
Fig.1.
Test color samples
Table 1.
Color values of the samples
| Sample number | Sample | CIE 1976 L*a*b* | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| L* | a* | b* | ||
| 1 | Black | 29.23 | 0.17 | −1.57 |
| 2 | Gray | 46.39 | −0.36 | −3.68 |
| 3 | Light white | 64.52 | 0.67 | 1.65 |
| 4 | Black green | 31.92 | −1.94 | 3.03 |
| 5 | Dark green | 34.97 | −4.08 | 11.19 |
| 6 | Green | 43.89 | −13.27 | 18.41 |
| 7 | Yellow green | 46.16 | −3.38 | 27.62 |
| 8 | Dark brown | 42.08 | 5.37 | 15.19 |
| 9 | Red brown | 44.67 | 14.29 | 25.70 |
| 10 | Brown | 45.18 | 9.79 | 22.83 |
| 11 | Clay | 54.63 | 17.39 | 25.67 |
| 12 | Ocher | 55.49 | 13.54 | 42.32 |
Table 2.
Color reproduction accuracy with color checkers
| Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Average | Standard deviation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testing | 6.23 | 17.53 | 15.18 | 4.59 | 7.61 | 12.79 | 16.50 | 12.13 | 15.01 | 16.21 | 15.09 | 13.31 | 12.68 | 4.28 |
| Color checker | 1.01 | 8.95 | 8.32 | 3.02 | 4.78 | 7.32 | 8.09 | 7.36 | 8.37 | 6.31 | 7.21 | 6.17 | 6.41 | 2.38 |
Table 3.
Ratio of color difference reduction
| Number | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Max. | Min. | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Color checker | 83.79 | 48.94 | 45.19 | 34.20 | 37.19 | 42.77 | 50.97 | 39.32 | 44.24 | 61.07 | 52.22 | 53.64 | 83.79 | 34.20 | 49.46 |

Fig.2.
Simplified simulation of camouflages

Fig.3.
Picture taken by the digital camera at an equivalent observation distance of 10 m

Fig.4.
Observation effects from different distances
Table 4.
“Soldier” sizes and their corresponding simulation boxes from different distances
| Distance / m | 10 | 20 | 30 | 40 | 50 | 60 | 70 | 80 | 90 | 100 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Size / pixels | 185×556 | 93×278 | 62×186 | 46×139 | 37×111 | 31×93 | 27×80 | 23×70 | 21×62 | 19×56 |
| Box / pixels | 130×476 | 65×238 | 43×159 | 33×119 | 26×95 | 22×79 | 19×68 | 16×60 | 14×53 | 13×48 |

Fig.5.
Schemes designed

Fig.6.
Simulation effect of group 1 in four images of mottled woodland backgrounds
Table 5.
Degrees of feature similarities of 15 schemes
| Group | Scheme | Characteristic similarity degree | Sorted within groups | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Background a | Background b | Background c | Background d | Average | |||
| 1 | A | 0.6003 | 0.6038 | 0.7056 | 0.6045 | 0.6285 | 3 |
| B | 0.5983 | 0.6018 | 0.7008 | 0.6021 | 0.6258 | 4 | |
| C | 0.6108 | 0.6145 | 0.7247 | 0.6155 | 0.6414 | 2 | |
| D | 0.6273 | 0.6315 | 0.7529 | 0.6324 | 0.6610 | 1 | |
| E | 0.5928 | 0.5961 | 0.6914 | 0.5966 | 0.6192 | 5 | |
| 2 | F | 0.5855 | 0.5886 | 0.6770 | 0.5888 | 0.6100 | 4 |
| G | 0.5863 | 0.5894 | 0.6786 | 0.5896 | 0.6110 | 3 | |
| H | 0.6062 | 0.6099 | 0.7149 | 0.6102 | 0.6353 | 1 | |
| I | 0.5966 | 0.5999 | 0.6986 | 0.6006 | 0.6239 | 2 | |
| J | 0.5803 | 0.5833 | 0.6671 | 0.5834 | 0.6035 | 5 | |
| 3 | K | 0.5865 | 0.5897 | 0.6788 | 0.5899 | 0.6112 | 5 |
| L | 0.5956 | 0.5990 | 0.6957 | 0.5992 | 0.6224 | 3 | |
| M | 0.5963 | 0.5998 | 0.6970 | 0.6000 | 0.6233 | 2 | |
| N | 0.6182 | 0.6222 | 0.7363 | 0.6227 | 0.6498 | 1 | |
| O | 0.5871 | 0.5903 | 0.6799 | 0.5905 | 0.6119 | 4 | |
Table 6.
Degrees of feature similarities of the six optimal schemes
| Group | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scheme | C | D | H | I | M | N |
| Average characteristic similarity degree | 0.5183 | 0.5206 | 0.5210 | 0.5183 | 0.5180 | 0.5197 |
| Sorted | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 3 |

Fig.7.
Flow of scheme selection

Fig.8.
Designed pattern painting on background images for effect simulations

Fig.9.
User interface of a system constructed for the simulation and evaluation of individual digital camouflages

Fig.10.
Patterns in pictures displayed on the projection screen

Fig.11.
Simulation evaluation results
Table 7.
Comparison of results of degrees of feature similarities and simulation evaluations
| Group | Scheme | Characteristic similarity degree model | Simulation evaluation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Similarity degree | Sorted within groups | Score | Sorted within groups | ||
| 1 | A | 0.6285 | 3 | 3.3105 | 4 |
| B | 0.6258 | 4 | 3.3318 | 3 | |
| C | 0.6414 | 2 | 3.4793 | 2 | |
| D | 0.6610 | 1 | 3.5263 | 1 | |
| E | 0.6192 | 5 | 3.1132 | 5 | |
| 2 | F | 0.6100 | 4 | 3.1433 | 5 |
| G | 0.6110 | 3 | 3.2694 | 4 | |
| H | 0.6353 | 1 | 3.5639 | 1 | |
| I | 0.6239 | 2 | 3.4241 | 2 | |
| J | 0.6035 | 5 | 3.2930 | 3 | |
| 3 | K | 0.6112 | 5 | 3.2245 | 4 |
| L | 0.6224 | 3 | 3.2985 | 3 | |
| M | 0.6233 | 2 | 3.3419 | 2 | |
| N | 0.6498 | 1 | 3.4961 | 1 | |
| O | 0.6119 | 4 | 3.1932 | 5 | |