Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Assessing the influence of ground-based LiDAR devices, processing solutions, and forest stand characteristics on tree diameter and height estimation Cover

Assessing the influence of ground-based LiDAR devices, processing solutions, and forest stand characteristics on tree diameter and height estimation

Central European Forestry Journal
Volume 72 (2026): Issue 1 (February 2026)
By: Jozef Výbošťok,  Juliána Chudá,  Michal Skladan,  Daniel Tomčík,  Arunima Singh and  Martin Mokroš  
Open Access
|Feb 2026

References

  1. Astrup, R., Ducey, M. J., Granhus, A., Ritter, T., von Lüpke, N., 2014: Approaches for estimating stand-level volume using terrestrial laser scanning in a single-scan mode. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 44:666–76.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Avery, T. E., Burkhart, H. E., 2015: Forest Measurements: Fifth Edition. Long Grove, Illinois, Waveland Press, 456 p.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Balenović, I., Liang, X., Jurjević, L., Hyyppä, J., Seletković, A., Kukko, A., 2021: Hand-Held Personal Laser Scanning: Current Status and Perspectives for Forest Inventory Application. Croatian journal of forest engineering, 42:165–83.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bauwens, S., Bartholomeus, H., Calders, K., Lejeune, P., 2016: Forest inventory with terrestrial LiDAR: A comparison of static and hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests, 7:127.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Binot, J.-M., Pothier, D., Lebel, J., 1995: Comparison of Relative Accuracy and Time Requirement between the Caliper, the Diameter Tape and an Electronic Tree Measuring Fork. The Forestry Chronicle, 71:197–200.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Cabo, C., Del Pozo, S., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Ordóñez, C., González-Aguilera, D., 2018a: Comparing terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and wearable laser scanning (WLS) for individual tree modeling at plot level. Remote Sensing, 10:540.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Cabo, C., Ordóñez, C., López-Sánchez, C. A., Armesto, J., 2018b: Automatic Dendrometry: Tree Detection, Tree Height and Diameter Estimation Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 69:164–174.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Calders, K., Newnham, G., Burt, A., Murphy, S., Raumonen, P., Herold, M. et al., 2015: Nondestructive Estimates of Above-Ground Biomass Using Terrestrial Laser Scanning. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 6:198–208.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Gollob, C., Ritter, T., Nothdurft, A., 2020: Forest Inventory with Long Range and High-Speed Personal Laser Scanning (PLS) and Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) Technology. Remote Sensing, 12:1509.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Gollob, C., Ritter, T., Kraßnitzer, R., Tockner, A., Nothdurft, A., 2021: Measurement of Forest Inventory Parameters with Apple iPad Pro and Integrated LiDAR Technology. Remote Sensing, 13:3129.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Guenther, M., Heenkenda, M. K., Morris, D., Leblon, B., 2024: Tree Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) Estimation Using an iPad Pro LiDAR Scanner: A Case Study in Boreal Forests, Ontario, Canada. Forests, 15:214.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Hyyppä, E., Kukko, A., Kaijaluoto, R., White, J. C., Wulder, M. A., Pyorala, J. et al., 2020: Accurate Derivation of Stem Curve and Volume Using Backpack Mobile Laser Scanning. ISPRS Journal of Photo-grammetry and Remote Sensing, 161:246–262.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Hyyppä, E., Yu, X., Kaartinen, H., Hakala, T., Kukko, A., Vastaranta, M. et al., 2020: Comparison of backpack, handheld, under-canopy UAV, and above-canopy UAV laser scanning for field reference data collection in boreal forests. Remote Sensing, 12:1–31.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Chen, S., Liu, H., Feng, Z., Shen, C., Chen, P., 2019: Applicability of Personal Laser Scanning in Forestry Inventory. PLoS ONE, 14:e0211392.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Chudá, J., Výbošťok, J., Tomaštík, J., Chudý, F., Tunák, D., Skladan, M. et al., 2024: Prompt Mapping Tree Positions with Handheld Mobile Scanners Based on SLAM Technology. Land, 13:93.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Krause, S., Sanders, T. G. M., Mund, J.-P., Greve, K., 2019: UAV-Based Photogrammetric Tree Height Measurement for Intensive Forest Monitoring. Remote Sensing, 11:758.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Krisanski, S., Taskhiri, M. S., Aracil, S. G., Herries, D., Muneri, A., Gurung, M. B. et al., 2021: Forest structural complexity tool – an open source, fully-automated tool for measuring forest point clouds. Remote Sensing, 13:4677.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Kükenbrink, D., Marty, M., Bösch, R., Ginzler, C., 2022: Benchmarking Laser Scanning and Terrestrial Photogrammetry to Extract Forest Inventory Parameters in a Complex Temperate Forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 113:102999.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Laino, D., Cabo, C., Prendes, C., Janvier, R., Ordonez, C., Nikonovas, T. et al., 2024: 3DFin: a software for automated 3D forest inventories from terrestrial point clouds. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 97:479–496.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Larjavaara, M., Muller-Landau, H. C., 2013: Measuring Tree Height: A Quantitative Comparison of Two Common Field Methods in a Moist Tropical Forest. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 4:793–801.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Li, J., Yang, B., Yang, Y., Zhao, X., Liao, Y., Zhu, N. et al., 2023: Real-Time Automated Forest Field Inventory Using a Compact Low-Cost Helmet-Based Laser Scanning System. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 118:103299.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Li, J., Yuan, S., Cao, M., Nguyen, T.-M., Cao, K., Xie., L., 2024: HCTO: Optimality-Aware LiDAR Inertial Odometry with Hybrid Continuous Time Optimization for Compact Wearable Mapping System. arXiv:2403.14173.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Liang, X., Hyyppä, J., Kukko, A., Kaartinen, H., Jaakkola, A., Yu, X., 2014: The Use of a Mobile Laser Scanning System for Mapping Large Forest Plots. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11:1504–1508.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Liang, X., Kankare, V., Hyyppä, J., Wang, Y., Kukko, A., Haggrén, H. et al., 2016: Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Forest Inventories. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Theme issue “State-of-the-art in photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information science”, 115:63–77.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Liang, X., Hyyppä, J., Kaartinen, H., Lehtomäki, M., Pyörälä, J., Pfeifer, N. et al., 2018: International Benchmarking of Terrestrial Laser Scanning Approaches for Forest Inventories. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 144:137–179.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Liu, G., Wang, J., Dong, P., Chen, Y., Liu, Z., 2018: Estimating Individual Tree Height and Diameter at Breast Height (DBH) from Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) Data at Plot Level. Forests, 9:398.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Luoma, V., Saarinen, N., Wulder, M., White, J., Vastaranta, M., Holopainen, M. et al., 2017: Assessing Precision in Conventional Field Measurements of Individual Tree Attributes. Forests, 8:38.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Martin, A., 2022: Accuracy and Precision in Urban Forestry Tools for Estimating Total Tree Height. Arboriculture & Urban Forestry, 48:319–332.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. McGlade, J., Wallace, L., Hally, B., Reinke, K., Jones, S., 2023: The Effect of Surrounding Vegetation on Basal Stem Measurements Acquired Using Low-Cost Depth Sensors in Urban and Native Forest Environments. Sensors, 23:3933.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Mokroš, M., Mikita, T., Singh, A., Tomaštík, J., Chudá, J., Wężyk, P. et al., 2021: Novel Low-Cost Mobile Mapping Systems for Forest Inventories as Terrestrial Laser Scanning Alternatives. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 104:102512.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Ritter, T., Gollob, C., Nothdurft, A., 2020: Towards an Optimization of Sample Plot Size and Scanner Position Layout for Terrestrial Laser Scanning in Multi-Scan Mode. Forests, 11:1099.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Rouzbeh Kargar, A., MacKenzie, R. A., Apwong, M., Hughes, E., Van Aardt, J., 2020: Stem and Root Assessment in Mangrove Forests Using a Low-Cost, Rapid-Scan Terrestrial Laser Scanner. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 28:883–900.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Ryding, J., Williams, E., Smith, M. J., Eichhorn, M. P., 2015: Assessing handheld mobile laser scanners for forest surveys. Remote Sensing, 7:1095–1111.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Saliu, I. S., Satyanarayana, B., Bin Fisol, M. A., Wolswijk, G., Decannière, C., Lucas, R. et al., 2021: An Accuracy Analysis of Mangrove Tree Height Mensuration Using Forestry Techniques, Hypsometers and UAVs. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 248:106971.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Skladan, M., Chudá, J., Singh, A., Masný, M., Lieskovský, M., Pástor, M. et al., 2025: Choosing the Right Close-Range Technology for Measuring DBH in Fast-Growing Trees Plantations. Trees, Forests and People, 19:100747.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Stal, C., Verbeurgt, J., De Sloover, L., De Wulf, A., 2021: Assessment of Handheld Mobile Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Estimating Tree Parameters. Journal of Forestry Research, 32:1503–1513.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Tatsumi, S., Yamaguchi, K., Furuya, N., 2022: Forest-Scanner: A Mobile Application for Measuring and Mapping Trees with LiDAR-Equipped iPhone and iPad. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. Special Feature: Active Remote Sensing for Ecology and Ecosystem Conservation, 14:1603–1609.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Tupinambá-Simões, F., Pascual, A., Guerra-Hernández, J., Ordóñez, C., de Conto, T., Bravo, F., 2023: Assessing the Performance of a Handheld Laser Scanning System for Individual Tree Mapping – A Mixed Forests Showcase in Spain. Remote Sensing, 15:1169.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Wang, Y., Lehtomäki, M., Liang, X., Pyörälä, J., Kukko, A., Jaakkola, A. et al., 2019: Is Field-Measured Tree Height as Reliable as Believed – A Comparison Study of Tree Height Estimates from Field Measurement, Airborne Laser Scanning and Terrestrial Laser Scanning in a Boreal Forest. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 147:132–145.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Wardius, Y., Hein, S., 2024: Terrestrial Laser Scanning vs. Manual Methods for Assessing Complex Forest Stand Structure: A Comparative Analysis on Plenter Forests. European Journal of Forest Research, 143:635–649.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Wilkes, P., Lau, A., Disney, M., Calders, K., Burt, A., Gonzalez de Tanago, J. et al., 2017: Data Acquisition Considerations for Terrestrial Laser Scanning of Forest Plots. Remote Sensing of Environment, 196:140–153.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. “Files: Anaconda.org”. n.d. Cit 18. august 2023. Available at https://anaconda.org/anaconda/anaconda-navigator/files?version=2.4.0&page=0.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/forj-2025-0018 | Journal eISSN: 2454-0358 | Journal ISSN: 2454-034X
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 3 - 26
Published on: Feb 14, 2026
Published by: National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
terrestrial laser scanning (TLS),
handheld mobile laser scanning (HMLS),
3D Forest Inventory (3DFIN),
Forest Structural Complexity Tool (FSCT),
iPhone-based scanning,
forest inventory methods
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Plant science,
Ecology,
Life sciences, other

© 2026 Jozef Výbošťok, Juliána Chudá, Michal Skladan, Daniel Tomčík, Arunima Singh, Martin Mokroš, published by National Forest Centre and Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 72 (2026): Issue 1 (February 2026)