j_fsmu-2023-0016_tab_003
| 1. Basic characteristics |
| 1.1 Reasons for choosing forest leasing among different business models |
| 1.2 Setting up reasons |
| 1.3 Organizational structure |
| 1.4 Service provision for private forest owners |
| 1.5 Problems |
| 1.6 Forest owners’ characteristics |
| 1.7 Possibilities for expanding the business model |
| 1.8 Forest owners’ involvement in forest management |
| 2. Opinion about business cooperation (forest leasing) |
| 2.1 Contribution to forest owners’ wishes |
| 2.2 Prevalence of forest leasing |
| 2.3 Interest of different stakeholders (SFS, state, forest owners, timber purchasers) |
| 2.4 Operational environment |
| 2.5 Problems of operational environment |
| 2.6 Prepositions for future development |
| 3. Forest leasing and wood mobilization |
| 3.1 Contribution to wood mobilization |
| 3.2 Facilitating factors |
| 3.3 Hindering factors |
| 3.4 Contribution to climate change |
| 3.5 Contribution to wood mobilization |
| 4. Other |
Challenges in forest lease_
| Challenges for tenants | Challenges for PFOs |
|---|---|
| Possible conflicts with PFOs | Possible conflicts with tenants |
| Lack of trust in tenants because of previous bad experience | Lack of trust in tenants because of previous bad experience |
| Insufficient operational environment – establishing contact with PFOs | |
| Insufficient operational environment – lack of information about business cooperation | |
| High financial and human investment required |
Benefits from forest lease_
| Benefits for tenants | Benefits for PFOs |
|---|---|
| New employment opportunities | Income from forests |
| Long-term contracts and guaranteed income | Direct communication and no middlemen could provide financial benefits for PFO |
| Shared responsibility | Emotional satisfaction |
| Enables forest management for absent PFOs (they live abroad or far away from their forest) | |
| Enables forest management in co-owned forests | |
| Shared responsibility |