Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Bioeconomy future: Green transition in Europe from the perspective of life-science students Cover

Bioeconomy future: Green transition in Europe from the perspective of life-science students

Open Access
|Jun 2026

References

  1. Alnafrah, I., Alqararah, K., AlJaradin, M., 2025: From linear to circular: Evaluating the effects of circular economy on sustainable development progress in the EU economies. Journal of Environmental Management, 382:125383.
  2. Ball, H. L., 2019: Conducting Online Surveys. Journal of Human Lactation. 35:413–417.
  3. Barra, C., Marcello Falcone, P., 2024: Institutional quality and bioeconomy performance in European countries: Unveiling the evidence. Ecological Economics, 220:108188.
  4. Birner, R., 2018: Bioeconomy Concepts. In: Lewandowski, I. (ed.): Bioeconomy: Shaping the Transition to a Sustainable, Biobased Economy. Cham, Springer International Publishing, p. 17–38.
  5. Briers, S., Ackermann, A., Linser, S., Zivojinovic, I., Martinez de Arano, I., Klapper, J. et al., 2024: Shaping the bioeconomy: Public and private sector perceptions across European regions. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 8:100264.
  6. Briers, S., Ackermann, A., Živojinović, I., Linser, S., Rinn, R., Martinez de Arano, I. et al., 2025: Pathways to bioeconomy development: A multi-regional perspective from Europe. Ambio. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-025-02297-4.
  7. Bugge, M. M., Hansen, T., Klitkou, A., 2016: What Is the Bioeconomy? A Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 8:691.
  8. Carbonell-Alcocer, A., Romero-Luis, J., Gertrudix, M., 2025: The role of communication in environmental awareness according to circular economy stake-holders. Journal of Environmental Management, 374:124112.
  9. Devaney, L., Henchion, M., 2018: Who is a Delphi ‘expert’? Reflections on a bioeconomy expert selection procedure from Ireland. Futures, 99:45–55.
  10. Di Letizia, G., De Lucia, C., Pazienza, P., Cappelletti, G. M., 2023: Forest bioeconomy at regional scale: A systematic literature review and future policy perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics, 155:103052.
  11. Dietz, T., Rubio Jovel, K., Deciancio, M., Boldt, C., Börner, J., 2023: Towards effective national and international governance for a sustainable bioeconomy: A global expert perspective. EFB Bioeconomy Journal, 3:100058.
  12. Dodd, S., Lage-Arias, S., Berglund, K., Jack, S., Hytti, U., Verduijn, K., 2022: Transforming enterprise education: sustainable pedagogies of hope and social justice. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 34:686–700.
  13. Drejerska, N., 2017: Employment in VS. Education for the bioeconomy. Rural development 2017: bio-economy challenges, the 8th international scientific conference, 23–24 November, 2017, Aleksandras Stulginskis University, Lithuania, p. 992–998.
  14. Druckman, J. N., 2004: Political Preference Formation: Competition, Deliberation, and the (Ir)relevance of Framing Effects. American Political Science Review, 98:671–686.
  15. Farstad, M., Otte, P. P., 2021: A full package of gains? Lay perspectives on a bioeconomic transition in Norway. International Journal of Sustainable Society, 13:73–89.
  16. Fuller, T., Warren, L., 2006: Entrepreneurship as foresight: A complex social network perspective on organisational foresight. Futures, 38:956–971.
  17. Gaffey, J., McMahon, H., Marsh, E., Vehmas, K., Kymäläinen, T., Vos, J., 2021: Understanding Consumer Perspectives of Bio-Based Products – A Comparative Case Study from Ireland and The Netherlands. Sustainability, 13:6062.
  18. Giurca, A., Nichiforel, L., Stăncioiu, P. T., Drăgoi, M., Dima, D.-P., 2022: Unlocking Romania’s Forest-Based Bioeconomy Potential: Knowledge-Action-Gaps and the Way Forward. Land, 11:2001.
  19. Golowko, N., Marquardt, K., Budz, S., Foerster-Metz, U., 2019: German students’ perception of bioeconomy: An exploratory study. Amfiteatru Economic, 21:138–151.
  20. Grilli, G., Cantillo, T., Turner, K., Erazo, J., Murcia López, M. A., Valle Parra, J. S. et al., 2024: A decision support procedure for the bioeconomy transition: A Colombian case study. Journal of Environmental Management, 352:120042.
  21. Guo, S., Zhong, S., Zhang, A., 2013: Privacy-preserving Kruskal–Wallis test. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 112:135–145.
  22. Haapasalo, H., Ekholm, T., 2004: A profile of European incubators: a framework for commercialising innovations. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 4:248–270.
  23. Haarich, S., Kirchmayr-Novak, S., 2022: Bioeconomy strategy development in EU regions. JRC Publications Repository. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 111 p.
  24. Halder, P., 2011: Bioenergy knowledge, perceptions, and attitudes among young citizens – from cross-national surveys to conceptual model. Dissertationes Forestales135. 39 p. Available at http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes/df135.htm.
  25. Hansen, E., 2006: The State of Innovation and New Product Development in the North American Lumber and Panel Industry. Wood and Fiber Science, 38:325–333.
  26. Hansen, E., 2016: Responding to the Bioeconomy: Business Model Innovation in the Forest Sector. In: Kutnar, A., Muthu, S. S. (Eds.): Environmental Impacts of Traditional and Innovative Forest-based Bioproducts. Singapore, Springer, p. 227–248.
  27. Hansen, E., Breede, B., 2016: How Innovation Happens: Practical Insights from Cox Industries, Inc. BioProducts Business, 1:32–41.
  28. Hempel, C., Will, S., Zander, K., 2019: Societal Perspectives on a Bio-economy in Germany: An Explorative Study Using Q Methodology. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 10:21–37.
  29. Hinderer, S., Kuckertz, A., 2022: The bioeconomy transformation as an external enabler of sustainable entrepreneurship. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31:2947–2963.
  30. Kleinschmit, D., Arts, B., Giurca, A., Mustalahti, I., Ser-gent, A., Pülzl, H., 2017: Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. International Forestry Review, 19:41–55.
  31. Kuckertz, A., 2020: Bioeconomy Transformation Strategies Worldwide Require Stronger Focus on Entrepreneurship. Sustainability, 12:2911.
  32. Kuckertz, A., Berger, E. S. C., Brändle, L., 2020: Entrepreneurship and the sustainable bioeconomy transformation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 37:332–344.
  33. Lovrić, N., Lovrić, M., Mavsar, R., 2020: Factors behind development of innovations in European forest-based bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 111:102079.
  34. Lovrić, N., Krajter Ostoić, S., Vuletić, D., Stevanov, M., Đorđević, I., Stojanovski, V. et al., 2021: The future of the forest-based bioeconomy in selected southeast European countries. Futures, 128:102725.
  35. Mandel, R., Noyes, E., 2016: Survey of experiential entrepreneurship education offerings among top undergraduate entrepreneurship programs. Education + Training, 58:164–178.
  36. Marcineková, L., Palátová, P., Výbošťok, J., Jarský, V., Riedl, M., Giertliová, B. et al., 2023: Students’ perception of bioeconomy as an important factor in communicating and further development of the bio-economy in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 38:265–274.
  37. Martinez-Fernandez, C., Hinojosa, C., Miranda, G., 2010: Greening Jobs and Skills: Labour Market Implications of Addressing Climate Change. Paris, OECD, 70 p.
  38. Masiero, M., Secco, L., Pettenella, D., Da Re, R., Bernö, H., Carreira, A. et al., 2020: Bioeconomy perception by future stakeholders: Hearing from European forestry students. Ambio, 49:1925–1942.
  39. M’barek, R., Wesseler, J., 2023: The Rapid Development of Bioeconomy Policies in the EU and other Regions of the World. EuroChoices, 22:5–12.
  40. Mosley, F., Van Brusselen, J., 2024: Mapping Finland’s regional forest bioeconomy plans. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 39:20–29.
  41. de Oliveira, M. M., Reisdorfer-Leite, B., Rudek, M., Canciglieri Junior, O., 2020: Evaluation of the Impact of Open Innovation and Acceleration Programs on Research and Development Performed by Universities. Transdisciplinary Engineering for Complex Socio-Technical Systems – Real-Life Applications: Proceedings of the 27th ISTE International Conference on Transdisciplinary Engineering, 1–10 July, 2020. SAGE Publications, p. 2020:92–101.
  42. Papadopoulou, C.-I., Loizou, E., Chatzitheodoridis, F., 2022: Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review. Energies, 15:7258.
  43. Paris, B., Michas, D., Balafoutis, A. T., Nibbi, L., Skvaril, J., Li, H. et al., 2023: A Review of the Current Practices of Bioeconomy Education and Training in the EU. Sustainability, 15:954.
  44. Pettersen, I. B., Aarstad, J., Høvig, Ø. S., Tobiassen, A. E., 2016: Business incubation and the network resources of start-ups. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 5:7.
  45. Rakovic, J., Futter, M. N., Kyllmar, K., Rankinen, K., Stutter, M. I., Vermaat, J. et al., 2020: Nordic Bioeconomy Pathways: Future narratives for assessment of water-related ecosystem services in agricultural and forest management. Ambio, 49:1710–1721.
  46. Reim, W., Sjödin, D., Parida, V., Rova, U., Christakopoulos, P., 2017: Bio-economy based business models for the forest sector – a systematic literature review. International scientific conference Rural development 2017, p. 775–780.
  47. Rinn, R., Jarský, V., 2022: Analysis of Financial Support for Forestry in the Czech Republic from the Perspective of Forest Bioeconomy. Sustainability, 14:15575.
  48. Rodríguez-García, M., Guijarro-García, M., Carrilero-Castillo, A., 2019: An Overview of Ecopreneurship, Eco-Innovation, and the Ecological Sector. Sustainability, 11:2909.
  49. Sadeghzadeh, M., Henchion, M., O’Neill, E., 2025: Exploring social acceptance in the bioeconomy: A scoping review and future research directions. Cleaner and Circular Bioeconomy, 12:100157.
  50. Salvador, R., Barros, M. V., Donner, M., Brito, P., Halog, A., De Francisco, A. C., 2022: How to advance regional circular bioeconomy systems? Identifying barriers, challenges, drivers, and opportunities. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 32:248–269.
  51. Sanchez, L. J., Gerlach, H., Girardi, I., Borzacchiello, M. T., Lusser, M., Avraamides, M., 2020: Strategies and other policy initiatives dedicated to the bioeconomy in the EU and some other countries. European Commission, JRC Publications Repository. Available at https://data.europa.eu/89h/990dcbce-11c8-44f4-a6f4-af7339c9b4ae.
  52. Sassanelli, C., Rosa, R., Rocca, R., Terzi, S., 2019: Circular economy performance assessment methods: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229:440–453.
  53. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M. et al., 2015: Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347:1259855.
  54. Stern, T., Ploll, U., Spies, R., Schwarzbauer, P., Hesser, F., Ranacher, L., 2018: Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria – An Explorative Case Study. Sustainability, 10:4142.
  55. Szarka, N., García Laverde, L., Thrän, D., Kiyko, O., Ilkiv, M., Moravčíková, D. et al., 2023: Stakeholder Engagement in the Co-Design of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies. Sustainability, 15:6967.
  56. Trevisan, A. H., Acerbi, F., Dukovska-Popovska, I., Terzi, S., Sassanelli, C., 2024: Skills for the twin transition in manufacturing: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 474:143603.
  57. Urbaniec, M., Sołtysik, M., Prusak, A., Kułakowski, K., Wojnarowska, M., 2022: Fostering sustainable entrepreneurship by business strategies: An explorative approach in the bioeconomy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31:251–267.
  58. Vainio, A., Ovaska, U., Varho, V., 2019: Not so sustainable? Images of bioeconomy by future environmental professionals and citizens. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210:1396–1405.
  59. Vaz, T. de N., Nijkamp, P., 2009: Knowledge and innovation: The strings between global and local dimensions of sustainable growth. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 21:441–455.
  60. Výbošťok, J., Navrátilová, L., Dobšinská, Z., Dúbravská, B., Giertliová, B., Aláč, P. et al., 2022: Bioeconomy perception by students of different study programs – study from Slovakia. Central European Forestry Journal, 68:91–100.
  61. Wensing, J., Carraresi, L., Bröring, S., 2019: Do pro-environmental values, beliefs and norms drive farmers’ interest in novel practices fostering the Bioeconomy? Journal of Environmental Management, 232:858–867.
  62. Wu, M.-J., Zhao, K., Fils-Aime, F., 2022: Response rates of online surveys in published research: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 7:100206.
  63. AgroParisTech, 2025: FOEBE+ - FOstering Entrepreneurship for a sustainable and innovative BioEconomy. Available at https://www.agroparistech.fr/en/international/european-educational-projects/erasmus-partnerships/foebe-fostering-entrepreneurship-sustainable-and-innovative-bioeconomy (cit. 04-07-2025).
  64. Dietershagen, J., Bammann, H., 2023: Opportunities for youth in the bioeconomy: Opportunities and barriers for youth employment and entrepreneurship in the emerging bioeconomy sectors. Food & Agriculture Organization. Available at https://doi.org/10.4060/cc8238en.
  65. EIGE, 2025: European Institute for Gender Equality. Gender Equality Index. Available at https://eige.europa.eu/gender-equality-index/2024/compare-countriesality Index | European Institute for Gender Equality. (cit. 05-10-2025).
  66. EIT the European Institute of Innovation and Technology, 2021: Strategic Innovation Agenda.
  67. European Commission, 2018: A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe – Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment – Updated bioeconomy strategy. Brussels, 14 p.
  68. European Commission, 2019: A European Green Deal: Striving to Be the First Climate-Neutral Continent. Brussels.
  69. European Commission, 2024: Gender Equality Strategy Monitoring Portal. Brussels. Available at https://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/projects-activities/gender-equality-strategy-monitoring-portal_en (cit. 05-20-2025).
  70. European Commission, 2025a: European Commission. Commission launches public consultation on upcoming EU Bioeconomy Strategy. Available at https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/commission-launches-consultation-eu-bioeconomy-strategy-2025-03-31_en?#:~:text=The%20upcoming%20plan%20aims%20to%20advance%20innovation%20and,upcoming%20EU%20Bioeconomy%20strategy%20on%20Monday%20%2831%20March%29.
  71. European Commission, 2025b: The bioeconomy in different countries. Available at: https://knowledge-4policy.ec.europa.eu/visualisation/bioeconomy-different-countries_en.
  72. EU, 2023: Social entrepreneurship and youth. Available at https://europa.eu/eurobarometer/surveys/detail/2670. (cit. 05-04-2025).
  73. EU, 2025: Communication from the commission to the European parliament, the council, the European economic and social committee and the committee of the regions. A Strategic Framework for a Competitive and Sustainable EU Bioeconomy. Brussels, COM/2025/960 final, 27.11.2025. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52025DC0960. (cit. 1-20-2026).
  74. Eurostat, 2022: Statistical Office of the European Union. Statistical regions in the European Union and partner countries: NUTS and statistical regions 2021: 2022 edition. Luxembourg, Publications Office, 188 p.
  75. Eurostat, 2025: Youth unemployment by sex, age and educational attainment level. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/YTH_EMPL_090/default/table?lang=en. (cit. 05-04-2025).
  76. FAO, 2021. Bioeconomy for a sustainable future. Rome, 8 pp. Available at https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/40f4c204-138d-4786-af70-928090c53bec (cit. 1-20-2026).
  77. Fem4Forest, 2021: Gender reflected mentoring programme for female forest owners and professionals. Project deliverable D.T3.4.1. Interreg DTP project DTP3-500-1.2 Fem4Forest (Forest in Women’s Hands).
  78. Fem2forests, 2025: Good Practice Examples for Career Orientation in Forestry – Booklet. Project Output O1.2.
  79. ICA, 2025: Association for European Life Science Universities (ICA). Shaping Europe’s Bioeconomy Strategy: Contributions from European Life Science Universities, 3 p. Available at https://ica-europe.info/images/stories/pdf/ICA-Response_to_EU_Call_evidence_Bioeconomy_June_2025/ICA_Response_to_EU_Call_for_the_Bioeconomy_Strategy_23-06-2025_final.pdf. (cit. 1-27-2026).
  80. MZe, 2019: Bioeconomy concept in the Czech Republic from the perspective of the Ministry of Agriculture 2019–2024. Available at https://mze.gov.cz/public/portal/-q330519---jxYGZZIL/leaflet-bioeconomy-concept-in-the-czech?_linka=a259463.
  81. OECD and European Commission, 2021: Youth self-employment and entrepreneurship activities. Paris, OECD.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2026-0006 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Language: English
Page range: 101 - 116
Published on: Jun 13, 2026
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Related subjects:

© 2026 Venla Wallius, Radek Rinn, Petra Palátová, Jo Van Brusselen, Siebe Briers, Fredric Mosley, Diana Tuomasjukka, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.