Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Validation of saw log and technological wood assortment recovery and reduction predictions based on cut-to-length harvester data Cover

Validation of saw log and technological wood assortment recovery and reduction predictions based on cut-to-length harvester data

By: Allar Padari and  Ahto Kangur  
Open Access
|Apr 2024

References

  1. Adermann, V., Padari, A., Sirgmets, R., Kosk, A., Kaimre, P. 2015. Valuation of timber production and carbon sequestration on Järvselja nature protection area. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 63, 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/fsmu-2015-0007.
  2. Bravo, F., Fabrika, M., Ammer, C., Barreiro, S., Bielak, K., Coll, L., Fonseca, T., Kangur, A., Löf, M., Merganičová, K., Pach, M., Pretzsch, H., Stojanović, D., Schuler, L., Peric, S., Rötzer, T., del Río, M., Dodan, M., Bravo-Oviedo, A. 2019. Modelling approaches for mixed forests dynamics prognosis. Research gaps and opportunities. – Forest Systems, 28(1), p.eR002. https://doi.org/10.5424/fs/2019281-14342.
  3. Eastaugh, C.S., Kangur, A., Korjus, H., Kiviste, A., Zlatanov, T., Velichkov, I., Srdjevic, B., Srdjevic, Z., Hasenauer, H. 2013. Scaling issues and constraints in modelling of forest ecosystems: A review with special focus on user needs. – Baltic Forestry, 19(2), 316–330.
  4. Kaivapalu, R. 2017. The comparison of clearcut machinery based on the example of the State Forest Management Centre. – Bachelor’s thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 31 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).
  5. Kangur, A., Sims, A., Jõgiste, K., Kiviste, A., Korjus, H., von Gadow, K. 2007. Comparative modeling of stand development in Scots pine dominated forests in Estonia. – Forest Ecology and Management, 250, 109–118.
  6. Kankare, V., Vauhkonen, J., Tanhuanpää, T., Holopainen, M., Vastaranta, M., Joensuu, M., Krooks, A., Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H., Alho, P., Viitala, R. 2014. Accuracy in estimation of timber assortments and stem distribution – A comparison of airborne and terrestrial laser scanning techniques. – ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 97, 89–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.08.008.
  7. Kask, Ü., Loosaar, J., Parve, T., Kask, L., Paist, A., Muiste, P., Padari, A., Astover, A. 2011. Potential of biomass in Narva region regarding oil shale and biomass co-firing. – Oil Shale, 28, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.3176/oil.2011.1S.10.
  8. Kinnisasja erakorralise hindamise kord. 2023. The procedure of extraordinary evaluation of immovable property. RT I, 15.03.2023, 15. (In Estonian).
  9. Kiviste, A., Álvarez González, J.G., Rojo Alboreca, A., Ruiz González, A.D. 2002. Growth functions application in the forestry field. (Funciones de crecimiento de aplicación en el ámbito forestall). Madrid, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Tecnología Agraria Alimentaria (INIA). 190 pp. (In Spanish).
  10. Malinen, J., Kilpeläinen, H., Piira, T., Redsven, V., Wall, T., Nuutinen, T. 2007. Comparing model-based approaches with bucking simulation-based approach in the prediction of timber assortment recovery. – Forestry, 80, 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpm012.
  11. Malinen, J., Kilpeläinen, H., Verkasalo, E. 2018. Validating the predicted saw log and pulpwood proportions and gross value of Scots pine and Norway spruce harvest at stand level by Most Similar Neighbour analyses and a stem quality database. – Silva Fennica, 52(4). https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.9972.
  12. Malinen, J., Piira, T., Kilpeläinen, H., Wall, T., Verkasalo, E. 2010. Timber assortment recovery models for southern Finland. – Baltic Forestry, 16, 102–112.
  13. Metsa korraldamise juhend. 2009. Forest Inventory Act. – RT I, 13.07.2023, 33. (In Estonian).
  14. Nyyssonen, A., Ojansuu, R. 1982. Assessment of timber assortments, value and value increment of tree stands. – Acta Forestalia Fennica, 179.
  15. Ozolinš, R. 2002. Forest stand assortment structure analysis using mathematical modelling. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, XXXVII, 33–42.
  16. Padari, A. 1999. About the assortment of the growing forest. Assortments and defects. (Kasvava metsa hindamisest. Sortimendid ja rikked). EPMÜ Metsandusteaduskonna Toimetised, 32, 37–43. (In Estonian).
  17. Padari, A. 2020. Mathematical analysis and modification possibilities of Ozolinš’ taper curve on the example of Hiiumaa pines. – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 72, 34–53. https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0004.
  18. Padari, A., Muiste, P. 2003. Analysis of maturity ages of Estonian forests. – Baltic Forestry, 9, 16–19.
  19. Padari, A., Muiste, P., Mitt, R., Pärn, L. 2009. Estimation of Estonian wood fuel resources. – Baltic Forestry, 15, 77–85.
  20. Pelissari, A.L., Roveda, M., Caldeira, S.F., Sanquetta, C.R., Corte, A.P.D., Rodrigues, C.K. 2017. Geostatistical modeling of timber volume spatial variability for Tectona grandis L.f. precision forestry. – Cerne, 23, 115–122. https://doi.org/10.1590/01047760201723012291.
  21. Prodan, M. 1965. Wood Measuring Gauge. (Holzmesslehre). Frankfurt, Sauerlander. 644 pp. (In German).
  22. Puumalainen, J. 1998. Optimal cross-cutting and sensitivity analysis for various log dimension constraints by using dynamic programming approach. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 13, 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589809382964.
  23. Sanquetta, C.R., Piva, L.R.O., Wojciechowski, J., Corte, A.P.D., Schikowski, A.B. 2018. Volume estimation of Cryptomeria japonica logs in southern Brazil using artificial intelligence models. – Southern Forests: a Journal of Forest Science, 80, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.2989/20702620.2016.1263013.
  24. Siipilehto, J., Rajala, M. 2019. Model for diameter distribution from assortments volumes: Theoretical formulation and a case application with a sample of timber trade data for clear-cut sections. – Silva Fennica, 53. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10062.
  25. Silava. 1988. Forest mensuration norms for Latvian SSR. (Нормативы для таксаций леса Латвийской ССР). Riga, Silava. 176 pp. (In Russian).
  26. Sirgmets, R., Kaimre, P., Padari, A. 2012. Forest sector impacts from the increased use of wood in energy production in Estonia. – Baltic Forestry, 18, 125–132.
  27. Sirgmets, R., Kaimre, P., Padari, A. 2011. Economic impact of enlarging the area of protected forests in Estonia. – Forest Policy and Economics, 13, 155–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.11.006.
  28. Tullus, A., Lukason, O., Vares, A., Padari, A., Lutter, R., Tullus, T., Karoles, K., Tullus, H. 2012. Economics of hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) and silver birch (Betula pendula Roth.) plantations on abandoned agricultural lands in Estonia. – Baltic Forestry, 18, 288–298.
  29. Vastaranta, M., Saarinen, N., Kankare, V., Holopainen, M., Kaartinen, H., Hyyppä, J., Hyyppä, H. 2014. Multisource single-tree inventory in the prediction of tree quality variables and logging recoveries. – Remote Sensing, 6, 3475–3491. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6043475.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2023-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 66 - 89
Published on: Apr 13, 2024
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2024 Allar Padari, Ahto Kangur, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.