References
- Annighöfer, P., Ameztegui, A., Ammer, Ch., Balandier, P., Bartsch, N., Bolte, A. et al., 2016: Species-specific and generic biomass equations for seedlings and saplings of European tree species. European Journal of Forest Research, 135:313–329.
- Ayanz, J. S. M., de Rigo, D., Caudullo, G., Durrant, T.H., Mauri, A., 2016: European Atlas of Forest Tree Species. European Commission, Official Journal of the European Union, 200 p.
- Bartelink, H. H., 1997: Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Annals of Forest Science, 54:39–50.
- Bošeľa, M., Konôpka, B., Šebeň, V., Vladovič, J., Tobin, B., 2014: Modelling height to diameter ratio – An opportunity to increase Norway spruce stand stability in the Western Carpathians. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 60:71–80.
- Čihák, T., Vejpustková, M., 2022: Biomass allocation and carbon stock in Douglas fir and Norway spruce at the tree and stand level. Central European Forestry Journal, 68:163–173.
- Dutca, I., Mather, R., Blujdea, V. N. B., Ioras, F., Olari, M., 2018: Site-effects on biomass allometric models for early growth plantations of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst). Biomass and Bioenergy, 116:8–17.
- Eckmüllner, O., 2006: Allometric relations to estimate needle and branch mass of Norway spruce and Scots pine in Austria. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 123:7–15.
- Hochbichler, E., Bellos, P., Lick, E., 2006: Biomass functions for estimating needle and branch biomass of spruce (Picea abies) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and branch biomass of beech (Fagus sylvatica) and oak (Quercus robur and petrea). Austrian Journal of Forest Sciences, 123:35–46.
- Kantola, A., Mäkelä, A., 2006: Development of bio-mass proportion in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Trees 20:111–121.
- Konôpka, B., 2016: Wind – an important ecological factor and destructive agent in forests. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 62:123–130.
- Konôpka, B., 2017: A comparative study in young, natural regenerated stands of European beech and Norway spruce. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 134:99–118.
- Konôpka, B., Pajtík, J., Šebeň, V., Merganičová, K., 2021: Young Silver Birch Grows Faster and Allocates Higher Portion of Biomass into Stem Than Norway Spruce, a Case Study from a Post-Disturbance Forest. Forests, 12:433.
- Kunca, A., Zúbrik, M., Galko, J., Vakula, J., Leontovyč, R., Konôpka, B. et al., 2015: Salvage felling in the Slovak forests in the period 2004-2013. Central European Forestry Journal, 61:188–195.
- Kunca, A., Zúbrik, M., Galko, J., Vakula, J., Leontovyč, R., Konôpka, B., 2019: Salvage felling in the Slovak Republic’s forests during the last twenty years (1998–2017). Central European Forestry Journal, 65:3–11.
- Lehtonen, A., 2005: Estimating foliage biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) plots. Tree Physiology, 25:803–811.
- Lieth, H., Whittaker, R.H., 1975: Primary Productivity of the Biosphere. Ecological Studies, Volume 14, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 328 p.
- Lukasová, V., Škvareninová, J., Bičárová, S., Sitárová, Z., Hlavatá, H., Borsányi, P. et al., 2021: Regional and altitudinal aspects in summer heatwave intensification in the Western Carpathians. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 146:1111–1125.
- Moravčík, M., Kovalčík, M., Kunca, A., Schwarz, M., Bednnárová, D., Longauerová, V. et al., 2021: Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v Slovenskej republike za rok 2020. Zelená správa. Ministerstvo pôdohospodárstva a rozvoja vidieka Slovenskej republiky, Bratislava, 135 p.
- Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Lukac, M., 2008: Biomass functions and expansion factors in young Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst). trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 1096–1103.
- Pajtík, J., Konôpka, B., Marušák, R, 2013: Above-ground net primary productivity in young stands of beech and spruce. Lesnícky časopis – Forestry Journal, 59:154–162.
- Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., Mommer, L., 2011: Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193:30–40.
- Repola, J., 2009: Biomass equations for Scots pine and Norway spruce in Finland. Silva Fennica, 43:625–647.
- Satoo, T., Madgwick, H.A.I., 1982: Forest Biomass. Forestry Sciences. Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publisher, The Hague, 152 p.
- Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Bellos, P., Hocbichler, E., Lexer, M.J., 2010: Testing generalized allometries in allocation modeling within an individual-based simulation framework. Trees – Structure and Function, 24:139–150.
- Skovsgaard, J. P., Bald, C., Nord-Larsen, T., 2011: Functions for biomass and basic density of stem, crown and root system of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26:3–20.
- Speer, H. J., 2012: The Fundamentals of Tree-Ring Research. University of Arizona, Terre Haute, 510 p.
- Teobaldelli, M., Somogyi, Z., Migliavacca, M., Usoltsev, V. A., 2009: Generalized functions of biomass expansion factors for conifers and broadleaved by stand age, growing stock and site index. Forest Ecology and Management, 247:1004–1013.
- Vorster, A., Evangelista, P. H., Stovall, A. E. L., Ex, S., 2020: Variability and uncertainty in forest biomass estimates from the tree to landscape scale: the role of allometric equations. Carbon Balance and Management, 15:8.
- Waring, B., Neumann, M., Prentice, I.C., Adams, M., Smith, P., Siegert, M., 2020: Forests and Decarbonization – Roles of Natural and Planted Forests. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 3:58.
- West, P. W., 2009: Tree and Forest Measurement. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 191 p.
- Wirth, Ch., Schumacher, J., Schulze, E.-D., 2004: Generic biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe – a meta-analyses approach towards prediction and uncertainty estimation. Tree Physiology, 24: 121–139.