Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity in Czech populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.)

Open Access
|Mar 2021

References

  1. Asuka, Y., Tani, N., Tsumura, Y., Tomaru, N. 2004. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for Fagus crenata Blume. – Molecular Ecology Notes, 4, 101–103. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00583.x.
  2. Božič, G., Kutnar, L. 2012. Genetic variability of two Fagus sylvatica (L.) populations in the South-Western edge of the Panonnian plain. – Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 8, 75–86
  3. Buiteveld, J., Vendramin, G.G., Leonardi, S., Kamer, K., Geburek, T. 2007. Genetic diversity and differentiation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands varying in management history. – Forest Ecology and Management, 247, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.04.018.
  4. Comps, B., Thiebaut, B., Sugar, I., Trinajstic, I., Plazibat, M. 1991. Genetic variation of the Croatian beech stands (Fagus sylvatica L.): spatial differentiation in connection with the environment. – Annals of Forest Science, 48, 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:19910102.
  5. Cvrčková, H., Máchová, P., Poláková, L., Trčková, O. 2017. Evaluation of the genetic diversity of selected Fagus sylvatica L. populations in the Czech Republic using nuclear microsatellites. – Journal of Forest Science, 2, 53–61. https://doi.org/10.17221/88/2016-JFS.
  6. Degen, B., Scholz, F. 1998. Spatial genetic differentiation among populations of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in western Germany as identified by geostatistical analysis. – Forest Genetics, 5, 191–199.
  7. Dittmar, C., Zech, W., Elling, W. 2003. Growth variations of Common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) under different climatic and environmental conditions in Europe - A dendroecological study. – Forest Ecology and Management, 173, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00816-7.
  8. Dounavi, A., Netzer, F., Celepirovic, N., Ivanković, M., Burger, J., Figueroa, A.G., Schön, S., Simon, J., Cremer, E., Fussi, B., Konnert, M., Rennenberg, H. 2016. Genetic and physiological differences of European beech provenances (F. sylvatica L.) exposed to drought stress. – Forest Ecology and Management, 361, 226–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.11.014.
  9. Fulín, M., Čáp, J., Cvrčková, H., Novotný, P., Máchová, P., Dostál, J., Frýdl, J. 2016. Genetic characterization of important regional beech populations in the Czech Republic. (Genetická charakterizace významných regionálních populací buku lesního v České republice). – Specialized map with extended content. Strnady, VÚLHM. 52 p. (In Czech).
  10. Gömöry, D., Ditmarová, L., Hrivnák, M., Jamnická, G., Kmet, J., Krajmerova, D., Kurjak, D. 2015. Differentiation in phenological and physiological traits in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – European Journal of Forest Research, 134, 1075–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-015-0910-2.
  11. Hartl, D.L., Clark, A.G. 2007. Principles of Population Genetics. 4th Edition. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates. 652 pp.
  12. Hasenkamp, N., Ziegenhagen, B., Mengel, C., Schulze, L., Schmitt, H.-P., Liepelt, S. 2011. Towards a DNA marker assisted seed source identification: A pilot study in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – European Journal of Forest Research, 130, 513–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-010-0439-3.
  13. Janković, I.K., Nonić, M., Devetaković, J., Ivetić, V., Šijačić-Nikolić, M., Aleksić, J.M. 2019. Technical overview of nuclear microsatellites for Fagus sp., and their utility in F. sylvatica from the central Balkans (Serbia). – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 34, 545–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1623305.
  14. Jump, A.S., Hunt, J.M., Martínez-Izquierdo, J.A., Peñuelas, J. 2006a. Natural selection and climate change: Temperature-linked spatial and temporal trends in gene frequency in Fagus sylvatica. – Molecular Ecology, 15, 3469–3480. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03027.x.
  15. Jump, A.S., Hunt, J.M., Peñuelas, J. 2006b. Rapid climate change-related growth decline at the southern range edge of Fagus sylvatica. – Global Change Biology, 12, 2163–2174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01250.x.
  16. Kalinowski, S.T., Taper, M.L., Marshall, T.C. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. – Molecular Ecology, 16, 1099–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x.
  17. Kempf, M., Konnert, M. 2016. Distribution of genetic diversity in Fagus sylvatica at the north-eastern edge of the natural range. – Silva Fennica, 50, article ID 1663. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1663.
  18. Lefèvre, S., Wagner, S., Petit, R.J., De Lafontaine, G. 2012. Multiplexed microsatellite markers for genetic studies of beech. – Molecular Ecology Resources, 12, 484–491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03094.x.
  19. Leuschner, C., Meier, I.C., Hertel, D. 2006. On the niche breadth of Fagus sylvatica: soil nutrient status in 50 Central European beech stands on a broad range of bedrock types. – Annals of Forest Science, 63, 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006016.
  20. Magri, D., Vendramin, G.G., Comps, B., Dupanloup, I., Geburek, T., Gömöry, D., Latałowa, M., Litt, T., Paule, L., Roure, J.M., Tantau, I., van der Knaap, W.O., Petit, R.J., de Beaulieu J.-L. 2006. A new scenario for the Quaternary history of European beech populations: palaeobotanical evidence and genetic consequences. – New Phytologist, 171, 199–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01740.x.
  21. Ministry of Agriculture. 2019. Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. – Report on forest management of the Czech Republic in 2018. (Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2018). Prague, Ministerstvo Zemědělství ČR. 111 pp. (In Czech).
  22. Nei, M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. – The American Naturalist, 106, 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1086/282771.
  23. Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York, Columbia University Press. 514 pp.
  24. Pastorelli, R., Smulders, M.J.M., Westende, W.P.C., Vosman, B., Giannini, R., Vettori, C., Vendramin, G.G. 2003. Characterization of microsatellite markers in Fagus sylvatica L. and Fagus orientalis Lipsky. – Molecular Ecology Notes, 3, 76–78. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00355.x.
  25. Paule, L. 1997. Gene conservation in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – Bocconea, 7, 367–381.
  26. Peakall, R., Smouse, P.E. 2006. GenALEx 6: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. – Molecular Ecology Notes, 6, 288–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01155.x.
  27. Peakall R., Smouse, P.E. 2012. GenALEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research - an update. – Bioinformatics, 28, 2537–2539. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts460.
  28. Piotti, A., Leonardi, S., Buiteveld, J., Geburek, T., Gerber, S., Kramer, K., Vettori, C., Vendramin, G.G. 2012. Comparison of pollen gene flow among four European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) populations characterized by different management regimes. – Heredity, 108, 322–331.
  29. Pluess, A.R., Määttänen, K. 2013. Characterization of eighteen novel microsatellite markers and multiplex PCR protocol for Fagus sylvatica. – Conservation Genetics Resources, 5, 311–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-012-9791-6.
  30. Scalfi, M., Troggio, M., Piovani, P., Leonardi, S., Magnaschi, G., Vendramin, G.G., Menozzi, P. 2004. A RAPD, AFLP and SSR linkage map, and QTL analysis in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 108, 433–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-003-1461-3.
  31. Seifert, S., Vornam, B., Finkeldey, R. 2012. DNA sequence variation and development of SNP markers in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – European Journal of Forest Research, 131, 1761–1770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-012-0630-9.
  32. Sjölund, M.J., Jump, A.S. 2015. Coppice management of forests impacts spatial genetic structure but not genetic diversity in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – Forest Ecology and Management, 336, 65–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.015.
  33. Tanaka, K., Tsumura, Y., Nakamura, T. 1999. Development and polymorphism of microsatellite markers for Fagus crenata and the closely related species, F. japonica. – Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 99, 11–15.
  34. Thiebaut, B., Lumaret, R., Vernet, P. 1982. The bud enzymes of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) genetic distinction and analysis of polymorphism in several French populations. – Silvae Genetica, 31, 51–60.
  35. Tomášková, I. 2004. Evaluation of changes in the tree species composition of Czech forests. – Journal of Forest Science, 50, 31–37.
  36. Vettori, C., Vendramin, G.G., Anzidei, M., Pastorelli, R., Paffetti, D., Giannini, R. 2004. Geographic distribution of chloroplast variation in Italian populations of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 109, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-004-1609-9.
  37. von Wühlisch, G. 2008. EUFORGEN Technical Guidelines for Genetic Conservation and Use for European Beech (Fagus sylvatica). Rome, Bioversity International. 6 pp.
  38. Vornam, B., Decarli, N., Gailing, O. 2004. Spatial distribution of genetic variation in a natural beech stand (Fagus sylvatica L.) based on microsatellite markers. – Conservation Genetics, 5, 561–570. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:COGE.0000041025.82917.ac.
  39. Wang, K.S. 2004. Gene flow in European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). – Genetica, 122, 105–113. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GENE.0000040999.07339.d4.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0015 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 64 - 76
Submitted on: Jun 26, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 23, 2020
Published on: Mar 11, 2021
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Dagmar Zádrapová, Jiří Korecký, Jakub Dvořák, Zuzana Faltinová, Jan Bílý, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.