946251" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/9781316946251</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Birke, L. 2001. “In Pursuit of Difference: Scientific Studies of Women and Men” in <em>The Gender and Science Reader</em>, M. Lederman &amp; I. Bartsch (eds.). London &amp; New York: Routledge, pp. 309–322.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Boserup, E. 1970. <em>Woman’s Role in Economic Development</em>. London: George Allen &amp; Unwin Ltd.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Brown, R. 1995. “Livy’s Sabine Women and the Ideal of <em>Concordia</em>.” <em>Transactions of the American Philological Society</em>, 12 (1995), pp. 291–319.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/284357" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/284357</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Brownmiller, S. 1975. <em>Against Our Will, Men, Women and Rape.</em> New York: Simon &amp; Schuster.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Brundage, J. A. 1987. <em>Law, Sex and Christian Society in Medieval Europe.</em> Cambridge: Harvard University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226077895.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7208/chicago/9780226077895.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Butler, J. 1990. <em>Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity</em>. New York &amp; London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Clark, G. 1993. <em>Women in Late Antiquity.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198146759.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780198146759.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Clark, P. 1998. “Women, Slaves and the Hierarchies of Domestic Violence” in <em>Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations</em>, S. R. Joshel and S. Murnaghan (eds.). London &amp; New York: Routledge, pp. 109–129.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Clark, P. A. and Rose, M. L. 2013. “Psychiatric Disability and the Galenic Medical Matrix” in <em>Disabilities in Roman Antiquity: Disparate Bodies, a capite ad calcem</em>, Christian Laes, et al (eds.). Leiden: Brill, pp. 45–72.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004251250_004" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1163/9789004251250_004</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Cloke, G. 1995. <em>This Female Man of God: Women and Spiritual Power in the Patristic Age, AD 350–450.</em> London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Condor, S. G. 1986. “Sex Role Beliefs and ‘Traditional’ Women: Feminist and Intergroup Perspectives” in <em>Feminist Social Psychology</em>, S. Wilkinson (ed.). Milton Keynes: Open University Press, pp. 97–118.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Connell, R. W. 2005. <em>Masculinities</em>. Cambridge: Polity Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Coole, L. 1988. <em>Women in Political Theory: From Ancient Misogyny to Contemporary Feminism.</em> Sussex: Wheatsheaf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Culham, P. 2014. “Women in the Roman Republic” in <em>The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic</em>, H. I. Flower (ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 139–159.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521807948.007" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CCOL0521807948.007</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Dixon, S. 1988. <em>The Roman Mother.</em> London: University of Oklahoma Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Dixon, S. 2001. <em>Reading Roman Women: Sources, Genres and Real Life.</em> London: Duckworth.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Doherty, L. E. 2001. <em>Gender and the Interpretation of Classical Myth</em>. London: Duckworth.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Dossey, L. 2008. “Wife Beating and Manliness in Late Antiquity.” <em>Past and Present</em> 199 (2008), pp. 3–40.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/pastj/gtn003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/pastj/gtn003</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Douglas, M. 1966. <em>Purity and Danger.</em> New York &amp; London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Dover, K. J. 1989. <em>Greek Homosexuality</em>. London &amp; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Edwards, T. 2006. <em>Cultures of Masculinity.</em> London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Engel, D. M. 2000. “The Gender Egalitarianism of Musonius Rufus.” <em>Ancient Philosophy</em> 20 (2000), pp. 377–391.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil200020235" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.5840/ancientphil200020235</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Fagan, G. G. 2011. “Violence in Roman Social Relations.” <em>The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations</em>, M. Peachin (ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195188004.013.0022" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195188004.013.0022</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Finley, M. I. 2002. “The Silent Women of Rome” in <em>Sexuality and Gender in the Classical World: Reading and Source</em>, L. K. McClure (ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, pp. 147–162.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470756188.ch5" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/9780470756188.ch5</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Foster, W. H. 2010. <em>Gender, Mastery and Slavery: From European to Atlantic World Frontiers</em>. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-31358-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-0-230-31358-3</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Fox, R. L. 1987. <em>Pagans and Christians</em>. New York: Knopf.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Frier, B. W. and T. A. J. McGinn. 2004. <em>A Casebook on Roman Family Law</em>. New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195161854.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780195161854.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Gaca, K. L. 2011. “Girls, Women, and the Significance of Sexual Violence in Ancient Warfare” in <em>Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones</em>, E. Heineman (ed.). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 73–88.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.9783/9780812204346.73" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.9783/9780812204346.73</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Gardner, J. F. 1986. <em>Women in Roman Law and Society</em>. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203317099" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9780203317099</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Garlan, Y. 1988. <em>Slavery in Ancient Greece</em>. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Garner, B. A. 2004. <em>Black’s Law Dictionary.</em> 8<sup>th</sup> ed., St. Paul, MN: West Group.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Garnsey, P. and R. P. Saller. 1987. <em>The Roman Empire: Economy, Society and Culture</em>. California: University of California Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Gillian, C. 1993. <em>Women in Late Antiquity: Pagan and Christian Life Styles.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Gordon, P. 2002. “Some Unseen Monster: Rereading Lucretius on Sex” in <em>Roman Gaze: Vision, Power, and the Body.</em> Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 86–109.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Hacker, H. M. 1951. “Women as a Minority Group,” <em>Social Forces</em> 30, 1, pp. 60–69.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2571742" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/2571742</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Hall, E. T. 1959. <em>The Silent Language</em>. New York: Doubleday.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Hallett, J. P. 1989. “Women as <em>Same</em> and <em>Other</em> in the Classical Roman Elite.” <em>Helios</em> 16/1 (1989), pp. 59–78.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Hallett, J. P. 2012. “Women in Augustan Rome” in <em>A Companion to Women in the Ancient World</em>, S. L. James and S. Dillon (eds.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell, pp. 372–384.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444355024.ch27" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/9781444355024.ch27</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  47. Halperin, D. 1990. <em>One Hundred Years of Homosexuality and Other Essays on Greek Love.</em> New York &amp; London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  48. Harper, K. 2011. <em>Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275–425</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973451" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511973451</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  49. Hill, L. 2001. “The First Wave of Feminism: Were the Stoics Feminists?” <em>History of Political Thought</em> 22 (2001), pp. 13–40.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  50. Jeffers, J. A. 1999. <em>The Greco-Roman World of the New Testament Era: Exploring the Background of Early Christianity.</em> Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  51. Joshel, S. R. 1992. <em>Work, Identity, and Legal Status at Rome: A Study of the Occupational Inscription.</em> Norman and London: University of Oklahoma Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  52. Joshel, S. R. 2010. <em>Slavery in the Roman World</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  53. Joshel, S. R. and S. Murnaghan. 1998. “Introduction: Differential Equations” in <em>Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations</em>, S. R. Joshel and S. Murnaghan (eds.). London &amp; New York: Routledge, pp. 1–21.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  54. Kadish, S. H. and S. J. Schulhofer. 2001. <em>Criminal Law and Its Processes: Cases and Materials.</em> 7<sup>th</sup> ed., New York: Wolters Kluwer.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  55. Kassen, W. 1984. “Musonius Rufus, Jesus, and Paul: Three First-Century Feminists” in <em>From Jesus to Paul: Studies in Honour of Francis Wright Beare</em>, P. Richardson and J. C. Hurd (eds.). Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, pp. 185–206.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.51644/9780889206335-019" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.51644/9780889206335-019</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  56. Kerber L. K., J. S. De Hart, and C. H. Dayton. 1995. <em>Women’s America</em>, 4<sup>th</sup> ed. New York: Basil Blackwell.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  57. Larson, J. 2012. <em>Greek and Roman Sexualities: A Sourcebook</em>. London: Bloomsbury.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  58. Lerner, G. 1986. <em>The Creation of Patriarchy</em>. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  59. Llewellyn-Jones, L. 2011. “Domestic Abuse and Violence against Women in Ancient Greece” in <em>Social Man: Essays on Ancient Greek Social Behaviour in Honour of Nick Fisher</em>, S. D. Lambert (ed.). Swansea: Classical Press of Wales, pp. 231–266.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvvn9fm.16" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/j.ctvvn9fm.16</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  60. Loraux, N. 1993. <em>The Children of Athena. Athenian Ideas about Citizenship and the Division between the Sexes</em>, translated by C. Levine. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691236834" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/9780691236834</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  61. McGinn, T. A. J. 2002. “The Augustan Marriage Legislation and Social Practice: Elite Endogamy versus Male ‘Marrying Down’” <em>Speculum Iuris: Roman Law as a Reflection on Social and Economic Life in Antiquity</em>, J. J. Aubert and B. Sirks (eds.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 46–93.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  62. Miles, G. 1995. <em>Reconstructing Early Rome.</em> Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  63. Milnor, K. 2005. <em>Gender, Domesticity and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  64. Mitchell, L. E. 2008. “Women and Roman Law” in <em>The Oxford Encyclopedia of Women in World History</em>, B. G. Smith (ed.). Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press, p. 425.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  65. Moses, D. C. 1993. “Livy’s Lucretia and the Validity of Coerced Consent in Roman Law” in <em>Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies,</em> A. E. Laiou (ed.). Dumbarton: Dumbarton Oaks, pp. 39–82
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  66. Myers, A. D. 2017. <em>Blessed Among Women?: Mothers &amp; Motherhood in the New Testament.</em> New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190677084.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780190677084.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  67. Nguyen, N. N. 2006. “Roman Rape: An Overview of Roman Rape Laws from the Republican Period to Justinian’s Reign.” <em>Michigan Journal of Gender and Law</em>, 13/1 (2006), pp. 75–112.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  68. Noy, D. “Wicked Stepmothers in Roman Society and Imagination” <em>Journal of Family History</em>, 16 (1991), pp. 345–61.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/036319909101600402" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/036319909101600402</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  69. Oakley, A. 1972. <em>Sex, Gender, and Society</em>. London: Temple Smith.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  70. O’Brien, J. M. 2014. <em>The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Gender Studies</em>. Vol. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/acref:obso/9780199836994.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/acref:obso/9780199836994.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  71. Osiek, C and J. Pouya. 2010. “Constructions of Gender in the Roman Imperial World” in <em>Understanding the Social World of the New Testament</em>, D. Neufeld and R. DeMaris (eds.). London and New York: Routledge, pp. 44–56.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  72. Parker, H. N. 1998. “Loyal Slaves and Loyal Wives: The Crisis of the Outsider-Within and Roman Exemplum Literature” in <em>Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations</em>. London: Routledge, pp. 152–173.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  73. Patterson, O. 1982. <em>Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study.</em> Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  74. Phang, S. E. 2008. <em>Roman Military Service: Ideologies of Discipline in the Late Republic and Early Principate.</em> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511497872" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511497872</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  75. Pomeroy, S. B. 1975. <em>Goddesses, Whores, Slaves: Women in classical Antiquity</em>. New York: Schocken Books.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  76. Russell, J. C. 1958. <em>Late Ancient and Medieval Population</em>, vol. 48. 3. Philadelphia, PA: American Philosophical Society.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1005708" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/1005708</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  77. Richlin, A. 1992. <em>The Garden of Priapus: Sexuality and Aggression in Roman Humor.</em> New York: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195068733.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780195068733.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  78. Ruggini, L. C. 1989. “Juridical Status and Historical Role of Women in Roman Patriarchal Society.” <em>Klio</em> 71 (1989), pp. 604–619.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112525067-034" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/9783112525067-034</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  79. Saller, R. P. 1991. “Corporeal Punishment, Authority, and Obedience in the Roman Household” in <em>Marriage, Divorce, and Children in Ancient Rome</em>, Beryl Rawson (ed.). Oxford, U.K, pp. 115–144.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198149187.003.0008" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780198149187.003.0008</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  80. Saller, R. P.1994. <em>Patriarchy, Property and Death in the Roman Family</em>. New York: Cambridge University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511582998" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1017/CBO9780511582998</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  81. Saller, R. P. 1998. “Symbols of Gender and Status Hierarchies in the Roman Household” in <em>Women and Slaves in Greco-Roman Culture: Differential Equations</em>, S. R. Joshel &amp; S. Murnaghan (eds.). London &amp; New York: Routledge, pp. 85–91.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  82. Segal, E. 1987. <em>Roman Laughter: The Comedy of Plautus</em>. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  83. Severy, B. 2003. <em>Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman Empire</em>. London and New York: Routledge.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203211434" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4324/9780203211434</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  84. Skinner, M. 1997. “Introduction” in <em>Roman Sexualities</em>, J. Hallett and M. Skinner (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 3–25.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  85. Smart, C. 1990. “Law’s Power, the Sexed Body, and Feminist Discourse.” <em>Journal of Law and Society</em>, 17/2 (1990), pp. 194–210.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.2307/1410085" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2307/1410085</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  86. Stichele, C. V. and T. Penner. 2009. <em>Contextualizing Gender in Early Christian Discourse.</em> London &amp; New York: Bloomsbury.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  87. Tajfel, H. and Turner, J. C. 1986. “The Social Identity Theory of Inter-Group Behavior” in <em>Psychology of Intergroup Relations</em>, S. Worchel and L. W. Austin (eds.). 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, pp. 7–24.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  88. Terry, D. J. and M. A. Hogg. 1996. “Group Norms and the Attitude-Behavior Relationship. A Role for Group Identification.” <em>Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</em> 22 (1996), pp. 776–793.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167296228002" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/0146167296228002</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  89. Treggiari, S. 1991. <em>Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuge from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian.</em> Oxford: Oxford University Press.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198148906.001.0001" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1093/oso/9780198148906.001.0001</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  90. Veyne, P. 2002. <em>The Roman Empire</em>, translated by Arthur Goldhammer. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  91. Walters, J. 1997. “Invading the Roman Body: Manliness and Impenetrability in Roman Thought” in <em>Roman Sexualities</em>, J. P. Hallett and M. B. Skinner (eds.). Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 29–46.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691219547-003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1515/9780691219547-003</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  92. Watson, P. 1995. <em>Ancient Stepmothers: Myth, Misogyny and Reality</em>. Leiden: Brill.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004329485" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1163/9789004329485</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  93. Wiesner, M. E. 2000. <em>Women and Gender in Early Modern Europe</em>. 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  94. Wilchins, R. A. 2004. <em>Queer Theory, Gender Theory: An Instant Primer</em>. Los Angeles: Alyson Books.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  95. Williams, J. A. and H. Giles. 1978. “The Changing Status of Women in Society: An Intergroup Perspective” in <em>Differentiation between Social Groups</em>, H. Tajfelé (ed.). London: Academic, pp. 431–446.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  96. Wilson, M. I. and M. Daly. 1996. “Male Sexual Proprietariness and Violence against Wives.” <em>Current Directions in Psychological Sciences</em> 5 (1996), pp. 2–7.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772668" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1111/1467-8721.ep10772668</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  97. Wilson, M. I. and M. Daly. 1998. “Lethal and Nonlethal Violence against Wives and the Evolution Psychology of Male Sexual Proprietariness.” in <em>Rethinking Violence Against Women</em>, R. Dobash (ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 199–230.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452243306.n8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.4135/9781452243306.n8</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  98. Winkler, J. J. 1990. <em>The Constraints of Desire.</em> New York &amp; London: Routledge.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  99. Witten, T. M. 2003. “Transgender and Transsexuality” in <em>Encyclopedia of Sex and Gender: Men and Women in the World’s Cultures</em>, C. R. Ember &amp; M. Ember (eds.). Vol. 2. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 216–229.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  100. Wyke, M. 1994. “Women in the Mirror: the Rhetoric of Adornment in the Roman World” in <em>Women in Ancient Societies: An Illusion of the Night</em>, L. J. Archer, S. Fischler &amp; M. Wyke (eds.). London: Macmillan, pp. 134–151.<dgdoi:pub-id xmlns:dgdoi="http://degruyter.com/resources/doi-from-crossref" pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23336-6_8" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1007/978-1-349-23336-6_8</a></dgdoi:pub-id>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  101. Zeitlin, F. 1996. <em>Playing the Other: Gender and Society in Classical Greek Literature</em>. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/genst-2020-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2286-0134 | Journal ISSN: 1583-980X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 26
Published on: Feb 1, 2020
Published by: West University of Timisoara
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 times per year
Keywords:
affinity between women and slaves,
female social marginality,
gender disparity,
sex and gender,
sexual and domestic abuse
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology, other

© 2020 Inhee C. Berg Inhee Cho, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Volume 18 (2019): Issue 1 (December 2019)Next article