Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Effects of waterlogging on some chemicals and antioxidant responses in Zanthoxylum armatum DC. seedlings

Forestry Studies
Volume 81 (2024): Issue 1 (December 2024)
By:
Open Access
|Oct 2025

Figures & Tables

Figure 1.

Effects of waterlogging stress on chlorophyll content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on chlorophyll content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 2.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the relative electrical conductivity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the relative electrical conductivity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 3.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the malondialdehyde (MDA) content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the malondialdehyde (MDA) content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 4.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the soluble sugar content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the soluble sugar content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 5.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the soluble protein content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the soluble protein content of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 6.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the peroxidase (SOD) activity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the peroxidase (SOD) activity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.

Figure 7.

Effects of waterlogging stress on the superoxide dismutase (POD) activity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
Effects of waterlogging stress on the superoxide dismutase (POD) activity of Z. armatum leaves. The vertical bars represent the standard errors, n = 3. Bars followed by different letter(s) are statistically significant at p < 0.05. CK: Seedlings were not flooded. A: Seedlings were flooded at 2.7 cm above the ground level. B: Seedlings were flooded at 5.5 cm above the ground level. C: Seedlings were flooded at 11 cm above the ground level.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2024-0010 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 11 - 21
Published on: Oct 30, 2025
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
waterlogging stress,
physiological responses,
ROS-scavenging enzymes,
defensive mechanism
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2025 Xiao-ying Ning, Pan Zhang, Tao Gu, Ya-juan Wang, Meng-ying Wang, Shun Gao, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 81 (2024): Issue 1 (December 2024)Next article