Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Fabric Attractiveness Using Four Sensory Evaluators Cover

Fabric Attractiveness Using Four Sensory Evaluators

Open Access
|Dec 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Research framework
Research framework

Fig. 2.

Color samples with accompanying information
Color samples with accompanying information

Fig. 3.

Texture samples with accompanying information
Texture samples with accompanying information

Fig. 4.

Essential oils and liquids dripped onto textiles
Essential oils and liquids dripped onto textiles

Fig. 5.

Experimental setup
Experimental setup

Fig. 6.

Five clusters of ratings of sample color
Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Int = ratings for the interesting-boring semantic differential. 1 = Black. 2 = Sulphur Spring. 3 = Caramel Café. 4 = Desert Sage. 5 = Pink Yarrow. 6 = Blazing Yellow
Five clusters of ratings of sample color Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Int = ratings for the interesting-boring semantic differential. 1 = Black. 2 = Sulphur Spring. 3 = Caramel Café. 4 = Desert Sage. 5 = Pink Yarrow. 6 = Blazing Yellow

Fig. 7.

Two clusters of texture attribute ratings
Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Sens = ratings for the insensitive-sensitive semantic differential. 1 = cloqué jacquard, 2 = knitted rib, 3 = suede leather, 4 = canvas, 5 = crochet, 6 = boiled wool
Two clusters of texture attribute ratings Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Sens = ratings for the insensitive-sensitive semantic differential. 1 = cloqué jacquard, 2 = knitted rib, 3 = suede leather, 4 = canvas, 5 = crochet, 6 = boiled wool

Fig. 8.

Six clusters of scent attribute ratings
Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Lux = ratings for the luxurious-cheap semantic differential. 1 = lemon essential oil. 2 = white tobacco e-liquid. 3 = Himalayan cedar. 4 = liquid ammonia. 5 = ether. 6 = geranium bourbon essential oil
Six clusters of scent attribute ratings Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Lux = ratings for the luxurious-cheap semantic differential. 1 = lemon essential oil. 2 = white tobacco e-liquid. 3 = Himalayan cedar. 4 = liquid ammonia. 5 = ether. 6 = geranium bourbon essential oil

Fig. 9.

Two clusters of sound attribute ratings
Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Calm = ratings for the calming-disturbing semantic differential. 1 = cloqué jacquard, 2 = knitted rib, 3 = suede leather, 4 = canvas, 5 = crochet, 6 = boiled wool
Two clusters of sound attribute ratings Note. Attr = ratings for the attractive-unattractive semantic differential. Calm = ratings for the calming-disturbing semantic differential. 1 = cloqué jacquard, 2 = knitted rib, 3 = suede leather, 4 = canvas, 5 = crochet, 6 = boiled wool

Distribution of adjectives in previous scientific articles and study areas

Semantic differentialStudy
Boring-InterestingHabyba et al. [42], Lokman et al. [43], Fischl G. [44]
Cheap-LuxuriousHabyba et al. [42], Lokman et al. [43]
Disturbing-CalmHabyba et al. [42], Lokman et al. [43], Fischl G. [44], Janssens J. [45], Evensen et al. [46],
Insensitive-SensitiveLokman et al. [43]
Unattractive-AttractiveLokman et al. [43], Santos M. [47]

Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of ratings for texture samples

Unattractive-AttractiveInsensitive-SensitiveFrequencies of choices
SampleMSDMSDMost attractiveMost unattractiveMost insensitiveMost sensitive
1 - Cloqué jacquard5.21.45.01.45408
2 - Knitted rib6.10.95.81.1240021
3 - Suede leather5.32.04.91.7185715
4 - Canvas4.01.93.91.73966
5 - Crochet3.72.03.01.9322322
6 - Boiled wool3.51.63.91.611492

Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of ratings for scented textile samples

Unattractive-AttractiveCheap-LuxuriousFrequencies of choices
SampleMSDMSDMost attractiveMost unattractiveMost luxuriousCheapest
1 - Lemon essential oil5.61.35.01.4282203
2 - White tobacco e-liquid3.51.93.21.778512
3 - Himalayan cedar2.51.62.81.849610
4 - Liquid ammonia1.91.22.31.4132217
5 - Ether4.01.93.61.710297
6 - Geranium bourbon es.oil3.61.73.71.641125

Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of ratings for audio samples

Unattractive-AttractiveDisturbing-CalmingFrequencies of choices
SampleMSDMSDMost attractiveMost unattractiveMost calmingMost disturbing
Audio recording 1 - cloqué jacquard4.41.64.41.791111
Audio recording 2 – canvas4.01.54.11.59181
Audio recording 3 – suede leather5.31.55.61.5203182
Audio recording 4 – crochet2.21.41.91.0222218
Audio recording 5 – knitted rib4.31.74.31.7142153
Audio recording 6 – boiled wool2.51.52.01.3025029

Mean values (M) and standard deviation (SD) of ratings for color samples, and the number of participants selecting a specific sample as having the highest attribute value

Unattractive-AttractiveBoring-InterestingFrequencies of choices
SampleMSDMSDMost attractiveMost unattractiveMost interestingMost boring
1 - Black4.61.83.62.158021
2 - Sulphur Spring4.31.75.31.5410114
3 - Caramel Cafe3.81.63.41.5320216
4 - Desert Sage5.31.64.71.517598
5 - Pink Yarrow5.81.46.11.0194202
6 - Blazing Yellow4.51.85.21.467123
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2023-0041 | Journal eISSN: 2300-7354 | Journal ISSN: 1230-3666
Language: English
Page range: 10 - 23
Published on: Dec 1, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: Volume open

© 2023 Duje Kodžoman, Vanja Čok, Anja Podlesek, Alenka Pavko Čuden, published by Łukasiewicz Research Network, Institute of Biopolymers and Chemical Fibres
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.