Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Turberaied ja nende ökonoomiline hindamine pohla kasvukohatüübi männiku näitel Cover

Turberaied ja nende ökonoomiline hindamine pohla kasvukohatüübi männiku näitel

Open Access
|Feb 2023

References

  1. Etverk, I. 2007. A Short Forestry Course. (Väike metsanduskursus). Tartu, Eesti Loodusfoto. 55 pp. (In Estonian).
  2. Hånell, B., Nordfjell, T., Eliasson, L. 2000. Productivity and costs in shelterwood harvesting. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 15(5), 561–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/028275800750173537.
  3. Hanewinkel, M. 2002. Comparative economic investigations of even-aged and uneven-aged silvicultural systems: a critical analysis of different methods. – Forestry, 75(4), 473–481.
  4. Hazard-Daniel, S.W., Hiesl, P., Loeb, S.C., Straka, T.J. 2017. An incremental economic analysis of establishing early successional habitat for biodiversity. – Resources, 6(4), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6040053.
  5. Hynynen, J., Ahtikoski, A., Siitonen, J., Sievänen, R., Liski, J. 2005. Applying the MOTTI simulator to analyse the effects of alternative management schedules on timber and non-timber production. – Forest Ecology and Management, 207(1–2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.015.
  6. Keskkonnaagentuur. 2021. Yearbook Forest 2019. (Aastaraamat Mets 2019). Estonian Environment Agency. [WWW document]. – URL https://keskkonnaagentuur.ee/media/882/download. [Accessed 4 April 2022].
  7. Keskkonnaministeerium. 2019. Identification of the issues in the field of ecology for the initiation of the Forestry Development Plan 2030. (MAK 2030 algatamise ökoloogia valdkonna alamtöörühma probleemide kaardistus). Tallinn, Keskonnaministerium. 68 pp. (In Estonian).
  8. Keskkonnaministeerium. 2021. Estonian forestry development programme until 2030. Draft 08.12.2021. (Eesti metsanduse arengukava aastani 2030. Kavand seisuga 08.12.2021). [WWW document]. – URL https://envir.ee/media/4935/download. [Accessed 28 March 2022]. (In Estonian).
  9. Kiviste, A. 1997. Difference equations of stand height, diameeter and volume depending on stand age and site factors for Estonian state forests (on the basis of 1984–1993 forest inventory data). (Eesti riigimetsa puistute kõrguse, diameetri ja tagavara vanuseridade diferentsmudel 1984–1993. aasta metsakorralduse takseerikirjelduste andmeil). – EPMÜ teadustööde kogumik / Transactions of the Estonian Agricultural University, 189, 63–75. (In Estonian).
  10. Kõresaar, P. 2000. The dune pine forest natural regeneration in Surju Forest. (Luitemännikute looduslikust uuenemisest Surju metskonnas). – Kursusetöö. Tartu, Eesti Põllumajandusülikooli metsandusteaduskond. 59 pp. (In Estonian).
  11. Laas, E., Väät, T. 2004. Shelterwood system in Scots pine stands and pine regeneration under shelterwood. (Turberaied männikutes ja männiuuenduse tekkimine turberaiealadel). – Forestry Studies / Metsanduslikud Uurimused, 41, 86–100. (In Estonian with English summary).
  12. Metsa majandamise eeskiri. 2021. Rules of Forest Management. – Riigi Teataja I, 06.04.2021, 8. (In Estonian).
  13. Metsaseadus. 1998. Forest Act. – Riigi Teataja I, 113, 1872. (In Estonian).
  14. Metsaseadus. 2006. Forest Act. – Riigi Teataja I, 30, 232. (In Estonian).
  15. Metsaseadus. 2020. Forest Act. – Riigi Teataja I, 10.07.2020, 75. (In Estonian).
  16. Örd, A. 1977. Scots pine regeneration with shelterwood cuttings. (Männi uuendamine aegjärksete raietega). – Etverk, I. (ed.). Metsamajandus. Tallinn, Valgus, 15–22. (In Estonian).
  17. Örd, A. 2000. Protection Forests and their Management in Estonia. (Kaitsemetsad ja nende majandamine Eestis). Tallinn, Keskkonnaministeerium. 234 pp. (In Estonian).
  18. Padari, A. 2017. Creating an updated assortment model. (Uuendatud sortimenteerimise mudeli koostamine). Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 26 pp. (In Estonian).
  19. Pommerening, A., Murphy, S.T. 2004. A review of the history, definitions and methods of continuous cover forestry with special attention to afforestation and restocking. – Forestry, 77(1), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/77.1.27.
  20. Pretzsch, H., Biber, P., Ďurský, J. 2002. The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: construction, application and evaluation. – Forest Ecology and Management, 162(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00047-6.
  21. Reventlow, D.O.J., Nord-Larsen, T., Biber, P., Hilmers, T., Pretzsch, H. 2021. Simulating conversion of even-aged Norway spruce into uneven-aged mixed forest: effects of different scenarios on production, economy and heterogeneity. – European Journal of Forest Research, 140, 1005–1027. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-021-01381-0.
  22. Rist, E. 2017. Shelterwood regeneration methods in Uulu-Rannametsa pine forests. (Turberaied Uulu-Rannametsa luitemännikutes). – Master thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 60 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).
  23. Rosenvald, R., Rosenvald, K., Kaart, T., Soolmann, E. 2020. Effects of stand parameters on conifer regeneration success in pine shelterwood stands in Estonia. – European Journal of Forest Research, 139, 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-019-01255-6.
  24. Soolmann, E. 2014. Factors affecting the natural regeneration under uniform shelterwood cuttings system. (Aegjärksel raiel loodusliku uuenduse teket mõjutavad tegurid). – Master thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 61 pp. (In Estonian with English summary).
  25. Strand, M., Löfvenius, M.O., Bergsten, U., Lundmark, T., Rosvall, O. 2006. Height growth of planted conifer seedlings in relation to solar radiation and position in Scots pine shelterwood. – Forest Ecology and Managment, 224(3), 258–265.
  26. Tahvonen, O. 2007. Optimal choice between even- and uneven-aged forest management systems. – Natural Resource Modelling, 22(2), 289–321.
  27. Tishler, M. 2020. The forest may not regenerate enough well after shelterwood cutting. (Turberaiel ei pruugi mets uueneda piisavalt hästi). – Eesti Mets, 1, 30–33. (In Estonian).
  28. Tishler, M., Tullus, T., Tullus, A., Jäärats, A., Lutter, R., Lundmark, T., Tullus, H. 2020. Effects of shelterwood method and plant stock type on the early growth and survival of pine seedlings in regeneration stands under hemiboreal conditions. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 35(1–2), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1707273.
  29. Tullus, H. 2014. Ecological-economical analysis of shelterwood regeneration method and establishment of the network of demonstration-experimental areas. (Turberaiete ökoloogilis-majanduslik analüüs ja näidiskatsealade võrgustiku rajamine). – RMK Research Project Report. 11 pp. [WWW document]. – URL http://files.voog.com/0000/0004/9218/files/Rakendusuuringu_lopparuanne_turberaie.pdf. [Accessed 11 March 2022]. (In Estonian).
  30. Valgepea, M., Raudsaar, M., Karu, H., Suursild, E., Pärt, E., Sims, A., Kauer, K., Astover, A., Maasik, M., Vaasa, A., Kaimre, P. 2021. Analysis of the carbon sequestration capacity of land use, land-use change and forestry sector up to 2050. (Maakasutuse, maakasutuse muutuse ja metsanduse sektori sidumisvõimekuse analüüs kuni aastani 2050). Tartu, Keskkonnaagentuur, Eesti Maaülikool. 164 pp. https://doi.org/10.15159/eds.rep.21.01. (In Estonian).
  31. Valkonen, S., Ruuska, J., Siipilehto, J. 2002. Effect of retained trees on the development of young Scots pine stands in Southern Finland. – Forest Ecology and Managment, 166(1–3), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00668-5.
  32. Zdors, L., Donis, J. 2017. Evaluating the edge effect on the initial survival and growth of Scots pine and Norway spruce after planting in different size gaps in shelterwood. – Baltic Forestry, 23(2), 534–543.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2022-0005 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 89
Submitted on: May 27, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 30, 2022
Published on: Feb 20, 2023
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2023 Paavo Kaimre, Vivika Kängsepp, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.