References
- Balest, J., Hrib, M., Dobšinská, Z., ir Paletto, A., 2016: Analysis of the effective stakeholders’ involvement in the development of National Forest Programmes in Europe. International Forestry Review, 18:13–28.
- Biber, P., Borges, J. G., Moshammer, R., Barreiro, S., Botequim, B., Brodrechtová, Y. et al., 2015: How sensitive are ecosystem services in European forest landscapes to silvicultural treatment? Forests, 6:1666–1695.
- Biber, P., Felton, A., Nieuwenhuis, M., Lindbladh, M., Black, K., Bahýľ, J. et al., 2020: Forest Biodiversity, Carbon Sequestration, and Wood Production: Modeling Synergies and Trade-Offs for Ten Forest Landscapes Across Europe. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 8:e547696.
- Brukas, V., 2015: New World, Old Ideas – A Narrative of the Lithuanian Forestry Transition. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17:495–515.
- Buttoud, G., Solberg, B., Tikkanen, I., Pajari, B., 2004: The evaluation of forest policies and programmes. In: EFI Proceedings, No. 52. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, Finland, 271 p.
- Ciancio, O., Nocentini, S., 2011: Biodiversity conservation and systemic silviculture: Concepts and applications. Plant Biosystems – An International Journal Dealing with All Aspects of Plant Biology, 145:411–418.
- Elasser, P., 2002: Rules for participation and negotiation and their possible influence on the content of a National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics, 4:291–300.
- Elsasser, P., 2007: Der Wald, der Brei, seine Köche und ihre Berater – wissenschaftliche Politikberatung für das “Nationale Waldprogramm Deutschland” zwischen Prozessanalyse, aktiver Mitgestaltung und Interessenvertretung. In: Krott, M., Suda, M. (eds.): Macht Wissenschaft Politik? Erfahrungen wissenschaftlicher Beratung im Politikfeld Wald und Umwelt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, p. 80–106. (In German).
- Johansson, J., 2016: Participation and deliberation in Swedish forest governance: The process of initiating a National Forest Program. Forest Policy and Economics, 70:137–146.
- Katila, P., 2017: Forestry development priorities in Finnish national forest programmes. In: The International Forestry Review, Vol. 19, Supplement 1: Special Issue: Shifting global development discourses – Implications for forests and livelihoods. Commonwealth Forestry Association, p. 125–138.
- Kleinschmit, D., Böcher, M., Giessen, L., 2016: Forest policy analysis: Advancing the analytical approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 68:1–6.
- Krott, M., 2005: Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer, 323 p.
- Krott, M., Bader, A., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., Aurenhammer, H., 2014. Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49:34–42.
- Lazdinis, M., Carver, A., Schmithüsen, T., Tõnisson, K., Vilkriste, L., 2005: Forest-Sector Concerns in the Baltic States: Implications for an Expanded European Union. Society & Natural Resources, 18:839–848.
- Lovrić, M., Lovrić, N., Vuletić, D., Martinić, I., 2012: Development of the Concept and Implementation of National Forest Programs with Reference to Croatia. South-east European Forestry, 1849–0891:49–60.
- Makrickiene, E., Brukas, V., Brodrechtova, Y., Mozgeris, G., Sedmák, R., Šálka, J., 2019: From command-and-control to good forest governance: A critical interpretive analysis of Lithuania and Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109:102024.
- Mizaras, S., Mizaraitė, D., 2004: The analysis of Lithuanian Forest Programme in European Context. Baltic Forestry, 10:98–103.
- Mozgeris, G., Brukas, V., Stanislovaitis, A., Kavaliauskas, M., Palicinas, M., 2017: Owner mapping for forest scenario modelling – A Lithuanian case study. Forest Policy and Economics, 85:235–244.
- Mozgeris, G., Kazanavičiūtė, V., Juknelienė, D., 2021: Does Aiming for Long-Term Non-Decreasing Flow of Timber Secure Carbon Accumulation: A Lithuanian Forestry Case. Sustainability, 13:2778.
- Primmer, E., Kyllonen, S., 2006: Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics, 8:838–853.
- Rametsteiner, E., 2002: The role of governments in forest certification – A normative analysis based on new institutional economics theories. Forest Policy and Economics, 4:163–173.
- Schanz, H., 1999: National Forest Programmes – Substantial or Symbolic Co-ordination? In: Glueck, P., Oesten, G., Schanz, H., Volz, K.-R. (eds.): Formulation and Implementation of National Forest Programmes. European Forest Institute Proceedings, 30:237–252.
- Schanz, H., 2002: National forest programmes as dis-cursive institutions. Forest Policy and Economics, 4:269–279.
- Stanislovaitis, A., Brukas, V., Kavaliauskas, M., Mozg-eris, G., 2015: Forest owner is more than her goal: a qualitative typology of Lithuanian owners. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 30:1–14.
- Vančura, K., 2004: National Forestry Programme of the Czech Republic in brief. Journal of Forest Science, 50:563–568.
- Voitleithner, J., 2002: The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria’s law and po-litical culture. Forest Policy and Economics, 4:313–322.
- Weber, N., 2018: Participation or involvement? Development of forest strategies on national and sub-national level in Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 89:98–106.
- Webler, T., Tuler, S., Krueger, R., 2001: What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental management, 27:435–50.
- Winkel, G., Sotirov, P., 2011: An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of “new modes of governance” in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics, 13:143–154.
- FAO, 2003: National Forest Programme: Update 2002. Forestry Department, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Rome.
- FAO and National Forest Programme Facility, 2006: Understanding national forest programmes. Rome.
- FAO, 2006: Global Forest Resource Assessment 2005 – Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper No. 147. Rome, FAO.
- Forest Europe, 2015: Sustainable Forest Management. Available at: https://foresteurope.org/workstreams/sustainable-forest-management/.
- Juerges, N., Arts, B., Masiero, M., Baskent, E. Z., Borges, J. D., Brodrechtova, Y. et al., 2017. ALTER-FOR Deliverable 4.1. Report on actors driving forest management in selected European countries. 122 p. Available at https://ciencia.ucp.pt/en/publications/report-on-actors-driving-fmms-in-selected-european-countries.
- Kupstaitis, N., 2012: Patvirtinta Nacionalinė miškų ūkio sektoriaus plėtros 2012–2020 m. programa. (In Lithuanian).
- Lietuvos Respublikos Aplinkos Ministras. 2002. Įsakymas dėl Lietuvos miškų ūkio politikos ir jos įgyvendinimo strategijos patvirtinimo. Vilnius. (In Lithuanian).
- Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė. 2012. Nutarimas dėl nacionalinės miškų ūkio sektoriaus plėtros 2012–2020 metų programos patvirtinimo. Vilnius. (In Lithuanian).
- Linstad, B. H., 2002: National Forest Policy in Norway – An Overview. In: National Forest Programmes in a European Context. EFI Proceedings No. 44:111–116.
- Makrickiene, E., Mozgeris, G., Pivoriūnas, N., Lynikas, M., Brukas, V., 2017: Actor analysis Lithuania – Case Study Telšiai. In: Deliverable 4.1 – Report on actors driving FMMs in selected European countries (ALTERFOR project report).
- Mayers, J., 2003: National forest programmes and similar beasts: current state of evolution, and future prospects for life. Draft for the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. London, UK, IIED. Available at: www.iied.org/NR/forestry/documents/NFPs_and_similar_beasts.pdf.
- Ministerial Conference for Forest Protection in Europe (MCPFE), 2015: Madrid Ministerial Declaration “25 years together promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Europe”.
- Ministerial Conference for Forest Protection in Europe (MCPFE), 2002: MCPFE approach to national forest programmes in Europe. Liaison unit Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Ministerial Conference for Forest Protection in Europe (MCPFE), 2003: Vienna Declaration and Vienna Resolutions.
- National Agreement on Forests (NAF), 2022: Project (In press).
- Non-legally Binding Instrument on Sustainable Forest Management of all Types of Forests, 2007: GA/Res/62/98. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/forests/pdf/session_documents/unff7/UNFF7_NLBI_draft.pdf.
- Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania, 2020: Nutarimas dėl aštuonioliktosios Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės programos. Vilnius. (In Lithuanian).
- Shannon, M. A., 1999: Moving from the limits and problems of rational planning toward a collaborative and participatory planning approach. EFI Proceedings 30, Vol I.
- State forest service of Lithuania, 2021: Lithuanian forest statistics. Available at: https://amvmt.lrv.lt/lt/atviriduomenys-1/misku-statistikos-leidiniai/misku-ukiostatistika/2021-m-1.
- United Nations, 1992: Non-legally binding authoritative statement of principles for a global consensus on the management, conservation and sustainable development of all types of forests. In: Report of United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992, Annex III. New York. Available at: www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-annex3.htm.
- Welp, M., Hellström, E., 1996: Environmental Forest Conflicts in Germany – from National to International Concern. European Forest Institute, 11, p. 62.
- Žilytė, D., 2018: Seimo narė Virginija Vingrienė – apie miškų reformą ir pokyčių būtinumą. Available at: http://miskininkas.eu/seimo-nare-virginija-vingriene-apie-misku-reforma-ir-pokyciu-butinuma/. (In Lithuanian).