Table 1
Body shape parameters of subjects (n=3)
| Subjects | HT/(cm) | WT/(kg) | WC/(cm) | HC/(cm) | TC/(cm) | KC/e(cm) | AC/(cm) | BMI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S1 | 163.1 | 47.8 | 64.0 | 88.0 | 53.0 | 35.4 | 24.3 | 17.99 |
| S2 | 164.0 | 49.2 | 68.0 | 89.0 | 56.0 | 36.0 | 25.1 | 18.29 |
| S3 | 162.6 | 47.5 | 64.5 | 87.6 | 53.5 | 35.0 | 24.5 | 17.96 |
| Mean | 163.0 | 48.2 | 65.5 | 88.2 | 54.2 | 35.5 | 24.6 | 18.08 |
| SD | (0.6) | (0.8) | (4.75) | (0.5) | (1.7) | (0.3) | (0.2) | (0.35) |
[i] Note(s): HT-Height; WT-Weight; WC-Waist circumference; HC-Hip circumference; TC-Thigh circumference; KC-Knee circumference; AC-Ankle circumference
Table 2
Experimental compression pants
| CP1 | CP2 | CP3 | CS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabric | 85% nylon 15% spandex | 80% nylon 20% spandex | 76% nylon 24% spandex | 100%cotton |
| Knee circumference /cm | 30 | 28 | 26 | 40 |
| Applied percentage of fabric stretch/% | Wale: 63.5 Course: 76.3 | Wale: 78.1 Course: 81.6 | Wale: 84.2 Course: 86.8 | Wale: 46.3 Course: 50.5 |

Fig. 1
Dynamic capture instrument

Fig. 2
Running cycle

Fig. 3
Distribution of lower limb marker points
Table 3
Rigid body and corresponding names of the marker point
| Corresponding part | Marker point name |
|---|---|
| Hip joint | HP (hip point) |
| Knee joint (lateral and interior) | KP (knee point), KL (knee lateral), KI (knee interior), |
| Ankle (lateral and interior) | AL (ankle lateral), AI (ankle interior), |

Fig. 4
Diagram of left side of lower limb during running

Fig. 5
AKJ of different subjects with elastic pants at different speeds

Fig. 6
AKJ of different subjects with non-elastic pants at different speeds.

Fig. 7
AKJ under different fabric elasticity

Fig. 8
AKJ under different speeds

Fig. 9
Min and max AKJ of different pants at different movement speeds
Note: * shows significant difference (p < 0.05), the value of CP is significantly different from that of CS
Table 4
Influence significance of individual differences on the gait cycle
Table 5
Influence significance of individual differences on AKJ