Have a personal or library account? Click to login
ANIMAL METAPHORS AND SEMANTIC DEROGATION – DO WOMEN THINK DIFFERENTLY FROM MEN? Cover

ANIMAL METAPHORS AND SEMANTIC DEROGATION – DO WOMEN THINK DIFFERENTLY FROM MEN?

Gender Studies
Volume 12 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)
By: Silaški Nadežda  
Open Access
|Feb 2014

References

  1. Cameron, L. and A. Deignan. 2006. “The Emergence of Metaphor in Discourse”. Applied Linguistics 27: 671-690.
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. Deignan, A. 2003. “Metaphorical expressions and culture: An indirect link”. Metaphor and Symbol 18: 255-271.
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. Deignan, A. 2005. Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. Fontecha, A. F. and R. M. J. Catalán. 2003. “Semantic Derogation in Animal Metaphor: a Contrastive-Cognitive Analysis of Two Male/Female Examples in English and Spanish”. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 771-797.
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. Halupka-Rešetar, S. and B. Radić. 2003. “Animal Names Used in Addressing People in Serbian”. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1891-1902.
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. Hsieh, S. C. 2006. “A Corpus-based Study on Animal Expressions in Mandarin Chinese and German”. Journal of Pragmatics 38: 2206-2222.
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. Kövecses, Z. 2002. Metaphor. A Practical Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press Lakoff, G. and M. Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. López Rodríguez, I. 2007. “The Representation of Women in Teenage and Women’s Magazines: Recurring Metaphors in English”. Estudios Ingleses de la Universidad Complutense 15: 15-42.
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. López Rodríguez, I. 2009. “Of Women, Bitches, Chickens and Vixens: Animal Metaphors for Women in English and Spanish”. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación/Culture, Language and Representation VII\2009: 77-100.
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. Nilsen, A. P. 1996. “Of Lady Bugs and Billy Goats: What Animal Species Names Tell about Human Perceptions of Gender”. Metaphor and Symbolic Activity 11: 257-271.
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. Prodanović-Stankić, D. 2004. “Metafore s nazivima životinja u engleskom i srpskom jeziku”. Zbornik Matice srpske za filologiju i lingvistiku XLVII (1-2): 131-145.
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. Radden, G. and Z. Kövecses. 1999. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy” in Metonymy in Language and Thought. K.-U Panther and G. Radden (Eds.). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, pp. 17-59.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. Silaški, N. (2011). “Animal Metaphors in Some Business-related Terms in English”. Radovi Filozofskog fakulteta u Istočnom Sarajevu 13(1): 565-576.
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. Silaški, N. and T. Đurović. 2010. “Catching Inflation by the Tail - Animal Metaphoric Imagery in the Conceptualisation of INFLATION in English”. Ibérica 20: 57-80.
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. Talebinejad, M. R. and H. V. Dastjerdi. 2005. “A Cross-Cultural Study of Animal Metaphors: When Owls Are Not Wise!”, Metaphor and Symbol 20(2): 133-150.
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/genst-2013-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2286-0134 | Journal ISSN: 1583-980X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 319 - 332
Published on: Feb 14, 2014
Published by: West University of Timisoara
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 1 issue per year
Keywords:
animal metaphor,
Conceptual Metaphor Theory,
semantic derogation,
Serbian
Related subjects:
Social sciences,
Sociology,
Sociology, other

© 2014 Silaški Nadežda, published by West University of Timisoara
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons License.

Previous articleVolume 12 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)Next article