Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Difference in the Mucus Organization Between the Small and Large Intestine and Its Protection of Selected Natural Substances. A Review Cover

The Difference in the Mucus Organization Between the Small and Large Intestine and Its Protection of Selected Natural Substances. A Review

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. 1. Abiodun, O. O., Rodriguez-Nogales, A., Algieri, F., Gomez-Caravaca, A. M., Segura-Carretero, A., Utrilla, M. P., et al., 2016: Antiinflamatory and immunomodulatory activity of an ethanolic extract from the stem bark of Terminalia catappa L. (Combretaceae): in vitro and in vivo evidences. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 192, 309—319.10.1016/j.jep.2016.07.056
  2. 2. Aliakbarpour, H. R., Chamani, M., Rahimi, G., Sadeghi, A. A., Qujeq, D., 2012: The Bacillus subtilis and lactic acid bacteria probiotics influence intestinal mucin gene expression, histomorphology and growth performance in broilers. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci., 25, 1285—1293.10.5713/ajas.2012.12110
  3. 3. Bäckström, M., Ambort, D., Thomsson, E., Johansson, M. E., Hansson, G. C., 2013: Increased understanding of the biochemistry and biosynthesis of MUC2 and other gel-forming mucins through the recombinant expression of their protein domains. Mol. Biotechnol., 54, 250—256.10.1007/s12033-012-9562-3
  4. 4. Bermudez-Brito, M., Plaza-Díaz, J., Muñoz-Quezada, S., Gómez-Llorente, C., Gil A., 2012: Probiotic Mechanisms of Action. Ann. Nutr. Metab., 61, 160—174.10.1159/000342079
  5. 5. Blaschek, H. P., Wang, H. H., Agle, M. E., 2007:Biofilms in the Food Environment, 1st edn., IFT Press, Blackwell Publishing Iowa, USA, 193 pp.10.1002/9780470277782
  6. 6. Birchenough, G. M. H., Johansson, M. E. V., Gustafsson, J. K., Bergström, J. H., Hansson, G. C., 2015: New developments in goblet cell mucus secretion and function. Mucosal Immunol., 8, 712—719.10.1038/mi.2015.32
  7. 7. Cani, P. D., 2018: A brief overview of the mechanisms of action by which traditional and next-generation probiotics affect host health. Gut Microbiota, Research and Practice, https://www.gutmicrobiotaforhealth.com/en/brief-overview-mechanisms-action-traditional-next-generation-probiotics-affect-host-health/.
  8. 8. Cornick, S., Tawiah, A., Chadee, K., 2015: Roles and regulation of the mucus barrier in the gut. Tissue Barriers, 3, e982426.10.4161/21688370.2014.982426
  9. 9. Čapkovičová, A., Maková, Z., Piešová, E., Faix, Š., Alves, A., Faixová, Z., 2012: Evaluation of effects of Thymus vulgaris extract on metabolism and gut mucus in chicks. Folia Veterinaria, 56, 21—27.
  10. 10. Čapkovičová, A., Maková, Z., Piešová, E., Alves, A., Faix, Š., Faixová, Z., 2014: Evaluation of the effects of Salvia officinalis essential oil on plasma biochemistry, gut mucus and quantity of acidic and neutral mucins in the chicken gut. Acta Vet. Beograd, 64, 138—148.10.2478/acve-2014-0014
  11. 11. Demeterová, M., Šamudovská, A., Faixová, Z. Maková, Z., Piešová, E., Bujňák, L., 2012: Purified β–glucan from oyster mushrooms (pleurotus ostreatus l.) in the diets for chickens: performance, mucus formation and fermentation in the caecum. Folia Veterinaria, 56, 45—46.
  12. 12. Deplancke, B., Gaskins, H. R., 2001: Microbial modulation of innate defense: goblet cells and the intestinal mucus layer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr., 73, 1131S—1141S.10.1093/ajcn/73.6.1131S
  13. 13. Dohrman, A., Miyata, S., Gallup, M., 1998: Mucin gene (MUC2 and MUC5AC upregulation by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1406, 251—259.10.1016/S0925-4439(98)00010-6
  14. 14. Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M., Mazmanian, S. K., 2016: Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 14, 20—32.10.1038/nrmicro3552483711426499895
  15. 15.https://ec.europa.eu/food/safety/animal-feed/feed-additives_en.
  16. 16. Ermund, A., Schütte, A., Johansson, M. E. V., Gustafsson, J. K., Hansson, G. C., 2013: Studies of mucus in mouse stomach, small intestine, and colon. I. Gastrointestinal mucus layers have different properties depending on location as well as over the Peyer’s patches. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., 305, G341—G347.10.1152/ajpgi.00046.2013376124723832518
  17. 17. Faixová, Z., Piešová, E., Maková, Z., Levkut, M. jr., Pistl, J., Lauková, A., et al., 2012: Effect of dietary probiotic and plant extract supplementation on mucin dynamics in the chicken intestine and on performance of chickens. Folia Veterinaria, 56 (Supplementum II), 15—16.
  18. 18. Hansson, G. C., 2012: Role of mucus layers in gut infection and inflammation. Curr. Opin. Microbiol., 15, 57—62.10.1016/j.mib.2011.11.002371645422177113
  19. 19. Hashemi, R., Davoodi, H., 2011: Herbal plant and their derivatives as growth and health promoters in animal nutrition. Veterinary Research Communications, 35, 169—180.10.1007/s11259-010-9458-221213046
  20. 20. Chen, Y. P., Cheng, Y. F., Li, X. H., Yang, W. L., Wen, C., Zhuang, S., Zhou, Y. M., 2017: Effects of threonine supplementation on the growth performance, immunity, oxidative status, intestinal integrity, and barrier function of broilers at the early age. Poultry Science, 96, 405—413.10.3382/ps/pew24027418662
  21. 21. Cho, Y., Yoon, K. J., 2014: An overview of calf diarrhea — infectious etiology, diagnosis, and intervention. J. Vet. Sci., 15, 1—17.10.4142/jvs.2014.15.1.1397375224378583
  22. 22. Jakobsson, H. E., Rodríguez-Piñeiro, A. M., Schütte, A., Ermund, A., Boysen, P., Bemark, M., et al., 2015: The composition of the gut microbiota shapes the colon mucus barrier. EMBO reports, 16, 164—177.10.15252/embr.201439263432874425525071
  23. 23. Johansson, M. E. V., Ambort, D., Pelaseyed, T., Schutte, A., Gustafsson, J. K., Ermund, A., et al., 2011a: Composition and functional role of the mucus layers in the intestine. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 68, 3635—3641.10.1007/s00018-011-0822-321947475
  24. 24. Johansson, M. E. V., Holmén-Larsson, D. B., Hansson, G. C., 2011b: The two mucus layers of colon are organized by the MUC2 mucin, whereas the outer layer is a legislator of host-microbial interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108, 4659—4665.10.1073/pnas.1006451107306360020615996
  25. 25. Johansson, M. E. V., Sjovall, H., Hansson, G. C., 2013: The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Natur. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 10, 352—361.10.1038/nrgastro.2013.35375866723478383
  26. 26. Kim, Y. S., Ho, S. B., 2010: Intestinal Goblet cells and mucins in health and disease: Recent insights and progress. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep., 12, 319—330.10.1007/s11894-010-0131-2
  27. 27. Li, H., Limenitakis, J. P., Fuhrer, T., Geuking, M. B., Lawson, M. A., Wyss, M., et al., 2015: The outer mucus layer hosts a distinct intestinal microbial niche. Nature Communications, 6, 8292.10.1038/ncomms9292
  28. 28. Licois, D., Guillo, J. F., Mouline, C., Reynaud, A., 1992: Susceptibility of the rabbit to an enteropathogenic strain of Escherichia coli 0103: effect of animals’ age. Ann. Rech. Vet., 23, 225—232.
  29. 29. Lin, A., 2010:Characterization of Murine Intestinal Mucus Layer Gene Expression During Postnatal Maturation (Thesis), University of Toronto, 101 pp.
  30. 30. Loeffler, S. L., 2014: Effects of Probiotic and Prebiotic Supplementation in Turkey Poults on Intestinal Morphology and MUC2 Gene Expression (Thesis), The Ohio State University, 50 pp.
  31. 31. Macfarlane, S., Macfarlane, G. T., 2006: Composition and metabolic activities of bacterial biofilms colonizing food residues in the human gut. App. Environ. Microbiol., 72, 6204—6211.10.1128/AEM.00754-06
  32. 32. Mah, T. F. C., O’Toole, G. A., 2001: Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends in Microbiology, 9, 34—39.10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2
  33. 33. Major, P., Revajová, V., Levkut, M., Ševčíková, Z., Spišáková, V., Faixová, Z., et al., 2011: Intestinal mucin dynamic and leukocytic responses of chickens infected with Eimeria acervulina and fed oregano supplemented diet. Acta Vet. Brno, 80, 147—156.10.2754/avb201180020147
  34. 34. Maková, Z., Piešová, E., Faixová, Z., Levkut, M. jr, Lauková, A., Pistl, J., 2009: The effect of S. enteritidis PT4 and E. faecium EF55 on chicken intestine mucus production and some haematological parameters. Folia Veterinaria, 53, 162—164.
  35. 35. Mattar, A. F., Teitelbaum, D. H., Drongowski, R. A., Yongyi, F., Harmon, C. M., Coran, A. G., 2002: Probiotics up-regulate MUC-2 mucin gene expression in a Caco-2 cell-culture model. Pediatr. Surg. Int., 18, 586—90.10.1007/s00383-002-0855-7
  36. 36. Mack, D. R., Michail, S., Wei, S., McDougall, L., 1999: Probiotics inhibit enteropathogenic E. coli adherence in vitro by including intestinal mucin gene expression. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol., 276, 39—44.10.1152/ajpgi.1999.276.4.G941
  37. 37. Moghaddam, H. S., Moghaddam, H. N., Kermanshahi, H., Mosavi, A. H., Raji, A., 2011: The effect of threonine on mucin 2 gene expression, intestinal histology and performance of broiler chicken. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 10, e14.10.4081/ijas.2011.e14
  38. 38. Montagne, L., Pluske, J. R., Hampson, D. J., 2003: A review of interactions between dietary fibre and the intestinal mucosa, and their consequences on digestive health in young nonruminant animals. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 108, 95—117.10.1016/S0377-8401(03)00163-9
  39. 39. Oh, N. S., Lee, J. Y., Lee, J. M., Lee, K. W., Kim, Y., 2017: Mulberry leaf extract fermented with Lactobacillus acidophilus A4 ameliorates 5-fluorouracil-induced intestinal mucositis in rats. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 64, 459—468.10.1111/lam.1274128378512
  40. 40. Sangani, A. K., Masoudi, A. A., Hosseini, S. A., 2014: The effects of herbal plants on Mucin 2 gene expression and performance in ascetic broilers. Iranian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 8, 47—52.
  41. 41. Smirnov, A., Tako, E., Ferket, P. R., Uni, Z., 2006: Mucin gene expression and mucin content in the chicken intestinal goblet cells are affected by in ovo feeding of carbohydrates. Poult. Sci. J., 85, 669—673.10.1093/ps/85.4.66916615351
  42. 42. Sørensen, M. T., Vestergaard, E. M., Jensen, S. K., Lauridsen, C., Højsgaard, S., 2009: Performance and diarrhoea in piglets following weaning at seven weeks of age: Challenge with E. coli O 149 and effect of dietary factors. Livestock Science, 123, 314—321.10.1016/j.livsci.2008.12.001
  43. 43. Strompfová, V., Lauková A., 2007:In vitro study on bacteriocin production of Enterococci associated with chickens. Anaerobe, 13, 228—237.10.1016/j.anaerobe.2007.07.00217884622
  44. 44. Ševčíková, Z., Blanár, J., Lauková, A., Revajová, V., Strompfová, V., Levkut, M., 2016: Effect of Enterococcus faecium EF 55 on morphometry and proliferative activity of intestinal mucosa in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis. J. Vet. Res., 60, 261—265.10.1515/jvetres-2016-0040
  45. 45. Van den Steen, P., Rudd, P. M., Dwek, R. A., Opdenakker, G., 1998: Concepts and Principles of O-Linked Glycosylation. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 33, 151—208.10.1080/104092398912041989673446
  46. 46. Wang, L., Cao, H., Liu, L., Wang, B., Walker, W. A., Acra, S. A., Yan, F., 2014: Activation of epidermal growth factor receptor mediates mucin production stimulated by p40, and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG-derived protein. J. Biol. Chem., 289, 20234—20244.10.1074/jbc.M114.553800410633924895124
  47. 47. Wilson, M., 2002: Bacterial adhesion to host tissues: mechanisms and consequences. Adv. Mol. Cell. Microb., 1, 1—39.10.1017/CBO9780511541575
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fv-2018-0037 | Journal eISSN: 2453-7837 | Journal ISSN: 0015-5748
Language: English
Page range: 48 - 55
Submitted on: Nov 5, 2018
Accepted on: Dec 6, 2018
Published on: Dec 31, 2018
Published by: The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2018 R. Szabóová, Z. Faixová, Z. Maková, E. Piešová, published by The University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Košice
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.