Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
The IPA results of the community development variable (Y1)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community development (Y1) | Human development (Y11) | 42.20 | 51.75 |
| Business Building (Y12) | 45.20 | 52.63 | |
| Building the Environment (Y13) | 42.40 | 55.25 | |
| Building Institutions (Y14) | 41.40 | 48.88 |
The IPA results of the actor-network variable (X7)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actor-network(X7) | Actor participation (X71) | 43.10 | 45.25 |
| Actor's perspective (X72) | 64.50 | 57.75 | |
| Actor accessibility (X73) | 51.70 | 54.13 | |
| Determination of action (X74) | 41.10 | 54.75 |
The IPA results of stakeholder collaboration variable (X8)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stakeholder Collaboration (X8) | Networked structure (X81) | 68.10 | 66.88 |
| Commitment to a common purpose (X82) | 57.20 | 60.25 | |
| Trust among the participants (X83) | 41.70 | 64.13 | |
| Governance (X84) | 52.70 | 49.50 | |
| Access to authority (X85) | 64.60 | 58.50 | |
| Distributive accountability/responsibility (X86) | 51.40 | 58.25 | |
| Information sharing (X87) | 57.10 | 49.75 | |
| Access to resources (X88) | 69.60 | 65.25 |
The IPA results of the disposition variable (X3)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Disposition (X3) | Disposition effects (X31) | 59.40 | 59.00 |
| Staffing the bureaucracy (X32) | 44.60 | 72.75 | |
| Incentive (X33) | 68.90 | 54.13 |
The IPA results of the successful implementation of forest management policy variable (Y2)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policy (Y2) | Communication (Y21) | 40.90 | 36.63 |
| Resources (Y22) | 65.60 | 58.63 | |
| Disposition (Y23) | 47.50 | 64.38 | |
| Bureaucratic structure (Y24) | 67.10 | 72.75 |
Research hypothesis testing_
| Structural Model | Coefficient | Std Error | Critical Ratio (CR) | P-value | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct Effect | ||||||
| Communication | Community development | 0.325 | 0.086 | 3.779 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Resource | Community development | 0.240 | 0.093 | 2.581 | 0.010 | Significant |
| Disposition | Community development | 0.064 | 0.085 | 0.753 | 0.451 | Not Significant |
| Organizational structure | Community development | 0.060 | 0.073 | 0.822 | 0.411 | Not Significant |
| Environmental conditions | Community development | 0.336 | 0.093 | 3.613 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Relations between Organizations | Community development | 0.336 | 0.072 | 4.667 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Community development | Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policies | 0.326 | 0.082 | 3.976 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Moderation Effect Actor-Network | ||||||
| Structural Model | Coefficient | Std Error | CR | P-value | Remark | |
| Communication | Community development | 0.339 | 0.079 | 4.291 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Resource | Community development | 0.226 | 0.070 | 3.229 | 0.001 | Significant |
| Disposition | Community development | 0.092 | 0.087 | 1.057 | 0.290 | Not Significant |
| Organizational structure | Community development | 0.142 | 0.093 | 1.527 | 0.127 | Not Significant |
| Environmental conditions | Community development | 0.120 | 0.072 | 1.667 | 0.096 | Not Significant |
| Relations between Organizations | Community development | 0.356 | 0.098 | 3.633 | 0.000 | Significant |
| Moderation Effect Stakeholder Collaborations | ||||||
| Structural Model | Coefficient | Std Error | CR | P-value | Remark | |
| Community development | Successful Implementation of Forest Management Policies | 0.292 | 0.077 | 3.792 | 0.000 | Significant |
The IPA results of the organizational structure variable (X4)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organizational structure(X4) | Standard operating procedures (X41) | 57.30 | 58.38 |
| Fragmentation (X42) | 68.00 | 58.50 |
The IPA results of the communication variable (X1)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Communication (X1) | Transmission (X11) | 59.20 | 58.50 |
| Clarity (X12) | 40.10 | 48.38 | |
| Consistency (X13) | 69.60 | 65.25 |
The IPA results of environmental condition variables (X5)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Environmental conditions (X5) | Physical (X51) | 53.60 | 37.75 |
| Flora and fauna (X52) | 55.40 | 52.88 |
The IPA results of the resources variable (X2)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Resource (X2) | Member (X21) | 52.30 | 55.25 |
| Information (X22) | 62.60 | 52.63 | |
| Authority (X23) | 63.20 | 57.75 | |
| Amenities (X24) | 55.90 | 58.00 |
The IPA results of the relationship between organizations variable (X6)_
| Variable | Indicator | Importance | Performance |
|---|---|---|---|
| Relations between organizations (X6) | Organizational culture (X61) | 46.40 | 53.38 |
| Leadership (X62) | 51.60 | 48.13 | |
| Work motivation (X63) | 61.10 | 72.50 |