THE UNFOLDING OF TRUTH AND SELF-REPRESENTATION WITHIN THE CRACKED MIRROR IN SHAKESPEARE’S RICHARD II

Neslihan Ekmekçioğlu

doi:10.2478/genst-2013-0003

.blurhash-client-img { display: none !important; }

THE UNFOLDING OF TRUTH AND SELF-REPRESENTATION WITHIN THE CRACKED MIRROR IN SHAKESPEARE’S RICHARD II

Gender Studies

Volume 12 (2013): Issue 1 (December 2013)

By: Neslihan Ekmekçioğlu

Open Access

|Feb 2014

Abstract

Shakespeare’s Richard II deals with the controversy between the divine and the mortal aspects of the King. According to Kantorowicz’s The King’s Two Bodies, the King had two bodies: a Body Natural and a Body Politic. In the deposition scene of the play, Richard exploits the divine authority by undoing himself as if in a sacramental ceremony and asks for a mirror in order to see whether the change in his kingly nature has affected his face. My paper will deal with the unfolding of unendurable truth and the self-representation of Richard II in the duality of his image within the cracked mirror.

References

Barker, Philip. 1998. Michel Foucault: An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinbugh University Thomas. 1612 (1597). The Theatre of Gods Iudgements. London 1612 Edn. ‘The Preface’.
Search in Google Scholar
Bevan, Bryan. 1990. King Richard II. London: The Rubicon Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Brooke, Nicholas. 1973. Richard II: A Selection of Critical Essays. London: Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar
Fletcher, Christopher. 2008. Richard II: Manhood, Youth and Politics, 1377-99. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Goddard, Harold. C. 1951. The Meaning of Shakespeare. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen. 1992. “Invisible Bullets: Renaissance Authority and its Subversion, Henry IV and Henry V.” in New Historicism and Renaissance Drama. Richard Wilson & Richard Dutton. ( Eds.) London: Longman, pp. 83- 108.
Search in Google Scholar
--. 2005. Renaissance Self-Fashioning: From More to Shakespeare. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1985 (1651). Leviathan. London: Penguin.
Search in Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham. 2000. Shakespeare: The Histories. London: Macmillan.
Search in Google Scholar
Kahn, Coppélia. 1992. “The Shadow of the Male” in Shakespeare’s History Plays: Richard II to Henry V. Graham Holderness (Ed.). London: Macmillan, pp. 74- 85.
Search in Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, E.H. 1981. The King’s Two Bodies. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Levin, Carole. 1996. The Heart and Stomach of a King: Elizabeth I and the Politics of Sex and Power. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Montini, Donatella. 1999. “The Regal Illusion: Machiavellian Strategies in the Speeches of Elizabeth I and in Shakespeare’s Henry V” in Shakespeare and Italy Holger Klein and Michele Marrapodi(Eds.). Lewiston: The Edwin Meller Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Pye, Christopher. 1990. The Regal Phantasm: Shakespeare and the Politics of Spectacle. London: Routledge.
Search in Google Scholar
Schwartz, Murray. 1982. “Anger, Wounds and the Forms of Theater in King Richard II: Notes for a Psychoanalytical Interpretation” in Essays: Critical Approaches To Mediaeval and Renaissance Texts. Vol.2. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Search in Google Scholar
Ure, Peter. ( Ed. ).1961. King Richard II. The Arden Shakespeare. London: Methuen.
Search in Google Scholar
Winny, James. 1968. The Player King: A Theme of Shakespeare’s Histories. London: Barnes & Noble.
Search in Google Scholar