Figure 1:
Fit indices for the confirmatory factor analysis
| Model fit for the CFA | Goodness of fit indices | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| χ2 | P | Df | RMSEA | GFI | IFI | TLI | CFI | |
| Sample n=289 | 560.90 | .000 | 180 | .086 | .850 | .906 | .890 | .905 |
Path estimates and critical ratio values
| Relationship | Sample n=289 | Hypothesis Supported/Confirmed | |
|---|---|---|---|
| β | CR | ||
| H1a Self-efficacy → behavioural intention | .510 | 7.361 | Yes |
| H1b Self-efficacy → goals | .549 | 7.643 | Yes |
| H2a Goal clarity → behavioural intention | -.019 | -.284 | No |
| H2b Goal clarity → attitudes | .227 | 3.519 | Yes |
| H3 Attitudes → behavioural intention | .537 | 9.465 | Yes |
| H4a Subjective knowledge → behavioural intention | .029 | .563 | No |
| H4b Subjective knowledge → attitudes | -.183 | -2.833 | No |
| H4c Subjective knowledge → perceived risk | -.164 | -2.458 | Yes |
| H5 Perceived risk → behavioural intentions | .151 | 3.043 | No |