Figure 1.
![Thuja seedlings from the nursery to the field: (i) at lifting time in the nursery (December 10, 2019), (ii) after extraction from the container showing: [a] shoots, [b] collar, [c] root plug, (iii) after outplanting in the field (July 15, 2020).](https://sciendo-parsed.s3.eu-central-1.amazonaws.com/69049771ec0c7622516602b4/j_fsmu-2024-0014_fig_001.jpg?X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Content-Sha256=UNSIGNED-PAYLOAD&X-Amz-Credential=AKIA6AP2G7AKOUXAVR44%2F20251104%2Feu-central-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Date=20251104T225105Z&X-Amz-Expires=3600&X-Amz-Signature=c0ebc42553e415837681af66d843ac1c8baae4bef9cfe9b2d74f26f416b8fbea&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&x-amz-checksum-mode=ENABLED&x-id=GetObject)
Figure 2.

Figure 3.

Figure 4.

Figure 5.

Figure 6.

Figure 7.

Figure 8.

Figure 9.

Figure 10.

Figure 11.

General morphological traits of thuja seedlings at lifting time in the nursery (n = 1734)_
| Attributes | Min | Max | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shoot height (cm) | 4.01 | 53.01 | 20.58 ±8.25 |
| Collar diameter (mm) | 1.07 | 9.11 | 3.37 ±0.78 |
| Sturdiness index | 2.26 | 10.69 | 5.92 ± 1.48 |
Logistic regression model parameters of the survival and rooting depth (cm) (n = 62) of thuja seedlings_ SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; Rd: rooting depth (cm)_
| Source | β | μ | SE | Wald’s χ2 | Pr > χ2 | OR | 95% CI for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Constant | -5.428 | 1.542 | 12.394 | <0.0001 | ||||
| Rd (cm) | 0.094 | 57.74 | 0.026 | 13.284 | <0.0001 | 1.1 | 1.045 | 1.156 |
Logistic regression model parameters of the survival and initial morphological traits of thuja seedlings: shoot height H0 (cm), collar diameter D0 (mm) and sturdiness index SI0 (cm mm−1) (n = 1734)_ SE: standard error; OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval_
| Source | β | μ | SE | Wald’s χ2 | Pr > χ2 | OR | 95% CI for OR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | |||||||
| Constant | -0.158 | 0.113 | 1.946 | 0.163 | ||||
| H0 (cm) | 0.008 | 0.005 | 2.371 | 0.124 | 1.008 | 0.998 | 1.018 | |
| Constant | -1.693 | 0.197 | 73.789 | <0.0001 | ||||
| D0 (mm) | 0.522 | 3.24 | 0.059 | 78.966 | <0.0001 | 1.685 | 1.502 | 1.891 |
| Constant | 0.475 | 0.179 | 6.991 | 0.008 | ||||
| SI0 (cm mm1) | -0.080 | 5.93 | 0.029 | 7.528 | 0.006 | 0.924 | 0.873 | 0.978 |
Correlations between different initial morphological traits of thuja seedlings_
| Regression model | n | p-value | R2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| H0= -9.507 + 8.896*D0 | 1734 | p < 0.0001 | 0.72 |
| H0 = -8.323 + 4.875*SI0 | 1734 | p < 0.0001 | 0.76 |
| SI0 = 2.608 + 0.978*D0 | 1734 | p < 0.0001 | 0.26 |
Initial morphological classes of thuja seedlings at outplanting time using the K-means method_ IMC: Initial morphological class_
| IMC | Seedling size | Centroid | Class weight | lntra-class variance | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H0 (cm) | D0 (mm) | SI0 (cm mm−1) | ||||
| A | Small | 10.8 | 2.52 | 4.35 | 513 | 6.333 |
| B | Medium | 18.25 | 3.31 | 5.57 | 460 | 5.100 |
| C | Large | 24.93 | 3.76 | 6.7 | 435 | 4.641 |
| D | Extra-large | 32.75 | 4.26 | 7.74 | 326 | 12.477 |
| Total | 1734 | |||||
Comparison of shoot height and collar diameter relative growth rates and sturdiness index variation within the initial morphological classes of thuja seedlings using the Kruskal-Wallis test with a 5% significance level_ The means are separated by the Dunn procedure_ Values followed by different letters within the same column are significantly different_ IMC: Initial morphological class_
| IMC | Obs. | RGR(H) (cm/cm/month) | RGR(D) (mm/mm/month) | Sturdiness index variation | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sl0 | Sl1 | SI1/SI0 | ||||
| A | 200 | 0.033 ± 0.017 c | 0.029 ± 0.017 a | 4.250 a | 4.449 a | 1.061 ± 0.171 c |
| B | 200 | 0.028 ± 0.018 b | 0.028 ± 0.018 a | 5.472 b | 5.442 b | 1 ± 0.147 b |
| C | 200 | 0.023 ± 0.013 ab | 0.030 ± 0.014 a | 6.696 c | 6.649 c | 0.938 ± 0.127 a |
| D | 200 | 0.02 ± 0.014 a | 0.031 ± 0.017 a | 7.393 d | 6.215 d | 0.911 ± 0.118 a |