Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Behavioural Response and Weight of Broiler Chickens Reared Under Different Artificial Light Sources Cover

Behavioural Response and Weight of Broiler Chickens Reared Under Different Artificial Light Sources

Open Access
|Oct 2021

References

  1. 1. Adeleye, O. O., Abatan, M. O., Faniyi, O. O., Egbeyale, L. T., Adesehinwa, A. O. K., 2017: Performance of broiler birds reared under different light sources. In Proceedings of the 6th ASAN-NIAS Joint Annual Meeting, Abuja, Nigeria, September 10—14, 554—557.
  2. 2. Alvino, G. M., Blatchford, R. A., Archer, G. S., Mench, J. A., 2009: Light intensity during rearing affects the behavioural synchrony and resting patterns of broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci., 50, 275—283. DOI: 10.1080/00071660902942775.10.1080/00071660902942775
  3. 3. Bizeray, D., Estevez, I., Leterrier, C., Faure, J. M., 2002: Effects of increasing environmental complexity on the physical activity of broiler chickens. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 79, 27—41. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00083-7.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00083-7
  4. 4. Bokkers, A. M., Koene, P., 2003: The behaviour of fast- and slow-growing broilers to 12 weeks of age and the physical consequences. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 81, 59—72. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00251-4.10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00251-4
  5. 5. Bokkers, A. M., Zimmerman, P. H., Bas Rodenburg, T., Koene, P., 2007: Walking behaviour of heavy and light broilers in an operant runway test with varying durations of feed deprivation and feed access. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 108, 129—142. DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.011.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.10.011
  6. 6. Boshouwers, F. M., Nicaise, E., 1993: Artificial light sources and their influence on physical activity and energy expenditure of laying hens. Br. Poult. Sci., 34, 11—19. DOI: 10.1080/00071669308417558.10.1080/000716693084175588467392
  7. 7. Buijs, S., Keeling, L. J., and Tuyttens, F. A., 2011: Using motivation to feed as a way to assess the importance of space for broiler chickens. Anim. Behav., 81, 145—151. DOI: 10.1016/j. anbehav.2010.09.027.
  8. 8. Burrow, N., 2008: Energy Efficiency in Poultry House Lighting. http://www2.ca.uky.edu/poultryprofitability/Funding/Energy_Efficiency_in_Poultry_House_Lighting.pdf. Accessed on February 22, 2019.
  9. 9. Cindy, H., Eddie, B., Bram, B., Ingrid, J., Arni, J., Peter, G. K., 2011: Brief of requirements of the broiler. Livestock Research Wageningen Ur. Report 517. https://edepot.wur.nl/179828.
  10. 10. Costa, L. S., Pereira, D. F., Bueno, L. G. F., Pandorfi, H., 2012: Some aspects of chicken behaviour and welfare. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 14, 3, 159—164. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X201 2000300001.
  11. 11. Deep, A., Schwean-Lardner, K., Crowe, T. G., Fancher, B. I., Classen, H. L., 2012: Effect of light intensity on broiler behaviour and diurnal rhythms. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 136, 1, 50—56. DOI: 10.3382/ps.2010-00964.10.3382/ps.2010-0096420952694
  12. 12. Dharmaretnam, M., Rogers, L. J., 2005: Hemispheric specialization and dual processing in strongly versus weekly lateralized chicks. Behav. Brain Res., 162, 62—70. DOI: 10.1016/j. bbr.2005.03.012.
  13. 13. Ghuffar, K., Muhammad, S., Fawwad, A., Mahmood, A., 2009: Impact of various lighting source (incandescent, fluorescent, metal halide and high pressure sodium) on the production performance of chicken broilers. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 6, 1, 40—45.
  14. 14. Ingram, D. R., Hatten, L. F., 2000: Effects of light restriction on broiler performance and specific body structure measurements. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 9, 501—504.10.1093/japr/9.4.501
  15. 15. Kristensen, H. H., Prescott, N. B., Perry, G. C., Ladewig, J., Ersboll, A. K., Overvard, K. C., 2007: The behaviour of broiler chickens in different light sources and illuminances. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 103, 75—89.10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.017
  16. 16. Manser, C. E., 1996: Effects of lighting on the welfare of domestic poultry: a review. Anim. Welfare, 5, 341 360.
  17. 17. Minitab 17 Statistical Software, 2010: Minitab reference manual: Macintosh version, release 8. State College, PA. Minitab, Inc. (www.minitab.com).
  18. 18. Mohammed, H. H., Grashorn, M. A., Bessei, W., 2009: The effects of lighting conditions on the behaviour of laying birds. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 74, 3, 197—202. http://www.archiv-fuer-gefluegelkunde.
  19. 19. Olanrewaju, H. A., Thaxton, J. P., Dozier, W. A., Purswell, J., Roush, W. B., Branton, S. L., 2006: A review of lighting programs for broiler production. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 5, 301—308. DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2006.301.308.10.3923/ijps.2006.301.308
  20. 20. Prayitno, D. S., Philips, C. J. C., Omed, H., 1997: The effect of colour and lighting on the behaviour and production of meat chickens. Poult. Sci., 76, 452—457. DOI: 10.1093/ps/76.3.452.10.1093/ps/76.3.4529068043
  21. 21. Senaratna, D., Samarakone, T. S., Madusanka, A. P., Gunawarddene, D. A., 2012: Preference of broiler chicken for different light colours in relation to age, session of the day and behaviour. Trop. Agric. Res., 23, 3, 193—203. DOI: 10.4038/tar. v23i3.4657.
  22. 22. Tavares, B. O., Pereira, D. F., Bueno, L. G., Silva, G. F., 2015: The behaviour of layers under different light sources. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 17, 4, 511—516. DOI: 10.1590/1516-635X1704 511-516.
  23. 23. Vandenberg, C., Widowski, T. M., 2000: Hens preferences for high-intensity high-pressure sodium or low-intensity incandescent lighting. J. Appl. Poult. Sci., 9, 172—178. DOI: 10. 1093/japr/9.2.172.10.1093/japr/9.2.172
  24. 24. Villagrá, A., Olivas, I., Althaus, R. L., Gómez, E. A., Lain-ez, M., Torres, A. G., 2014: The behaviour of broiler chickens in four different substrates: a choice test. Braz. J. Poult. Sci., 16, 1, 67—76. DOI: 10.1590/S1516-635X2014000100010.10.1590/S1516-635X2014000100010
  25. 25. Weeks, C. A., Nicol, C. J., Sherwin, C. M., Kestin, S. C., 1994: Comparison of the behaviour of broiler chickens in indoor and free-range environments. Anim. Welfare, 3, 179—192.
  26. 26. Weeks, C. A., Danbury, T. D., Davies, H. C., Hunt, P., Kestin, S. C., 2000: The behaviour of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 67, 111—125. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(99)00102-1.10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00102-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fv-2021-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7837 | Journal ISSN: 0015-5748
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 8
Submitted on: May 5, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 19, 2021
Published on: Oct 5, 2021
Published by: The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 O. O. Adeleye, O. M. Oso, A. O. Fafiolu, O. A. Dosumu, O. E. Oke, M. O. Abatan, A. S. James, A. V. Jegede, A. O. K. Adesehinwa, published by The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.