Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The effect of planting stock and soil scarification on forest regeneration Cover

The effect of planting stock and soil scarification on forest regeneration

By: Andres Jäärats and  Arvo Tullus  
Open Access
|May 2019

References

  1. Grossnickle, S.C., El-Kassaby, Y.A. 2015. Bareroot versus container stocktypes: a performance comparison. – New Forests, 47(1), 1–51.10.1007/s11056-015-9476-6
  2. Helenius, P. 2005. Extension of the planting period of Norway spruce container seedlings: risks related to the drought – growth stage dynamics and handling practices. – Dissertationes Forestales 3. Helsinki, University of Helsinki. 46 pp.10.14214/df.3
  3. Jäärats, A. 2018. The Effect of Planting Stock and Soil Scarification on Forest Regeneration. – Doctoral thesis. Tartu, Estonian University of Life Sciences. 121 pp.10.2478/fsmu-2018-0013
  4. Jäärats, A., Sims, A., Seemen, H. 2010. Growth parameters of coniferous planting stock influenced by principal growing technologies in Estonia. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25(8), 92−100.10.1080/02827581.2010.485780
  5. Jäärats, A., Sims, A., Seemen, H. 2012. The effect of soil scarification on natural regeneration in forest microsites in Estonia. – Baltic Forestry, 18(1), 133−143.
  6. Jäärats, A., Tullus, A., Seemen, H. 2016. Growth and survival of bare-root and container plants of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies during eight years in hemiboreal Estonia. – Baltic Forestry, 22(2), 365−374.
  7. Kerr, G. 1994. A comparison of cell grown and bare-rooted oak and beech seedlings one season after outplanting. – Forestry, 67(4), 297–312.10.1093/forestry/67.4.297
  8. Keskkonnaagentuur. 2016. Forest 2016 (Aastaraamat Mets 2016). Tartu, Keskkonnaagentuur. 293 pp. (In Estonian).
  9. Klavina, D., Gaitnieks, T., Menkis, A. 2013. Survival, growth and ectomycorrhizal community development of container- and bare-root grown Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings outplanted on a forest clear-cut. – Baltic Forestry, 19(1), 39–49.
  10. Lindström, A., Rune, G. 1999. Root deformation in plantations of container-grown Scots pine trees: effects on root growth, tree stability and stem straightness. – Plant and Soil, 217, 29–37.10.1007/978-94-017-3469-1_3
  11. Nilsson, U., Luoranen, J., Kolström, T., Örlander, G., Puttonen, P. 2010. Reforestation with planting in northern Europe. – Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 25(4), 283–294.10.1080/02827581.2010.498384
  12. Paal, H. 1991. Paberpoti taimed Eesti metsades. – Eesti Mets, 5, 27–31. (In Estonian).
  13. R Core Team 2014 R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation or Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [WWW document]. – URL https://www.R-project.org/. [Accessed 20 April 2017].
  14. Seemen, H. 1995. Maapinna ettevalmistamine ketasadraga DONAREN 190. – Eesti Mets, 11, 3–5. (In Estonian).
  15. Seemen, H. 2001. Mis on saanud 1980. aastatel paberpotitaimedega rajatud männikultuuridest? – Eesti Mets, 4–6, 9–11. (In Estonian).
  16. Seemen, H., Pikk, J. 1997. Results of plantation soil preparation by a new assembly. – Baltic Forestry, 3(1), 33–37.
  17. Terasmaa, T. 1991. Istutusmaterjali kvaliteet määrab noorendiku ilme. – Mets ja Puu, 3, 4–7. (In Estonian).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2018-0013 | Journal eISSN: 1736-8723 | Journal ISSN: 1406-9954
Language: English
Page range: 75 - 85
Published on: May 13, 2019
Published by: Estonian University of Life Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Andres Jäärats, Arvo Tullus, published by Estonian University of Life Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.