References
- Aliber, R. Z., Charles, P. K. & Robert, M. S. (2015). Manias, panics, and crashes: A history of financial crises. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Ameriks, J., Veres, R., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2001). Making retirement income last a lifetime. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 82–97.
- Athavale, M., & Goebel, J. M. (2011). A safer safe withdrawal rate using various return distribution. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 36–43.
- Bengen, W. P. (1994). Determining withdrawal rates using historical data. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 171–180.
- Bengen, W. P. (200). Conserving client portfolios during retirement, Part IV. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 110–119.
- Brown, R. (2023). Time to Retire: The 4% Withdrawal Rule. The Journal of Investing, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 91–111.
- Chen, A., Schelling, S., & Sørensen, N. (2023). On the impact of low interest rates on common withdrawal rules in old age. The European Journal of Finance, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 999–1021.
- Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, vol.1, no. 2, pp. 223–236.
- Drew, M., & Walk, A. (2015). Just how safe are ‘safe withdrawal rates’ in retirement? Financial Planning Research Journal, vol.1, no.1, pp. 22–32.
- Finke, M. S., Pfau, W. D., & Blanchett, D. (2013). The 4 percent rule is not safe in a low-yield world. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 46–55.
- Kupczuk, W. (2007). To leave or not to leave: the distribution of bequest motives. Review of Economic Studies, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 207–235.
- Lee, S., & Tan, K. T. (2023). Bequest motives and the social security notch. Review of Economic Dynamics, vol. 5, pp. 888–914.
- Longin, F. (2005). The choice of the distribution of asset returns: How extreme value theory can help? Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 1017–1035.
- MacDonald, B. J., Jones, B., Morrison, R. J., Brown, R. L., & Hardy, M. (2013). Research and reality: A literature review on drawing down retirement financial savings. North American Actuarial Journal, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 181–215.
- Milevsky, M. E. (2001). Spending your retirement in Monte Carlo. Journal of Retirement Planning, vol. 1, no. 4, p. 21.
- Nawrocki, D. (2001). The Problems with Monte Carlo Simulation. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. 92–103.
- Pfau, W. D. (2011). Safe savings rates: a new approach to retirement planning over the lifecycle. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 52–61.
- Pfau, W. D. (2013). A broader framework for determining an efficient frontier for retirement income. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 38–46.
- Pfau, W. D. (2014). The portfolio size effect and the challenges to sustainable withdrawal rates. Journal of Financial Planning, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 38–45.
- Razali, N. M., & Wah, Y. B. (2011). Power comparisons of Shapiro-Wilk, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Lilliefors and Anderson-Darling tests, Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–33.
- Reinhart, C. M., & Kenneth S. R. (2009). This time is different. Princeton University Press.
- Salter, J. R. (2013). The 4% rule (of thumb). Journal of Financial Service Professionals, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 10–12.
- Sapra, S., Klein S., & Martel R. (2023). Asset Allocation for Retirement Income: A Framework for Income-Oriented Investors. Journal of Portfolio Management, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 127–141.
- Stein, M. K. (1998). The prosperous retirement: guide to the new reality. MSTCO Press.
- Taleb, N. (2008). The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. Edición: trade paperback.
- Yan, Y. & James III, R. (2023). Bequest expectations and annuity ownership. Journal of Personal Finance, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 61–71.
- Ying, J. & Russell, T. (2023). The integration of bequest intentions in retirement planning. Journal of Retirement Planning, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 112–130.