References
- Almeida, I., Rösch, C., Saha, S., 2018: Comparison of ecosystem services from mixed and monospecific forests in Southwest Germany: A survey on public perception. Forests, 9:627.
- Barca, F., McCann, P., Rodríguez-Pose, A., 2012: The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52:134–152.
- Benford, R. D., Snow, D. A., 2000: Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment – Annual Review of Sociology, 26:611–39.
- Bertsch, V., Hall, M., Weinhardt, C., Fichtner, W., 2016: Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany. Energy, 114:465–477.
- Camagni, R., Capello, R., 2015: Rationale and design of EU Cohesion Policies in a period of crisis. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 7:25–47.
- Capello, R., Perucca, G., 2018: Understanding citizen perception of European Union Cohesion Policy: the role of the local context. Regional Studies, 52:1–13.
- Dobšinská, Z., Sarvašová, Z., 2016: Perceptions of forest owners and the general public on the role of forests in Slovakia. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 12:23–34.
- Đorđević, D., Tadić, J. M., Grgur, B., Ristić, R., Sakan, S., Brezjanović, J. et al., 2024: The influence of exploration activities of a potential lithium mine to the environment in Western Serbia. Scientific reports, 14:17090.
- dos Santos, F. L. M., Duboz, A., Grosso, M., Raposo, M. A., Krause, J., Mourtzouchou, A. et al., 2022: An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union. Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice, 158:224–238.
- Elomina, J., Pülzl, H., 2021: How are forests framed? An analysis of EU forest policy. Forest Policy and Economics, 127:102448.
- Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A., Olsson, O., Westin, K., 2012: Beliefs about urban fringe forests among urban residents in Sweden. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11:321–328.
- Fabra-Crespo, M., Saastamoinen, O., Matero, J., Mäntyranta, H., 2014: Perceptions and realities: public opinion on forests and forestry in Finland, 1993–2012. Silva Fennica, 48:1140.
- Hadzhipetrova-Lachova, M., 2024: The Integration of the Western Balkans into the EU – International conference Knowledge-Based Organization, 30:92–96.
- Halder, P., Paladinić, E., Stevanov, M., Orlović, S., Hokkanen, T. J., Pelkonen, P., 2014: Energy wood production from private forests – nonindustrial private forest owners’ perceptions and attitudes in Croatia and Serbia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 35:515–526.
- Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., 2003: Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Ontario, Oxford University Press, 416 p.
- Howley, P., Ryan, M., Donoghue, C. O., 2011: Forestry in Ireland: An examination of individuals’ preferences and attitudes towards the non-market benefits of forests. Irish Geography, 44:291–302.
- Jankov, D., Stevanov, M., Orlović, S., 2012: Stanje i perspektive energetskog korišćenja šuma u privatnom vlasništvu u Srbiji. Topola/Poplar (189/190), p. 171–183. (In Serbian).
- Jovanovic, D., Acimovic, D., 2014: Environmental issues and the achieved level of media coverage in the Republic of Serbia. Tehnika, 69:332–342.
- Jovanović, M. M., Milanović, M. M., 2017: Remote Sensing and Forest Conservation: Challenges of Illegal Logging in Kursumlija Municipality (Serbia). In: Chakravarty, S., Shukla, G. (eds.): Forest Ecology and Conservation. InTech, p. 99–118.
- Kleinschmit, D., Ferraz Ziegert, R., Walther, L., 2021: Framing Illegal Logging and Its Governance Responses in Brazil – A Structured Review of Diagnosis and Prognosis. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4:624072.
- Kleinschmit, D., Sjöstedt, V., 2014: Between science and politics: Swedish newspaper reporting on forests in a changing climate. Environmental Science & Policy, 35:117–127.
- Krajter Ostoić, S., Konijnendijk van den Bosch, Cecil C., Vuletić, D., Stevanov, M., Živojinović, I. et al., 2017: Citizens’ perception of and satisfaction with urban forests and green space: Results from selected Southeast European cities. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 23:93–103.
- Krejčí, H., Stárová, M., Hrbek, I., Navrátilová, M., Beranová, M., 2019: The perception of forests by the Czech Republic general public. Journal of Forest Science, 65:226–233.
- Krott, M. 2001: Politikfeldanalyse Forstwirtschaft: Eine Einführung für Studium und Praxis. Remagen, Verlag Kessel, 254 p.
- Lazdinis, M., Angelstam, P., Lazdinis, I., 2009: Governing forests of the European Union: institutional framework for interest representation at the European Community level. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19:44–56.
- Lazdinis, M., Angelstam, P., Pülzl, H., 2019: Towards sustainable forest management in the European Union through polycentric forest governance and an integrated landscape approach. Landscape Ecology, 34:1737–1749.
- Lovrić, N., Krajter Ostoić, S., Vuletić, D., Stevanov, M., Đorđević, I., Stojanovski, V. et al., 2021: The future of the forest-based bioeconomy in selected southeast European countries. Futures, 128:102725.
- Lupp, G., Förster, B., Kantelberg, V., Markmann, T., Naumann, J., Honert, C. et al., 2016: Assessing the Recreation Value of Urban Woodland Using the Ecosystem Service Approach in Two Forests in the Munich Metropolitan Region. Sustainability, 8:1156.
- Mack, P., Kremer, J., Kleinschmit, D., 2023: Forest dieback reframed and revisited? Forests (re)negotiated in the German media between forestry and nature conservation. Forest Policy and Economics, 147:102883.
- Mairate, A., 2006: The ‘added value’ of European Union Cohesion Policy. Regional Studies, 40:167–177.
- Malkamäki, A., Korhonen, J. E., Berghäll, S., Berg Rustas, C., Bernö, H., Carreira, A. et al., 2022: Public perceptions of using forests to fuel the European bioeconomy: Findings from eight university cities. Forest Policy and Economics, 140:102749.
- Nichiforel, L., Deuffic, P., Thorsen, B. J., Weiss, G., Hujala, T., Keary, K. et al., 2020: Two decades of forest-related legislation changes in European countries analysed from a property rights perspective. Forest Policy and Economics, 115:102146.
- Nickerson, R. S., 2003: Psychology and environmental change. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. 336 p.
- Niedziałkowski, K., Konczal, A., Mielewczyk, M., 2025: “Hands off our forests!” – The impact of the authoritarian rule on polish forest policy in the context of the European Green Deal. Forest Policy and Economics, 171:103402.
- Nonić, D., Petrović, N., Medarević, M., Glavonjić, P., Nedeljković, J., Stevanov, M. et al., 2015: Forest Land Ownership Change in Serbia: COST Action FP1201 FACESMAP Country Report. European Forest Institute Central-East and South-East European Regional Office, Vienna, 64 p.
- Östberg, J., Kleinschmit, D., 2016: Comparative Study of Local and National Media Reporting: Conflict around the TV Oak in Stockholm, Sweden. Forests, 7:233.
- Paletto, A., Maino, F., de Meo, I., Ferretti, F., 2013: Perception of forest values in the alpine community of Trentino region (Italy). Environmental Management, 51:414–422.
- Paletto, A., Becagli, C., de Meo, I., 2022: Aesthetic preferences for deadwood in forest landscape: A case study in Italy. Journal of Environmental Management, 311:114829.
- Petrović, N. M., 2012: Odnos države i privatnih šumovlasnika prema šumi kao osnov definisanja modela paniranja gazdovanja šumama u Srbiji. PhD thesis, Faculty of Forestry, Belgrade. Available at 10.2298/BG20120712PETROVIC. (In Serbian).
- Pezdevšek Malovrh, Š., Nonić, D., Glavonjić, P., Nedeljković, J., Avdibegović, M., Krč, J., 2015: Private Forest Owner Typologies in Slovenia and Serbia: Targeting Private Forest Owner Groups for Policy Implementation. Small-scale Forestry, 14:423–440.
- Pülzl, H., Wydra, D., Hogl, K., 2018: Piecemeal Integration: Explaining and Understanding 60 Years of European Union Forest Policy-Making. Forests, 9:719.
- PytlikZillig, L. M., Hutchens, M. J., Muhlberger, P., Gonzalez, F. J., Tomkins, A. J., 2018: Policy Acceptance. In: PytlikZillig, L. M., Hutchens, M. J., Muhlberger, P., Gonzalez, F. J., Tomkins, A. J. (eds.): Deliberative Public Engagement with Science. Cham, Springer International Publishing, p. 89–116.
- Radosavljević, M., Masiero, M., Rogelja, T., Glavonjić, B., 2021: Adaptation to EUTR Requirements: Insights from Slovenia, Croatia and Serbia. Forests, 12:1665.
- Radosavljević, M., Rogelja, T., Masiero, M., Čomić, D., Glavonjić, B., Pettenella, D., 2024: Institutional and actor-oriented factors influencing timber legality in selected Western Balkan countries: Multiple case study of Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia, Slovenia and the Republic of Srpska (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Forest Policy and Economics, 166:103261.
- Rametsteiner, E., 2000: Die Österreicher und ihr Wald: Das Bild der Österreicher von Wald, nachhaltiger Waldbewirtschaftung und Zertifizierung im internationalen Vergleich (2nd ed., Schriftenreihe des Instituts für Sozioökonomik der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft / Institut für Sozioökonomik der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft). Wien, Eigenverl. des Inst. für Sozioökonomik der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. (In German).
- Rohe, K., 1994: Politik: Begriffe und Wirklichkeiten. Stuttgart, Berlin, Köln, Kohlhammer, 194 p. (In German).
- Searle, J. R., 1997: The construction of social reality. The Free Press, 256 p.
- Snow, D. A., Benford, R. D., 1988: Ideology, Frame Resonance, And Participant Mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1:197–217.
- Stern, T., Ranacher, L., Mair, C., Berghäll, S., Lähtinen, K., Forsblom, M. et al., 2018: Perceptions on the Importance of Forest Sector Innovations: Biofuels, Biomaterials, or Niche Products? Forests, 9:255.
- Stevanov, M., Krott, M., Curman, M., Krajter Ostoić, S., Stojanovski, V., 2018: The (new) role of public forest administration in Western Balkans: examples from Serbia, Croatia, FYR Macedonia, and Republika Srpska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 48:898–912.
- Šišák, L., 2011: Forest visitors’ opinions on the importance of forest operations, forest functions and sources of their financing. Journal of Forest Science, 57(6), 266–270.
- Trivić, S., 2023: The Belt and Road Initiative and its Impact on Serbia: A Delicate Balance. In: Bogoni, A., Fabrègue, B. F. G. (eds.): The Dragon at the Gates of Europe: Chinese presence in the Balkans and Central-Eastern Europe, Blue Europe, p. 213–246.
- Varela, E., Jacobsen, J. B. Mavsar, R., 2017: Social demand for multiple benefits provided by Aleppo pine forest management in Catalonia, Spain. Regional Environmental Change, 17:539–550.
- Winkel, G., Lovrić, M., Muys, B., Katila, P., Lundhede, T., Pecurul, M. et al., 2022: Governing Europe’s forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options. Forest Policy and Economics, 145:102849.
- Banković, S., Medarević, M., Pantić, D., Petrović, N., 2009: The national forest inventory of the Republic of Serbia: The growing stock of the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Management of the Republic of Serbia, Forest Directorate.
- European Commission, 2019: The European Green Deal: Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels.
- European Commission, 2020: EU Biodiverstiy Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Brussels.
- European Commission, 2021: New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. European Commission, 2025a: Conditions for membership. Available at https://enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/conditions-membership_en. Accessed 5 February 2025.
- European Commission, 2025b: Strategy on research and innovation: Research and innovation for the future we want. Available at https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/strategy/strategy-research-and-innovation_en. Accessed 5 February 2025.
- European Parliament, 2025: The principle of subsidiarity. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/7/the-principle-of-subsidiarity. Accessed 8 February 2025.
- European Union, 1993: Treaty on European Union (with protocols and final act). Concluded at Maastricht on 7 February 1992.
- European Union, 2007: Treaty of Lisbon: Amending The Treaty On European Union And The Treaty Establishing The European Community.
- European Union, 2012: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
- European Union, 2020: Special Eurobarometer 501: Attitudes of European citizens toward the Environment.
- European Union, 2023: Regulation (EU) 2023/ of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on the making available on the Union market and the export from the Union of certain commodities and products associated with deforestation and forest degradation and repealing Regulation (EU) No 995/2010.
- European Union, 2024a: Regulation (EU) 2024/1991 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 June 2024 on nature restoration and amending Regulation (EU) 2022/869: Nature Restoration Law (NRL).
- European Union, 2024b: Special Eurobarometer 550: Attitudes of Europeans towards the environment. European Union, 2025: EU enlargement. Available at https://european-union.europa.eu/principles-countries-history/eu-enlargement_en. Accessed 5 February 2025.
- Fabrègue, B., 2023: Foreign Direct Investments (FDI) in Serbia: a review. Available at https://www.blue-europe.eu/analysis-en/country-analysis/foreign-direct-investments-fdi-in-serbia-a-review/. Accessed 31 January 2025.
- FEA, 2020: The Survey on Corruption and Illegal activities in forestry. Regional Action for Combating Forest Crime And Corruption. The Report of the Activity 3.2, p. 197. Available at https://share.google/RNdvG0nDMBT4IgUl5 (accessed on 01.10.2025).
- Forest Europe, 2020: The state of Europe’s Forests 2020. Bratislava.
- IRI, 2024: Western Balkans Regional Poll: February-March 2024. Available at https://www.iri.org/resources/western-balkans-regional-poll-february-march-2024-full/. Accessed 30 April 2025.
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Water Economy of the Republic of Serbia, 2006: Forestry Development Strategy for the Republic of Serbia. Belgrade, 30 p.
- Pülzl, H., Hogl, K., Kleinschmit, D., Doris, W., Arts, B., 2013: European forest governance: Issues at stake and the way forward (What science can tell us, No 2). Joensuu, European Forest Institute, 102 p.
- Rametsteiner, E., Kraxner, F., 2003: Europeans and Their Forests: What Do Europeans Think About Forests and Sustainable Forest Management? A Review of Representative Public Opinion Surveys in Europe. Vienna, 55 p.
- Rametsteiner, E., Eichler, L., Berg, J., 2009: Shaping forest communication in the European Union: public perceptions of forests and forestry: Tender no. AGRI-2008-EVAL-10, under the Framework Contract No. 30-CE-0101908/00-50. Final Report. Rotterdam.
- Ranacher, L., Sedmik, A., Schwarzbauer, P., 2020: Public perceptions of forestry and the forest-based bioeconomy in the European Union: Knowledge to Action 03: European Forest Institute.
- Stanicek, B., Tarpova, S., 2022: China’s strategic interests in the Western Balkans. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/733558/EPRS_BRI(2022)733558_EN.pdf. Accessed 9 February 2025.
- Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2020: Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade.
- Statistical Office of the Republic of Serbia, 2024: Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade.
- Von der Leyen, U., 2019: A Union that strives for more. My agenda for Europe: Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2019–2024.
- Von der Leyen, U., 2024: Europe’s Choice: Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2024–2029. Strasbourg.
- Winkel, G., Aggestam, F., Sotirov, M., Weiss, G., 2013: Forest Policy in the European Union: What Science can Tell Us 2. European Forest Institute, 102 p.
- Winkel, G., 2017: Towards a sustainable European forest-based bioeconomy – assessment and the way forward: What Science Can Tell Us 8. European Forest Institute, 162 p.